A SQL injection vulnerability arises when the original SQL query can be altered to form an altogether different query. Execution of this altered query may result in information leaks or data vulnerabilities arise in applications where elements of a SQL query originate from an untrusted source. Without precautions, the untrusted data may maliciously alter the query, resulting in information leaks or data modification. The primary means of preventing SQL injection are sanitizing and validating untrusted input and parameterizing queries sanitization and validation, which are typically implemented as parameterized queries and stored procedures.
Suppose a database contains user names and passwords used to authenticate users of the system. The user names have a string size limit of 8. The passwords have a size limit of 20.
A SQL command to authenticate a user might take the following form:
system authenticates users by issuing the following query to a SQL database. If the query returns any results, authentication succeeds; otherwise, authentication fails.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
SELECT * FROM db_user WHERE username='<USERNAME>' AND
password='<PASSWORD>'
|
If it returns any records, the user name and password are valid.
Suppose However, if an attacker can substitute arbitrary strings for <USERNAME>
and <PASSWORD>
, they can perform a SQL injection by using the following string for <USERNAME>
. In that case, the authentication mechanism can be bypassed by supplying the following <USERNAME>
with an arbitrary password:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
validuser' OR '1'='1 |
When injected into the command, the command becomes
The authentication routine dynamically constructs the following query:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Code Block | ||
SELECT * FROM db_user WHERE username='validuser' OR '1'='1' AND password='<PASSWORD>' |
If validuser
is a valid user name, this SELECT
statement selects yields the validuser
record in the table. The password is never checked because username='validuser'
is true; consequently, the items after the OR
are not tested. As long as the components after the OR
generate a syntactically correct SQL expression, the attacker is granted the access of validuser
.
LikewiseSimilarly, an attacker could supply a the following string for <PASSWORD>
such as with an arbitrary username:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
' OR '1'='1 |
This would yield producing the following commandquery:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
SELECT * FROM db_user WHERE username='<USERNAME>' AND password='' OR '1'='1'
|
This time, the '1'='1'
tautology disables both user name and password validation, and the attacker is falsely logged in without a correct login ID always evaluates to true, causing the query to yield every row in the database. In this scenario, the attacker would be authenticated without needing a valid username or password.
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example shows JDBC code to authenticate a user to a system. The password is passed as a char
array, the database connection is created, and then the passwords are hashed.
Unfortunately, this code example permits a SQL injection attack because the SQL statement sqlString
accepts unsanitized input arguments. The attack scenario outlined previously would work as describedby incorporating the unsanitized input argument username
into the SQL command, allowing an attacker to inject validuser' OR '1'='1
. The password
argument cannot be used to attack this program because it is passed to the hashPassword()
function, which also sanitizes the input.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
import java.sql.Connection; import java.sql.DriverManager; import java.sql.ResultSet; import java.sql.SQLException; import java.sql.Statement; class Login { public Connection getConnection() throws SQLException { DriverManager.registerDriver(new com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver()); String dbConnection = PropertyManager.getProperty("db.connection"); // Can hold some value like // "jdbc:microsoft:sqlserver://<HOST>:1433,<UID>,<PWD>" return DriverManager.getConnection(dbConnection); } String hashPassword(char[] password) { // Create hash of password } public void doPrivilegedAction(String username, char[] password) throws SQLException { Connection connection = getConnection(); if (connection == null) { // Handle error } try { String pwd = hashPassword(password); String sqlString = "SELECT * FROM db_user WHERE username = '" + username + "' AND password = '" + pwd + "'"; Statement stmt = connection.createStatement(); ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery(sqlString); if (!rs.next()) { throw new SecurityException( "User name or password incorrect" ); } // Authenticated; proceed } finally { try { connection.close(); } catch (SQLException x) { // Forward to handler } } } } |
...
