Page History

Before the lifetime of the last pointer that stores the return value of a call to a standard memory allocation function has ended, it must be matched by a call to free() with that pointer value.

Noncompliant Code Example

In this noncompliant example, the object allocated by the call to malloc() is not freed before the end of the lifetime of the last pointer text_buffer referring to the object:

#include <stdlib.h>
 
enum { BUFFER_SIZE = 32 };

int f(void) {
  char *text_buffer = (char *)malloc(BUFFER_SIZE); 
  if (text_buffer == NULL

As noted in [undefined behavior 169|CC. Undefined Behavior#ub_169] of Annex J of \[[ISO/IEC 9899-1999|AA. Bibliography#ISO/IEC 9899-1999]\], the behavior a program is [undefined|BB. Definitions#undefined behavior] when

the pointer argument to the free or realloc function does not match a pointer earlier returned by calloc, malloc, or realloc, or the space has been deallocated by a call to free or realloc.

Freeing memory multiple times has similar consequences to accessing memory after it is freed. (See rule MEM30-C. Do not access freed memory.) First, reading a pointer to deallocated memory is undefined because the pointer value is indeterminate and can have a trap representation. In the latter case, doing so can cause a hardware trap. When reading a freed pointer doesn't cause a trap, the underlying data structures that manage the heap can become corrupted in a way that can introduce security vulnerabilities into a program. These types of issues are referred to as double-free vulnerabilities. In practice, double-free vulnerabilities can be exploited to execute arbitrary code. One example of this is VU#623332, which describes a double-free vulnerability in the MIT Kerberos 5 function krb5_recvauth().

To eliminate double-free vulnerabilities, it is necessary to guarantee that dynamic memory is freed exactly one time. Programmers should be wary when freeing memory in a loop or conditional statement; if coded incorrectly, these constructs can lead to double-free vulnerabilities. It is also a common error to misuse the realloc() function in a manner that results in double-free vulnerabilities. (See recommendation MEM04-C. Do not perform zero length allocations.)

Noncompliant Code Example ((malloc())

In this noncompliant code example, the memory referred to by x may be freed twice: once if error_condition is true and again at the end of the code.

int f(size_t n) {
  int error_condition = 0;

  int *x = (int*)malloc(n * sizeof(int));
  if (x == NULL)
    return -1;

  /* Use x and set error_condition on error. */

  if (error_condition == 1) {
    /* Handle error condition*/
    free(x)return -1;
  }

  /* ... */
  free(x);
  return error_condition0;
}

Compliant Solution

...

In this compliant solution, the free a referenced by x is only freed once. This is accomplished by eliminating the call to free() when error_condition is set.pointer is deallocated with a call to free():

Code Block
bgColor #ccccff lang c
#include <stdlib.h> enum { BUFFER_SIZE = 32 }; int f(void) int f(size_t n) { int error_condition = 0; if (n > SIZE_MAX / sizeof(int)) { errno = EOVERFLOW; return -1; } int *xchar *text_buffer = (intchar *)malloc(n * sizeof(int)BUFFER_SIZE); if (xtext_buffer == NULL) { /* Report allocation failure to caller. */ return -1; }   /* Use x and set error_condition on error. */ if (error_condition != 0) { /* Handle error condition and proceed. */ } free(x); free(text_buffer); return error_condition0; }

Note that this solution checks for numeric overflow. (See rule INT32-C. Ensure that operations on signed integers do not result in overflow.)

Noncompliant Code Example (realloc())

Exceptions

MEM31-C-EX1: Allocated memory does not need to be freed if it is assigned to a pointer whose lifetime includes program termination. The following code example illustrates a pointer that stores the return value from malloc() in a static variable:The memory referenced by p may be freed twice in this noncompliant code example.

#include <stdlib.h>
 
enum { BUFFER_SIZE = 32 };

int f(void
/* p is a pointer to dynamically allocated memory */
p2 = realloc(p, size);
if (p2 == NULL) {
  free(p); /* p may be indeterminate when (sizestatic char *text_buffer = NULL;
  if (text_buffer == 0NULL) */
  return;
}

According to the C99 standard \[[ISO/IEC 9899-1999|AA. Bibliography#ISO/IEC 9899-1999]\] (7.20.3):

If the size of the space requested is zero, the behavior is implementation defined: either a null pointer is returned, or the behavior is as if the size were some nonzero value, except that the returned pointer shall not be used to access an object.

and (7.20.3.4):

If memory for the new object cannot be allocated, the old object is not deallocated and its value is unchanged.

If realloc() is called with size equal to 0, then if a null pointer is returned, the old value should be unchanged. However, there are some common but non-conforming implementations that free the pointer including:

1. Glibc (GNU/Linux)
2. AIX
3. HP-UX
4. Solaris
5. OSF/1

This means that calling free on the original pointer might result in a double-free vulnerability. However, not calling free on the original pointer might result in a memory leak.

Compliant Code Example (realloc())

In this compliant solution, allocations of zero-bytes are prevented, ensuring that p is freed exactly once.

/* p is a pointer to dynamically allocated memory */
if (size) {
  p2 = realloc(p, size);
  if (p2{
    text_buffer = (char *)malloc(BUFFER_SIZE); 
    if (text_buffer == NULL) {
    free(p);
  return  return-1;
    }
}
else {
  free(p); }
  return 0;
}

Risk Assessment

Freeing Failing to free memory multiple times can result in an attacker executing arbitrary code with the permissions of the vulnerable processthe exhaustion of system memory resources, which can lead to a denial-of-service attack.

Automated Detection

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Related Guidelines

CERT C++ Secure Coding Standard: MEM31-CPP. Free dynamically allocated memory exactly once

CERT C Secure Coding Standard: MEM04-C. Do not perform zero length allocations

ISO/IEC TR 24772 "XYK Dangling Reference to Heap" and "XYL Memory Leak"

MITRE CWE: CWE-415, "Double Free"

Bibliography

\[[MIT 2005|AA. Bibliography#MIT 05]\]
\[[OWASP, Double Free|AA. Bibliography#OWASP Double Free]\]
\[[Viega 2005|AA. Bibliography#Viega 05]\] "Doubly freeing memory"
\[[VU#623332|AA. Bibliography#VU623332]\]

Key here (explains table format and definitions)

CERT-CWE Mapping Notes

Key here for mapping notes

CWE-404/CWE-459/CWE-771/CWE-772 and FIO42-C/MEM31-C

Intersection( FIO42-C, MEM31-C) = Ø

CWE-404 = CWE-459 = CWE-771 = CWE-772

CWE-404 = Union( FIO42-C, MEM31-C list) where list =

• Failure to free resources besides files or memory chunks, such as mutexes)

Bibliography

...

Image Added Image Added Image AddedImage Removed      08. Memory Management (MEM)      MEM32-C. Detect and handle memory allocation errors