Page History

While it has been common practice to Although programmers often use integers and pointers interchangeably in C, the C99 standard states that pointer-to-integer and integer-to-pointer conversions are implementation-defined. 

Conversions between integers and pointers can have undesired consequences depending on the implementation.

According to the C Standard, subclause 6.3.2.3 [ISO/IEC 9899:2024], Wiki MarkupAccording to C99 \[[ISO/IEC 9899-1999:TC2|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 9899-1999TC2]\], the only value which can be considered interchangeable between pointers and integers is the constant 0. Except in this case, conversions between integers and pointers may have undesired consequences depending on the implementation:

An integer may be converted to any pointer type. Except as previously specified, the result is implementation-defined, might not be correctly aligned, might not point to an entity of the referenced type, and might be a trap representation.

Any pointer type may be converted to an integer type. Except as previously specified, the result is implementation-defined. If the result cannot be represented in the integer type, the behavior is undefined. The result need not be in the range of values of any integer type.

Do not convert an integer type to a pointer type if the resulting pointer is incorrectly aligned, does not point to an entity of the referenced type, or is a trap representation.

Do not convert a pointer type to an integer type if the result cannot be represented in the integer type. (See undefined behavior 24.)

The mapping between pointers and integers must be This is because the mapping functions for converting a pointer to an integer or an integer to a pointer are intended to be consistent with the addressing structure of the execution environment.

...

Issues may arise, for example, on architectures that have a segmented memory model.

Noncompliant Code Example

The size of a pointer can be greater than the size of an integer, such as in an implementation where pointers are 64 bits and unsigned integers are 32 bits. This code example is noncompliant on such implementations because the result of converting the 64-bit ptr cannot be represented in the 32-bit integer type:

void f(void) {
  char *ptr;
  /* ... */
  unsigned int number = (unsigned int)ptr;
  /* ... */
}

Compliant Solution

Any valid pointer to void can be converted to intptr_t or uintptr_t and back with no change in value. (See INT36-EX2.) The C Standard guarantees that a pointer to void may be converted to or from a pointer to any object type and back again and that the result must compare equal to the original pointer. Consequently, converting directly from a char * pointer to a uintptr_t, as in this compliant solution, is allowed on implementations that support the uintptr_t type.

#include <stdint.h>
 
void f(void) {
  char *ptr;
  /* ... */
  uintptr_t number = (uintptr_t)ptr;  
  /* ... */
}

Noncompliant Code Example

In this non-compliant noncompliant code example, the pointer ptr is used in an arithmetic operation that is eventually converted to an integer value. As previously stated, the result of this assignment and following assignment to ptr2 are implementation definedThe high-order 9 bits of the number are used to hold a flag value, and the result is converted back into a pointer. This example is noncompliant on an implementation where pointers are 64 bits and unsigned integers are 32 bits because the result of converting the 64-bit ptr cannot be represented in the 32-bit integer type.

void func(
unsigned int myintflag) = 0;
unsigned int{
  char *ptr;
 = &myint;
/* ... */
  unsigned int number = (unsigned int)ptr + 1;
unsigned int *ptr2 = ptr;

Compliant Solution

;
  number = (number & 0x7fffff) | (flag << 23);
  ptr = (char *)number;
}

A similar scheme was used in early versions of Emacs, limiting its portability and preventing the ability to edit files larger than 8MB.

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution uses a struct to provide storage for both the pointer and the flag value. This solution is portable to machines of different word sizes, both smaller and larger than 32 bits, working even when pointers cannot be represented in any integer type. A union can be used to give raw memory access to both an integer and a pointer. This is an efficient approach as the structure only requires as much storage as the larger of the two fields.

struct ptrflag
union intpoint {
  unsigned intchar *pointer;
  unsigned int flag : number9;
} intpointptrflag;
/* ... */
intpoint mydata = 0xcfcfcfcf;

 
void func(unsigned int flag) {
  char *ptr;
  /* ... */
unsigned int numptrflag.pointer = mydata.number + 1ptr;
unsigned int *ptrptrflag.flag = mydata.pointerflag;
}

...

Noncompliant Code Example

It is sometimes necessary in low level kernel or graphics code to access memory at a specific location, requiring a literal integer to pointer to conversion. In this non-compliant noncompliant code, a pointer is set directly to an integer constant, where it is unknown whether the result will be as intended.:

unsigned int *g(void) {
  unsigned int *ptr = 0xcfcfcfcf0xdeadbeef;
  /* ... */
  return ptr;
} 

The result of this assignment is implementation-defined, might not be correctly aligned, might not point to an entity of the referenced type, and might be a trap representation.

Compliant Solution

...

Unfortunately this code cannot be made safe while strictly conforming to ISO C.

A particular platform (that is, hardware, operating system, compiler, and Standard C library) might guarantee that a memory address is correctly aligned for the pointer type, and actually contains a value for that type. A common practice is to use addresses that are known to point to hardware that provides valid values.

Exceptions

INT36-C-EX1: The integer value 0 can be converted to a pointer; it becomes the null pointer.

INT36-C-EX2: Any valid pointer to void can be converted to intptr_t or uintptr_t or their underlying types and back again with no change in value. Use of underlying types instead of intptr_t or uintptr_t is discouraged, however, because it limits portability.Adding an explicit cast may help the compiler convert the integer value into a valid pointer.

unsigned int *ptr = (unsigned int *)0xcfcfcfcf;

...

#include <assert.h>
#include <stdint.h>
 
void h(void) {
  intptr_t i = (intptr_t)(void *)&i;
  uintptr_t j = (uintptr_t)(void *)&j;
 
  void *ip = (void *)i;
  void *jp = (void *)j;
 
  assert(ip == &i);
  assert(jp == &j);
}

Risk Assessment

Converting from pointer to integer or vice - versa results in unportable code that is not portable and may create unexpected pointers to invalid memory locations.

References

...

Automated Detection

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Related Guidelines

Key here (explains table format and definitions)

CERT-CWE Mapping Notes

Key here for mapping notes

CWE-758 and INT36-C

Independent( INT34-C, INT36-C, MEM30-C, MSC37-C, FLP32-C, EXP33-C, EXP30-C, ERR34-C, ARR32-C)

CWE-758 = Union( INT36-C, list) where list =

• Undefined behavior that results from anything other than integer <-> pointer conversion

CWE-704 and INT36-C

CWE-704 = Union( INT36-C, list) where list =

• Incorrect (?) typecast that is not between integers and pointers

CWE-587 and INT36-C

Intersection( CWE-587, INT36-C) =

• Setting a pointer to an integer value that is ill-defined (trap representation, improperly aligned, mis-typed, etc)

CWE-587 – INT36-C =

• Setting a pointer to a valid integer value (eg points to an object of the correct t ype)

INT36-C – CWE-587 =

• Illegal pointer-to-integer conversion

Intersection(INT36-C,CWE-466) =  ∅  

Intersection(INT36-C,CWE-466) =  ∅

An example explaining the above two equations follows:

static char x[3];

char* foo() {

  int x_int = (int) x; // x_int = 999 eg

  return x_int + 5; // returns 1004 , violates CWE 466

}

...

int y_int = foo(); // violates CWE-466

char* y = (char*) y_int; //  // well-defined but y may be invalid, violates INT36-C

char c = *y; // indeterminate value, out-of-bounds read, violates CWE-119

Bibliography

...

...

...

Image Added Image Added Image Added