...
Wiki Markup |
---|
This example from Kernighan and Ritchie \[[Kernighan 88|AA. C References#Kernighan 88]\] shows both the incorrect and correct techniques for deleting items from a linked list. The incorrect solution, clearly marked as wrong in the book, is bad because {{p}} is freed before the {{p->next}} is executed, so {{p->next}} reads memory that has already been freed. |
Code Block |
---|
|
for (p = head; p != NULL; p = p->next)
free(p);
|
...
Kernighan and Ritchie also show the correct solution. To correct this error, a reference to p->next
is stored in q
before freeing p
.
Code Block |
---|
|
for (p = head; p != NULL; p = q) {
q = p->next;
free(p);
}
head = NULL;
|
...
In this noncompliant code example, buff
is written to after it has been freed. These vulnerabilities can be easily exploited to run arbitrary code with the permissions of the vulnerable process and are seldom this obvious. Typically, allocations and frees are far removed, making it difficult to recognize and diagnose these problems.
Code Block |
---|
|
int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) {
char *buff;
buff = (char *)malloc(BUFSIZBUFFERSIZE);
if (!buff) {
/* Handle error condition */
}
/* ... */
free(buff);
/* ... */
strncpy(buff, argv[1], BUFSIZBUFFERSIZE-1);
}
|
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution do not free the memory until it is no longer required.
Code Block |
---|
|
int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) {
char *buff;
buff = (char *)malloc(BUFSIZBUFFERSIZE);
if (!buff) {
/* Handle error condition */
}
/* ... */
strncpy(buff, argv[1], BUFSIZBUFFERSIZE-1);
/* ... */
free(buff);
}
|
...