Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Parasoft Jtest 2021.1

Wiki MarkupStarting and using background threads during class initialization can result in class initialization cycles and deadlock. For example, the main thread responsible for performing class initialization can block waiting for the background thread, which , in turn , will wait for the main thread to finish class initialization. This issue can arise, for example, when a database connection is established in a background thread during class initialization \[ [Bloch 2005b|AA. Bibliography#Bloch 05b]\]. Consequently, programs must ensure that class initialization is complete before starting any threads.

Noncompliant Code Example (Background Thread)

In this noncompliant code example, the static initializer starts a background thread as part of class initialization. The background thread attempts to initialize a database connection but should have waited wait until all members of the ConnectionFactory class, including dbConnection, have been are initialized.

Code Block
bgColor#FFcccc

public final class ConnectionFactory {
  private static Connection dbConnection;
  // Other fields ...

  static {
    Thread dbInitializerThread = new Thread(new Runnable() {
        @Override public void run() {
          // Initialize the database connection
          try {
            dbConnection = DriverManager.getConnection("connection string");
          } catch (SQLException e) {
            dbConnection = null;
          }
        }
    });

    // Other initialization, for example, start other threads

    dbInitializerThread.start();
    try {
      dbInitializerThread.join();
    } catch (InterruptedException ie) {
      throw new AssertionError(ie);
    }
  }

  public static Connection getConnection() {
    if (dbConnection == null) {
      throw new IllegalStateException("Error initializing connection");
    }
    return dbConnection;
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) {
    // ...
    Connection connection = getConnection();
  }
}

...

Statically initialized fields are guaranteed to be fully constructed before they are made visible to other threads (see rule [TSM03-J. Do not publish partially initialized objects] for more information). Consequently, the background thread must wait for the main (or foreground) thread to finish initialization before it can proceed. However, the {{ConnectionFactory}} class's main thread invokes the {{join()}} method, which waits for the background thread to finish. This interdependency causes a class initialization cycle that results in a deadlock situation \ [[Bloch 2005b|AA. Bibliography#Bloch 05b]\].

Similarly, it is inappropriate to start threads from constructors (see rule TSM01-J. Do not let the ( this ) reference escape during object construction for more information). Creating timers that perform recurring tasks and starting those timers from within code responsible for initialization also introduces liveness issues.

Compliant Solution (

...

Static Initializer, No Background Threads)

This compliant solution initialized initializes all fields on the main thread , rather than spawning background threads from the static initializer.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

public final class ConnectionFactory {
  private static Connection dbConnection;
  // Other fields ...

  static {
    // Initialize a database connection
    try {
      dbConnection = DriverManager.getConnection("connection string");
    } catch (SQLException e) {
      dbConnection = null;
    }
    // Other initialization (do not start any threads)
  }

  // ...
}

...

This compliant solution initializes the database connection from a ThreadLocal object so that each thread can obtain its own unique instance of the connection.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

public final class ConnectionFactory {
  private static final ThreadLocal<Connection> connectionHolder
                       = new ThreadLocal<Connection>() {
      @Override public Connection initialValue() {
     try {
      try {
Connection dbConnection =
        Connection dbConnection = DriverManager.getConnection("connection string");
          return dbConnection;
        } catch (SQLException e) {
          return null;
        }
      }
    };

  // Other fields ...

  static {
    // Other initialization (do not start any threads)
  }

  public static Connection getConnection() {
    Connection connection = connectionHolder.get();
    if (connection == null) {
      throw new IllegalStateException("Error initializing connection");
    }
    return connection;
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) {
    // ...
    Connection connection = getConnection();
  }
}

The static initializer can be used to initialize any other shared , class fieldsfield. Alternatively, the fields can be initialized from the initialValue() method.

