...
| Wiki Markup |
|---|
<ac:structured-macro ac:name="anchor" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="241909fcf1ca354a-dc1e1cb2-412f4c3f-951e951a-fc8cac7eac317357cfb514c0"><ac:parameter ac:name="">CON20-EX1</ac:parameter></ac:structured-macro> *TSM02-EX1:* It is permissible to start a background thread during class initialization provided the thread does not access any fields. For example, the {{ObjectPreserver}} class (based on \[[Grand 2002|AA. Bibliography#Grand 02]\]) shown below provides a mechanism for storing object references, which prevents an object from being garbage-collected, even if the object is not de-referenced in the future. |
...
Any vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule are listed on the CERT website.
References
Bibliography
<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup |
...
" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="572b46ab-4a2a-4543-a278-0325e023fd80"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[ | [[Bloch |
...
2005b |
...
AA. |
...
Bibliography#Bloch |
...
05b] |
...
] |
...
8. |
...
"Lazy |
...
Initialization" | ]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro> | |||
<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="eee4c245-9631-41d0-93d6-b5aa25346634"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[ | [[Grand 2002 | AA. Bibliography#Grand 02]] | Chapter 5, Creational Patterns, Singleton | ]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro> |
Issue Tracking
| Tasklist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
||Completed||Priority||Locked||CreatedDate||CompletedDate||Assignee||Name|| |T|M|F|1269649993019|1269700561582|rcs_mgr|"Starting and using background threads during class initialization can result in class initialization cycles and deadlock. *For instance,* the main thread responsible for performing class initialization *may* block waiting for the background thread, which in turn will wait for the main thread to finish class initialization." ... see suggested words in bold...I am also generally unsure about the use of "can" vs. "may" because deadlocks are a "possibility" so perhaps "may" should be used?| |
...