It is critical to ensure that threads are activated correctly. Thread activation can be misleading because sometimes the code appears to be performing the function correctly, whereas it may be operating in the presence of subtle concurrency issues.
Noncompliant Code Example
The run()
method of interface Runnable
must be invoked in its own thread, however, this noncompliant code example explicitly invokes it in the context of the current thread.
...
The start()
method is not invoked on the new thread because of the incorrect assumption that run()
activates the thread. Consequently, the statements in the run()
method execute, however, in the same thread instead of the new one.
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution correctly uses the start()
method to start a new thread which then executes the run()
method.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
class Foo implements Runnable { public void run() { // ... } public static void main(String[] args) { Foo f = new foo(); new Thread(f).start(); } } |
Risk Assessment
Failing to activate threads correctly can cause unexpected behavior.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CON05- J | low | probable | medium | P4 | L3 |
Automated Detection
TODO
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
References
Wiki Markup |
---|
\[[API 06|AA. Java References#API 06]\] Interface {{Runnable}} and class {{Thread}} |
...