Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Changed to JG

...

Many of the Java SE APIs perform security manager checks by default before performing sensitive operations. For example, the constructor of class java.io.FileInputStream throws a SecurityException if the caller does not have the permission to read a file. Because SecurityException is a subclass of RuntimeException, the declarations of some API methods (e.g., those of the java.io.FileReader class) may lack a throws clause that lists the SecurityException. Avoid depending on the presence or absence of security manager checks that are not specified in the API method's documentation.

Noncompliant Code Example (Command-Line Installation)

This noncompliant code example fails to install the security manager from the command line.

Code Block
bgColor#FFcccc

java LocalJavaApp

Compliant Solution (Default Policy File)

Any Java program can attempt to install a SecurityManager programmatically; a default global security manager may forbid this operation. Applications designed to run locally can specify a default global security manager by use of a flag on the command line at invocation.

The command-line option is preferred when applications must be prohibited from installing custom security managers programmatically and are required to abide by the default global security policy under all circumstances. This compliant solution installs the default security manager using the appropriate command-line flags. The security policy file grants permissions to the application for its intended actions.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

java -Djava.security.manager -Djava.security.policy=policyURL LocalJavaApp

The command-line flag can specify a custom security manager whose policies are enforced globally. Use the -Djava.security.manager flag, as follows:

Code Block

java -Djava.security.manager=/path/to/manager ...

...

The default security policy file {{java.policy}}—found in the /path/to/java.home/lib/security directory on UNIX-like systems and its equivalent on Microsoft Windows systems—grants a few permissions (reading system properties, binding to unprivileged ports, and so forth). Also, a user-specific policy file may be located in the user's home directory. The union of these policy files specifies the permissions granted to a program. The java.security file can specify which policy files are used. If either of the systemwide java.policy or java.security files is deleted, no permissions are granted to the executing Java program.

Compliant Solution (Custom Policy File)

Use double equals (==) instead of the single equals = when overriding the global Java security policy file with a custom policy file.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

java -Djava.security.manager -Djava.security.policy==policyURL LocalJavaApp

Compliant Solution (Additional Policy Files)

The appletviewer automatically installs a security manager with the standard policy file. To specify additional policy files, use the -J flag.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

appletviewer -J-Djava.security.manager -Djava.security.policy==policyURL LocalJavaApp

Note that the policy file specified in the argument is ignored when the policy.allowSystemProperty property in the security properties file (java.security) is set to false; the default value of this property is true. The document "Default Policy Implementation and Policy File Syntax" [Policy 2002] discusses in depth the issues of and syntax for writing policy files.

Noncompliant Code Example (Programmatic Installation)

When the SecurityManager API is used instead of the command line to install the security manager, the appropriate checks are omitted in several instances.

This noncompliant code example passes a null value to the setSecurityManager method that is responsible for setting the expected SecurityManager argument. As a result, no security manager is installed programmatically. In the case where the command line failed to install a security manager, this noncompliant code example would execute in the total absence of any security manager.

Code Block
bgColor#FFcccc

try {
  System.setSecurityManager(null);
} catch (SecurityException se) {
  // cannot set security manager, log to file
}

Compliant Solution (Default Security Manager)

This compliant solution instantiates and sets the default security manager.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

try {
  System.setSecurityManager(new SecurityManager());
} catch (SecurityException se) {
  // cannot set security manager, log to file
}

Compliant Solution (Custom Security Manager)

This compliant solution demonstrates how a custom SecurityManager class called CustomSecurityManager can be instantiated by invoking its constructor with a password; this security manager is then installed as the security manager.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

try {
  System.setSecurityManager(new CustomSecurityManager("password here"));
} catch (SecurityException se) {
  // cannot set security manager, log to file
}

After this code executes, APIs that perform security checks use the custom security manager. As noted earlier, custom security managers should be installed only when the default security manager lacks the required functionality.

Risk Assessment

All Java security depends on the existence of a SecurityManager. In the absence of a SecurityManager, arbitrary code can execute, which can include code provided by an attacker.

Guideline

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

ENV02SEC60-J JG

high

probable

low

P18

L1

Automated Detection

Programmatic detection of the presence or absence of a SecurityManager at runtime is straightforward. Static analysis can address the presence or absence of code that would attempt to install a SecurityManager if the code were executed. Checking whether the SecurityManager is installed early enough, specifies the desired properties, or is guaranteed to be installed may be possible in some special cases but is not feasible in full generality.

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this guideline on the CERT website.

Related Guidelines

MITRE CWE: CWE-358 "Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard"

Bibliography

[API 2006] Class SecurityManager, Class AccessControlContext, Class AccessController
[Gong 2003] Section 6.1, Security Manager
[Pistoia 2004] Section 7.4, The Security Manager
[Policy 2002][SecuritySpec 2008] 6.2 SecurityManager versus AccessController

...