The C language provides several different kinds of constants: integer constants, such as 10
and 0x1C
; floating constants, such as 1.0
and 6.022e+23
; and character constants, such as 'a'
and '\x10'
. C also provides string literals, such as "hello, world"
and "\n"
. These constants can all be referred to as literals.
...
The C programming language has several mechanisms for creating named, symbolic constants: const
-qualified objects, enumeration constants, and object-like macro definitions. Each of these mechanisms has associated advantages and disadvantages.
const
-Qualified Objects
Objects that are const
-qualified have scope and can be type-checked by the compiler. Because these they are named objects (unlike macro definitions), some debugging tools can show the name of the object. The object also consumes memory.
...
Unfortunately, const
-qualified objects cannot be used where compile-time integer constants are required, namely to define the
- size Size of a bit-field member of a structure.
- size Size of an array (except in the case of variable length arrays).
- value Value of an enumeration constant.
- value Value of a
case
constant.
If any of these are required, then an integer constant (which would be an rvalue) must be used.
const
-qualified objects allow the programmer to take the address of the object.:
Code Block |
---|
const int max = 15; int a[max]; /* invalidInvalid declaration outside of a function */ const int *p; /* aA const-qualified object can have its address taken */ p = &max; |
const
-qualified objects are likely to incur some runtime overhead [Saks 2001b]. Most C compilers, for example, allocate memory for const
-qualified objects. const
-qualified objects declared inside a function body can have automatic storage duration. If so, the compiler will allocate storage for the object, and it will be on the stack. As a result, this storage will need to be allocated and initialized each time the containing function is invoked.
Enumeration Constants
Enumeration constants can be used to represent an integer constant expression that has a value representable as an int
. Unlike const
-qualified objects, enumeration constants do not consume memory. No storage is allocated for the value, so it is not possible to take the address of an enumeration constant.
Code Block |
---|
enum { max = 15 }; int a[max]; /* OK outside function */ const int *p; p = &max; /* errorError: '"&'" on enum constant */ |
Enumeration constants do not allow the type of the value to be specified. An enumeration constant whose value can be represented as an int
is always an int
.
Object-like Macros
A preprocessing directive of the form
#
define
identifier replacement-list
defines an object-like macro that causes each subsequent instance of the macro name to be replaced by the replacement list of preprocessing tokens that constitute the remainder of the directive [ISO/IEC 9899:2011].
C programmers frequently define symbolic constants as object-like macros. For example, the code
...
Object-like macros do not consume memory, and, ; consequently, it is not possible to create a pointer to one. Macros do not provide for type checking because they are textually replaced by the preprocessor.
Macros can be passed as compile-time arguments.
Summary
The following table summarizes some of the differences between const
-qualified objects, enumeration constants, and object-like macro definitions.
Method | Evaluated At | Consumes Memory | Viewable by Debuggers | Type Checking | Compile-Time Constant Expression |
---|
Enumerations |
Compile time |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Runtime |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Macros |
Preprocessor |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Noncompliant Code Example
The meaning of the integer literal 18 is not clear in this example.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
/* ... */ if (age >= 18) { /* Take action */ } else { /* Take a different action */ } /* ... */ |
...
This compliant solution replaces the integer literal 18 with the symbolic constant ADULT_AGE
to clarify the meaning of the code.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
enum { ADULT_AGE=18 }; /* ... */ if (age >= ADULT_AGE) { /* Take action */ } else { /* Take a different action */ } /* ... */ |
...
Integer literals are frequently used when referring to array dimensions, as shown in this noncompliant code example.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
char buffer[256]; /* ... */ fgets(buffer, 256, stdin); |
This use of integer literals can easily result in buffer overflows , if, for example, the buffer size is reduced but the integer literal used in the call to fgets()
is not.
...
In this noncompliant code example, the string literal "localhost"
and integer constant 1234
are embedded directly in program logic and are consequently difficult to change.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
LDAP *ld = ldap_init("localhost", 1234); if (ld == NULL) { perror("ldap_init"); return(1); } |
...
In this compliant solution, the host name and port number are both defined as object-like macros, so they can be passed as compile-time arguments.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#ifndef PORTNUMBER /* mightMight be passed on compile line */ # define PORTNUMBER 1234 #endif #ifndef HOSTNAME /* mightMight be passed on compile line */ # define HOSTNAME "localhost" #endif /* ... */ LDAP *ld = ldap_init(HOSTNAME, PORTNUMBER); if (ld == NULL) { perror("ldap_init"); return(1); } |
Exceptions
DCL06-C-EX1: Although replacing numeric constants with a symbolic constant is often a good practice, it can be taken too far. Remember that the goal is to improve readability. Exceptions can be made for constants that are themselves the abstraction you want to represent, as in this compliant solution.
...
Code Block |
---|
enum { TWO = 2 }; /* aA scalar */ enum { FOUR = 4 }; /* aA scalar */ enum { SQUARE = 2 }; /* anAn exponent */ x = (-b + sqrt(pow(b, SQUARE) - FOUR*a*c))/ (TWO * a); |
...
Using numeric literals makes code more difficult to read and understand. Buffer overruns are frequently a consequence of a magic number being changed in one place (like such as in an array declaration) but not elsewhere (like such as in a loop through an array).
Recommendation | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCL06-C |
Low |
Unlikely |
Medium | P2 | L3 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description |
---|
Axivion Bauhaus Suite |
|
|
|
201 S
Fully implemented
CertC-DCL06 | |
Compass/ROSE |
Could detect violations of this recommendation merely by searching for the use of "magic numbers" and magic strings in the code itself. That is, any number (except a few canonical numbers: −1, 0, 1, 2) that appears in the code anywhere besides where assigned to a variable is a magic number and should instead be assigned to a |
| CC2.DCL06 | Fully implemented | |||||||
Helix QAC |
| C3120, C3121, C3122, C3123, C3131, C3132 | |||||||
LDRA tool suite |
|
201 S | Fully implemented | ||||||||
Parasoft C/C++test |
| CERT_C-DCL06-a | Use meaningful symbolic constants to represent literal values | ||||||
Polyspace Bug Finder |
| Checks for:
Rec. fully covered. |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
...
...
ISO/IEC 9899:2011 Section 6.3.2.1, "Lvalues, arrays, and function designators," section 6.7, "Declarations," section 6.7.2.2, "Enumeration specifiers," and section 6.10.3, "Macro replacement"
ISO/IEC TR 24772 "BRS Leveraging human experience"
...
...
Use of hard-coded, security-relevant constants |
...
Bibliography
[Henricson 1992] | Chapter 10, "Constants" |
[Saks 2001a] | |
[Saks 2001b] | |
[Saks 2002] | |
[Summit 2005] | Question 10.5b |
...