...
Overriding legacy classes and generifying the overriding method is not a panacea as this is made illegal by the Java Language Specification [JLS 05]. It is best to avoid mixing generic and non-generic code.
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example produces an unchecked warning because the raw type of the List.add()
method is used (the list
parameter in addToList()
method) instead of the parameterized type. To make this code compile cleanly, the @SuppressWarnings
annotation is used.
...
Code Block |
---|
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Integer cannot be cast to java.lang.String at Raw.print(Test.java:11) at Raw.main(Test.java:14) |
Compliant Solution
By gleaning information from the diagnostic exception message, the error can be quickly traced to the line addToList(1)
in the noncompliant code example. Changing this to addToList("1")
is unfortunately a superficial defense. To resolve the real issue, parameterized types must be used consistently and not just abundantly.
...
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
class Parameterized { private static void addToList(List<String> list, String str) { list.add(str); // Unchecked warning } private static void print() { List<String> list = new ArrayList<String> (); addToList(list, "1"); System.out.println(list.get(0)); } public static void main(String[] args) { Parameterized.print(); } } |
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example suffers from related pitfalls. It compiles and runs cleanly. The method printOne()
intends to print the value one, either as an int
or as a double
depending on the type of the variable type
. However, despite list
being correctly parameterized, this method always print '1' and never '1.0' because the int
value '1' is always added to list
without being type checked.
...
This code produces the output:
Code Block |
---|
1.0 1 1 1 |
Compliant Solution
If possible, the addToList()
method should be generified to eliminate possible type violations.
...
If the method addToList()
is externally defined (such as in a library or is an upcall method) and cannot be changed, the same compliant method printOne()
can be used, but no warnings result if addToList(1)
is used instead of addToList(1.0)
. Great care must be taken to ensure type safety when generics are mixed with non-generic code.
Exceptions
EX1: Raw types must be used in class literals. For example, as List<Integer>.class
is illegal, it is permissible to use the raw type List.class
. [Bloch 08]
...
Code Block |
---|
if(o instanceof Set) { // Raw type Set<?> m = (Set<?>) o; // Wildcard type ... } |
Risk Assessment
Mixing generic and non-generic code may produce unexpected results and exceptional conditions.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSC05- J | low | probable | medium | P4 | L3 |
Automated Detection
TODO
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
References
Wiki Markup |
---|
\[[Langer 08|AA. Java References#Langer 08]\] Topic 3, "[Coping with Legacy|http://www.angelikalanger.com/GenericsFAQ/FAQSections/ProgrammingIdioms.html#Topic3]" [[Bloch 08|AA. Java References#Bloch 08]\] Item 23: "Don't use raw types in new code" [[Bloch 07|AA. Java References#Bloch 07]\] Generics, 1. "Avoid Raw Types in New Code" \[[Naftalin 06b|AA. Java References#Naftalin 06b]\] "Principle of Indecent Exposure" [[JLS 05|AA. Java References#JLS 05]\] 4.8 "Raw types" and 5.1.9 "Unchecked Conversion" |
...