Exceptions

Anchor
unmigrated
CON20-
wiki
EX1
CON20-
markup
EX1
<ac:structured-macro ac:name="anchor" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="5993323a-0ad4-4d40-8789-e111e3542ace"><ac:parameter ac:name="">CON20-EX1</ac:parameter></ac:structured-macro> *TSM02-EX0:* Programs are permitted to start a background thread (or threads) during class initialization, provided the thread cannot access any fields. For example, the {{ObjectPreserver}} class (based on \[[Grand 2002|AA. Bibliography#Grand 02]\]) shown below provides a mechanism for storing object references, which prevents an object from being garbage-collected, even when the object is never again de-referenced
TSM02-J-EX0: Programs are permitted to start a background thread (or threads) during class initialization, provided the thread cannot access any fields. For example, the following ObjectPreserver class (based on [Grand 2002]) provides a mechanism for storing object references, which prevents an object from being garbage-collected even when the object is never again dereferenced.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

public final class ObjectPreserver implements Runnable {
  private static final ObjectPreserver lifeLine = new ObjectPreserver();

  private ObjectPreserver() {
    Thread thread = new Thread(this);
    thread.setDaemon(true);
    thread.start(); // Keep this object alive
  }

  // Neither this class nor HashMap will be garbage-collected.
  // References from HashMap to other objects
  // will also exhibit this property
  private static final ConcurrentHashMap<Integer,Object> protectedMap
      = new ConcurrentHashMap<Integer,Object>();

  public synchronized void run() {
    try {
      wait();
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
      Thread.currentThread().interrupt(); // Reset interrupted status
    }
  }

  // Objects passed to this method will be preserved until
  // the unpreserveObject() method is called
  public static void preserveObject(Object obj) {
    protectedMap.put(0, obj);
  }

  // Returns the same instance every time
  public static Object getObject() {
    return protectedMap.get(0);
  }

  // Unprotect the objects so that they can be garbage-collected
  public static void unpreserveObject() {
    protectedMap.remove(0);
  }
}

This is a singleton class (see rule MSC11MSC07-J. Address the shortcomings of the Singleton design patternPrevent multiple instantiations of singleton objects for more information on how to defensively code singleton classes). The initialization involves creating a background thread using the current instance of the class. The thread waits indefinitely by invoking Object.wait(). Consequently, this object persists for the remainder of the JVMJava Virtual Machine's (JVM) lifetime. Because the object is managed by a daemon thread, the thread cannot interfere with normal shutdown of the JVM.

...

Starting and using background threads during class initialization can result in deadlock conditions.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

TSM02-J

low

Low

probable

Probable

high

High

P2

L3

Bibliography

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="6d998f8c-bbcc-4378-8e90-04e9f2a7908d"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[Bloch 2005b

AA. Bibliography#Bloch 05b]]

8. "Lazy Initialization"

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="455225fb-ee2b-438a-9f36-531f6f0a228a"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

[[Grand 2002

AA. Bibliography#Grand 02]]

Chapter 5, Creational Patterns, Singleton

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

Automated Detection

ToolVersionCheckerDescription
Parasoft Jtest
Include Page
Parasoft_V
Parasoft_V
CERT.TSM02.CSTARTDo not call the "start" method of threads from inside a constructor
SonarQube
Include Page
SonarQube_V
SonarQube_V
S2693Threads should not be started in constructors

Bibliography

[Bloch 2005b]

Chapter 8, "Lazy Initialization"

[Grand 2002]

Chapter 5, "Creational Patterns, Singleton"

Issue Tracking

Tasklist
Review List
Review List

||Completed||Priority||Locked||CreatedDate||CompletedDate||Assignee||Name||
|T|M|F|1269649993019|1269700561582|rcs_mgr|"Starting and using background threads during class initialization can result in class initialization cycles and deadlock. *For instance,* the main thread responsible for performing class initialization *may* block waiting for the background thread, which in turn will wait for the main thread to finish class initialization." ... see suggested words in bold...I am also generally unsure about the use of "can" vs. "may" because deadlocks are a "possibility" so perhaps "may" should be used?|


...

TSM01-J. Do not let the (this) reference escape during object construction      11. Thread-Safety Miscellaneous (TSM)      Image Added Image Added