Noncompliant Code Example (PreparedStatement
)
Fortunately, the The JDBC library provides an API for building SQL commands that sanitize untrusted data. The java.sql.PreparedStatement
class properly escapes input strings, preventing SQL injection when used correctly. This is an example of component-based sanitization.This compliant solution code example modifies the doPrivilegedAction()
method to use a PreparedStatement
instead of java.sql.Statement
. However, the prepared statement still permits a SQL injection attack by incorporating the unsanitized input argument username
into the prepared statement.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.DriverManager;
import java.sql.ResultSet;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.sql.Statement;
class Login {
public Connection getConnection() throws SQLException {
DriverManager.registerDriver(new
com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver());
String dbConnection =
PropertyManager.getProperty("db.connection");
// Can hold some value like
// "jdbc:microsoft:sqlserver://<HOST>:1433,<UID>,<PWD>"
return DriverManager.getConnection(dbConnection);
}
String hashPassword(char[] password) {
// Create hash of password
}
public void doPrivilegedAction(
String username, char[] password
) throws SQLException {
Connection connection = getConnection();
if (connection == null) {
// Handle error
}
try {
String pwd = hashPassword(password);
String sqlString = "select * from db_user where username=" +
username + " and password =" + pwd;
PreparedStatement stmt = connection.prepareStatement(sqlString);
ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery();
if (!rs.next()) {
throw new SecurityException("User name or password incorrect");
}
// Authenticated; proceed
} finally {
try {
connection.close();
} catch (SQLException x) {
// Forward to handler
}
}
}
}
|
Compliant Solution (PreparedStatement
)
This compliant solution uses a parametric query with a ?
character as a placeholder for the argument. This code also validates the length of the username
argument, preventing an attacker from submitting an arbitrarily long user name.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
public void doPrivilegedAction( String username, char[] password ) throws SQLException { Connection connection = getConnection(); if (connection == null) { // Handle error } try { String pwd = hashPassword(password); // EnsureValidate that theusername length of user name is legitimate if (username.length() > 8) { // Handle error } String sqlString = "select * from db_user where username=? and password=?"; PreparedStatement stmt = connection.prepareStatement(sqlString); stmt.setString(1, username); stmt.setString(2, pwd); ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery(); if (!rs.next()) { throw new SecurityException("User name or password incorrect"); } // Authenticated; proceed } finally { try { connection.close(); } catch (SQLException x) { // Forward to handler } } } |
Use the set*()
methods of the PreparedStatement
class to enforce strong type checking. This technique mitigates the SQL injection injection vulnerability because the input is properly escaped by automatic entrapment within double quotes. Note that prepared statements must be used even with queries that insert data into the database.
Risk Assessment
Failure to sanitize user input before processing or storing it can result in injection attacks.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDS00-J | High |
Likely | Medium |
P18 | L1 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Checker Framework |
| Tainting Checker | Trust and security errors (see Chapter 8) | ||||||
CodeSonar |
| JAVA.IO.INJ.SQL | SQL Injection (Java) | ||||||
Coverity | 7.5 | SQLI | Implemented | ||||||
Findbugs | 1.0 | SQL_NONCONSTANT_STRING_PASSED_TO_EXECUTE | Implemented | ||||||
Fortify | 1.0 | HTTP_Response_Splitting | Implemented | ||||||
Klocwork |
| SV.DATA. |
DB |
SV.PATH
SV.PATH.INJ
SV.SQL
SQL |
SQL.DBSOURCE | Implemented | ||||||||
Parasoft Jtest |
| CERT.IDS00.TDSQL | Protect against SQL injection | ||||||
SonarQube |
| ||||||||
SpotBugs |
| SQL_NONCONSTANT_STRING_PASSED_TO_EXECUTE |
Implemented |
Related Vulnerabilities
CVE-2008-2370 describes a a vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 through 4.1.37, 5.5.0 through 5.5.26, and 6.0.0 through 6.0.16. When a RequestDispatcher
is used, Tomcat performs path normalization before removing the query string from the URI, which allows remote attackers to conduct directory traversal attacks and read arbitrary files via a ..
(dot dot) in a request parameter.
Related Guidelines
SEI CERT Perl |
Coding Standard | IDS33-PL. Sanitize untrusted data passed across a trust boundary |
Injection [RST] | |
CWE-116, Improper |
Encoding or |
Escaping of |
Output |
Android Implementation Details
This rule uses MS Microsoft SQL Server as an example to show a database connection. However, on Android, DatabaseHelper
from SQLite is used for a database connection. Because Android apps may receive receive untrusted data via network connections, the rule is applicable.
Bibliography
A Guide to Building Secure Web Applications and Web Services | |
[Seacord 2015] | |
[W3C 2008] | Section 4.4.3, "Included If Validating" |
...