Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Wiki Markup
This example from Kernighan and Ritchie \[[Kernighan 1988|AA. Bibliography#Kernighan 88]\] shows both the incorrect and correct techniques for deleting items from a linked list. The incorrect solution, clearly marked as wrong in the book, is bad because {{p}} is freed before the {{p->next}} is executed, so {{p->next}} reads memory that has already been freed.

Code Block
bgColor#FFCCCC
langc
for (p = head; p != NULL; p = p->next)
    free(p);

...

Kernighan and Ritchie also show the correct solution. To correct this error, a reference to p->next is stored in q before freeing p.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
langc
for (p = head; p != NULL; p = q) {
  q = p->next;
  free(p);
}
head = NULL;

...

In this noncompliant code example, buff is written to after it has been freed. These vulnerabilities can be easily exploited to run arbitrary code with the permissions of the vulnerable process and are seldom this obvious. Typically, allocations and frees are far removed, making it difficult to recognize and diagnose these problems.

Code Block
bgColor#FFCCCC
langc
int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) {
  char *buff;

  buff = (char *)malloc(BUFFERSIZE);
  if (!buff) {
     /* Handle error condition */
  }
  /* ... */
  free(buff);
  /* ... */
  strncpy(buff, argv[1], BUFFERSIZE-1);
}

...

In this compliant solution do not free the memory until it is no longer required.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
langc
int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) {
  char *buff;

  buff = (char *)malloc(BUFFERSIZE);
  if (!buff) {
     /* Handle error condition */
  }
  /* ... */
  strncpy(buff, argv[1], BUFFERSIZE-1);
  /* ... */
  free(buff);
}

...

Wiki Markup
In this noncompliant example ([CVE-2009-1364|http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2009-1364]) from {{libwmf}} version 0.2.8.4, the return value of {{gdRealloc}} (a simple wrapper around {{realloc}} which reallocates space pointed to by {{im->clip->list}}) is set to {{more}}. However, the value of {{im->clip->list}} is used directly afterwards in the code, and [ISO/IEC 9899:1999|AA. Bibliography#ISO/IEC 9899-1999] specifies that if {{realloc}} moves the area pointed to, then the original is freed. An attacker can then execute arbitrary code by forcing a reallocation (with a sufficient {{im->clip->count}}) and accessing freed memory \[[xorl 2009|http://xorl.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/cve-2009-1364-libwmf-pointer-use-after-free/]\].

Code Block
bgColor#FFCCCC
langc
void gdClipSetAdd(gdImagePtr im,gdClipRectanglePtr rect) {
  gdClipRectanglePtr more;
  if (im->clip == 0) {
    ...
  }
  if (im->clip->count == im->clip->max) {
    more = gdRealloc (im->clip->list,(im->clip->max + 8) *
                      sizeof (gdClipRectangle));
    if (more == 0) return; //if the realloc fails, then we have not lost the im->clip->list value
    im->clip->max += 8;
  }
  im->clip->list[im->clip->count] = (*rect);
  im->clip->count++;

...

The compliant solution simply reassigns im->clip->list to the value of more after the call to realloc.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
langc
void gdClipSetAdd(gdImagePtr im,gdClipRectanglePtr rect) {
  gdClipRectanglePtr more;
  if (im->clip == 0) {
    ...
  }
  if (im->clip->count == im->clip->max) {
    more = gdRealloc (im->clip->list,(im->clip->max + 8) *
                      sizeof (gdClipRectangle));
    if (more == 0) return;
    im->clip->max += 8;
    im->clip->list = more;
  }
  im->clip->list[im->clip->count] = (*rect);
  im->clip->count++;

...