Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

This noncompliant code example contains a TOCTOU vulnerability. Because cookie is a mutable input, an attacker can cause it to expire between the initial check (the hasExpired() call) and the actual use (the doLogic() call).

Code Block
bgColor#FFcccc

public final class MutableDemo {
  // java.net.HttpCookie is mutable
  public void useMutableInput(HttpCookie cookie) {
    if (cookie == null) {
       throw new NullPointerException();
    }

    // Check whether cookie has expired
    if (cookie.hasExpired()) {
      // Cookie is no longer valid, handle condition by throwing an exception
    }

    // Cookie may have expired since time of check 
    doLogic(cookie);
  }
}

...

This compliant solution avoids the TOCTOU vulnerability by copying the mutable input and performing all operations on the copy. Consequently, an attacker's changes to the mutable input cannot affect the copy. Acceptable techniques include using a copy constructor or implementing the java.lang.Cloneable interface and declaring a public clone method (for classes not declared final). In cases like HttpCookie where the mutable class is declared final — that is, it cannot provide an accessible copy method — perform a manual copy of the object state within the caller. See rule OBJ04-J. Provide mutable classes with copy functionality to safely allow passing instances to untrusted code for more information. Note that any input validation must be performed on the copy rather than on the original object.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

public final class MutableDemo {
  // java.net.HttpCookie is mutable
  public void useMutableInput(HttpCookie cookie) {
    if (cookie == null) {
      throw new NullPointerException();
    }

    // Create copy
    cookie = (HttpCookie)cookie.clone();

    // Check whether cookie has expired
    if (cookie.hasExpired()) {
      // Cookie is no longer valid, handle condition by throwing an exception
    }

    doLogic(cookie);
  }
}

...

This compliant solution demonstrates correct use both of a shallow copy (for the array of int) and of a deep copy (for the array of cookies).

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

public void deepCopy(int[] ints, HttpCookie[] cookies) {
  if (ints == null || cookies == null) {
    throw new NullPointerException();
  }

  // Shallow copy
  int[] intsCopy = ints.clone();

  // Deep copy
  HttpCookie[] cookiesCopy = new HttpCookie[cookies.length];
  for (int i = 0; i < cookies.length; i++) {
    // Manually create copy of each element in array
    cookiesCopy[i] = (HttpCookie)cookies[i].clone();
  }
 
  doLogic(intsCopy, cookiesCopy);
}

...

When the class of a mutable input is nonfinal or is an interface an attacker can write a subclass that maliciously overrides the parent class's clone() method. The attacker's clone() method can subsequently subvert defensive copying. This noncompliant code example demonstrates this weakness.

Code Block
bgColor#FFcccc

// java.util.Collection is an interface
public void copyInterfaceInput(Collection<String> collection) {
  doLogic(collection.clone());
}

...

This compliant solution protects against potential malicious overriding by creating a new instance of the nonfinal mutable input, using the expected class rather than the class of the potentially malicious argument. The newly created instance can be forwarded to any code capable of modifying it.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

public void copyInterfaceInput(Collection<String> collection) {
  // Convert input to trusted implementation
  collection = new ArrayList(collection);
  doLogic(collection);
}

...

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

OBJ06-J

medium

probable

high

P4

L3

Related Vulnerabilities

CVE-2012-0507 describes an exploit that managed to bypass Java's applet security sandbox and run malicious code on a remote user's machine. The exploit created a data structure that is normally impossible to create in Java, but was built using deserialization, and the deserialization process did not perform defensive copies of the deserialized data. See the code examples in SER07-J. Do not use the default serialized form for classes with implementation-defined invariants for more information.

Related Guidelines

...

[Bloch 2008]

Item 39. Make defensive copies when needed

[Pugh 2009]

Returning References to Internal Mutable State

 

OBJ05-J. Defensively copy private mutable class members before returning their references      04. Object Orientation (OBJ)