Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

It if often assumed that private methods do not require any validation because they are not directly accessible from outside the class. This assumption is misleading as programming errors often arise due to legit code misbehaving in unanticipated ways. For example, a tainted value may propagate from a public API to one of the internal methods via its parameters.

Wiki Markup
Assertions should not be used to validate method parameters. According to \[[JLS 05|AA. Java References#JLS 05]\]:

Along similar lines, assertions should not be used for argument-checking in public methods. Argument-checking is typically part of the contract of a method, and this contract must be upheld whether assertions are enabled or disabled.

Another problem with using assertions for argument checking is that erroneous arguments should result in an appropriate runtime exception (such as IllegalArgumentException, IndexOutOfBoundsException or NullPointerException). An assertion failure will not throw an appropriate exception. Again, it is not illegal to use assertions for argument checking on public methods, but it is generally inappropriate.

Also, note that any defensive copying must be performed before validating the parameters. (See SER34-J. Make defensive copies of private mutable components)

Noncompliant Code Example

...

Noncompliant Code Example

...

This noncompliant code example uses assertions to validate arguments of a public or private method. According to \[[JLS 05|AA. Java References#JLS 05]\]:

...

public

...

method

...

.

Code Block
bgColor#FFcccc
public static int AbsAdd(int x, int y) {
  assert x != Integer.MIN_VALUE;
  assert y != Integer.MIN_VALUE;
  assert ((x <= Integer.MAX_VALUE - y));
  assert ((x >= Integer.MIN_VALUE - y));
  return Math.abs(x) + Math.abs(y);
}

...