Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

For program understandability, do not introduce ambiguity while overloading (see MET50-J. Avoid ambiguous or confusing uses of overloading), and use overloaded methods sparingly [Tutorials 2013].

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example attempts to use the overloaded display() method to perform different actions depending on whether the method is passed an ArrayList<Integer> or a LinkedList<String>:

...

At compile time, the type of the object array is List. The expected output is ArrayList, ArrayList, LinkedList, and List is not recognized (because java.util.Vector is neither an ArrayList nor a LinkedList). The actual output is ArrayList followed by List is not recognized repeated three times. The cause of this unexpected behavior is that overloaded method invocations are affected only by the compile-time type of their arguments: ArrayList for the first invocation and List for the others.

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution uses a single display method and instanceof to distinguish between different types. As expected, the output is ArrayList, ArrayList, LinkedList, List is not recognized:

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
public class Overloader {
  private static String display(List<?> list) {
    return (
      list instanceof ArrayList ? "Arraylist" : 
      (list instanceof LinkedList ? "LinkedList" : 
      "List is not recognized")
    );
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) {
    // Single ArrayList
    System.out.println(display(new ArrayList<Integer>()));

    List<?>[] invokeAll = new List<?>[] {
        new ArrayList<Integer>(), 
        new LinkedList<String>(), 
        new Vector<Integer>()};

    for (List<?> list : invokeAll) {
      System.out.println(display(list));
    }
  }
}

Applicability

Ambiguous uses of overloading can lead to unexpected results.

Bibliography

 

...