Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Vulnerabilities can arise if a non-re-entrant signal handler is interrupted with its own signal, especially if it manipulates globally-accessible data.

This only applies to handlers for signals sent asynchronously (from outside the program). Synchronous signals do not cause race conditions.

Non-Compliant Coding Example

This non-compliant program registers a single signal handler to process both SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2. The variable sig2 should be set to one if one or more SIGUSR1 signals are followed by SIGUSR2. This code essentially implements a finite state machine within the signal handler.

...

This non-compliant code example also violates SIG31-C. Do not access or modify shared objects in signal handlers.

Non-Compliant Coding Example (External finite state machine)

This example moves the finite state machine out of the signal handler, making the handler re-entrant.

...

There is still a race condition in this code where a SIGUSR2 sent immediately after a SIGUSR1 gets ignored. This is because the SIGUSR2 gets processed before the while loop sets the state to 1 and sig2 to 0, which erases the evidence of SIGUSR2. To completely eliminate this race condition, the OS must queue subsequent signals while one signal is being handled, and the finite state machine must be handled by the signal handler.

Compliant Solution (POSIX)

POSIX defines the sigaction(2) function, which assigns handlers to signals like signal(2), but also allows one to explicitly set signal masks. One can thus use sigaction(2) and prevent a signal handler from interrupting itself.

...

In fact, POSIX recommends sigaction(2) and deprecates signal(2). Unfortunately, sigaction(2) is not C99-compliant.

Risk Assessment

Depending on the code, this could lead to any number of attacks, many of which could give root access. For an overview of some software vulnerabilities, see Zalewski's signal article.

Recommendation

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

SIG00-A

3 (high)

3 (likely)

1 (high)

P9

L2

Automated Detection

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

References

Wiki Markup
\[[ISO/IEC 03|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 03]\] Section 5.2.3, "Signals and interrupts"
\[[Open Group 04|AA. C References#Open Group 04]\] [longjmp|http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/longjmp.html]
\[OpenBSD\] [{{signal()}} Man Page|http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=signal]
\[Zalewski\] [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/signals.txt]
\[[Dowd 06 | AA. C References#Dowd 06]\] Chapter 13, "Synchronization and State" (Signal Interruption and Repetition)

...