Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Freeing memory multiple times has similar consequences to accessing memory after it is freed. The underlying data structures that manage the heap can become corrupted in a way that could introduce security vulnerabilities into a program. These types of issues are referred to as double-free vulnerabilities. In practice, double-free vulnerabilities can be exploited to execute arbitrary code. VU#623332, which describes a double-free vulnerability in the MIT Kerberos 5 function krb5_recvauth(), is one example.

Wiki MarkupTo eliminate double-free vulnerabilities, it is necessary to guarantee that dynamic memory is freed exactly one time. Programmers should be wary when freeing memory in a loop or conditional statement; if coded incorrectly, these constructs can lead to double-free vulnerabilities. It is also a common error to misuse the {{realloc()}} function in a manner that results in double-free vulnerabilities (see \[[MEM04-A. Do not perform zero length allocations]\]).

Non-Compliant Code Example

...

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
if (number > SIZE_MAX/sizeof(int)) {
   /* handle overflow */
  }
x = (int *)malloc(number * sizeof(int));
if (x == NULL) {
  /* Handle Allocation Error */
}
/* ... */
if (error_condition == 1) {
  /* Handle Error Condition*/
}
/* ... */
free(x);
x = NULL;

...

Note that this solution checks for numeric overflow \[[overflow (see INT32-C. Ensure that operations on signed integers do not result in overflow]\]).

Risk Assessment

Freeing memory multiple times can result in an attacker executing arbitrary code with the permissions of the vulnerable process.

...