Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: added CSs

...

A nonfinal class can be subverted simply by declaring a malicious class that inherits from the nonfinal class, which implies that there is no need for reflection. However, reflection is necessary if the nonfinal class is private or otherwise inaccessible to the attacker.

Noncompliant Code Example

In this example, an attacker can easily create an instance and override methods of class BankOperation. This example also assumes the absence of appropriate Security Manager checks.

Code Block
bgColor#FFcccc
class BankOperation {


//The account balance has already been retrieved from the database and stored in the foll variable
  private Integer balance = 5000;

  public BankOperation() {

    //invoke java.lang.Object.getClass to get class instance
    Class clazz = getClass();
    //shows the class of the instantiated object
    System.out.println(clazz);
  }

  public void getBalance() {
    System.out.println("The current balance is: $" + balance);
  }
}

  //This class has been written by the attacker
  public class SubClass extends BankOperation {

    public void getBalance() {

    //The attacker can change his account balance to any value he wants.
    Integer modifiedBalance = 0;
    //to read the new balance from the attacker
    InputStreamReader input = new InputStreamReader(System.in);
    Field balance=null;
    BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(input);
    System.out.print("Enter balance: ");
    try {
          modifiedBalance = Integer.parseInt(reader.readLine());

	  //this gets the private field from the superclass
	  balance = this.getClass().getSuperclass().getDeclaredField("balance");

	  //this changes the accessibility so that field can now be accessed
	  if (!Modifier.isPublic(balance.getModifiers())){
	    balance.setAccessible(true);
	  }
	  //retrieve the original balance
	  System.out.println("Original Balance: $"+balance.get(this));
	  //change the balance
	  balance.set(this, modifiedBalance);
	
	  System.out.println("New Balance: $"+balance.get(this));

    } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } 
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) {
    SubClass subclass = new SubClass();
    subclass.getBalance();
  }
}

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution limits the extensibility of the sensitive class by using the final keyword.

...

In case the class needs to be extended, permissions should be checked in case a subclass is detected during construction so that malicious implementations are blocked.

Compliant Solution

Wiki Markup
Preferring static factory methods over {{public}} or {{protected}} constructors also helps limit class extensibility. \[[Bloch 08|java:AA. Java References#Bloch 08]\]

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

class BankOperation {
  public static void factoryMethod() {
    // ...
  }
}

Compliant Solution

A third solution is to provide a private constructor.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

class BankOperation {
  private BankOperation() {
    // ...
  }
}

Risk Assessment

Allowing a nonfinal class or method to be inherited without checking the class instances allows an attacker to exploit it.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

OBJ33-J

medium

likely

medium

P12

L1

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website

Reference:

Wiki Markup
\[[SCG
07 Secure Coding Guidelines for the Java Programming Language
 07|java:AA. Java References#SCG 07]\] Secure Coding Guidelines      for the Java Programming Language
\[[Bloch 08|java:AA. Java References#Bloch 08]\] Item 1: "Consider static factory methods instead of constructors"

...

OBJ32-J. Do not allow partially initialized objects to be accessed      06. Object Orientation (OBJ)      OBJ34-J. Compare classes and not class names