Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Callers Client code can trivially access and modify public non-final static fields. Neither accesses nor modifications can be static fields because access to such fields are not checked by a SecurityManager, and newly set values can not be validated. Furthermore multiple threads can modify non-final public static data in ways that are not consistent.

Noncompliant code example

security manager. Furthermore, new values cannot be validated programmatically before they are stored in these fields.

In the presence of multiple threads, nonfinal public static fields can be modified in inconsistent ways (see TSM01-J. Do not let the this reference escape during object construction for an example).

Improper use of public static fields can also result in type-safety issues. For example, untrusted code can supply an unexpected subtype with malicious methods when the variable is defined to be of a more general type, such as java.lang.Object [Gong 2003]. As a result, classes must not contain nonfinal public static fields.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example is taken from JDK v1.4.2 [FT 2008]. It declares a function table containing a public static field. Wiki MarkupThis is an example from the JDK 1.4.2 software.\[[Function Table|#ref3]\]

Code Block
bgColor#FFCCCC

package org.apache.xpath.compiler;

public class FunctionTable {
    public static FuncLoader m_functions;
}

An attacker can replace the function table as follows:

Code Block
bgColor#FFCCCC

FunctionTable.m_functions = <newnew_table>table;

Replacing the function table gives the attacker access to the XPathContext, which is used to evaluate XPath expression. Static set the reference node for evaluating XPath expressions. Manipulating XPathContext can cause XML fields to be modified in inconsistent ways, resulting in unexpected behavior. Also, because static variables are global across a Java runtime environment. They the Java Runtime Environment (JRE), they can be used as a covert communication channel between different application domains (e.g. by for example, through code loaded into by different class loaders).There are a few ways this problem can be avoided

This vulnerability was repaired in JDK v1.4.2_05.

Compliant Solution

Treat public static fields as constants and declare them as final. Consider the use of enum types in the following example.This compliant solution declares the FuncLoader static field final and treats it as a constant:

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

public class MyClass {
    public static final int LEFT  = 1FuncLoader m_functions;
// Initialize m_functions in publica static final int RIGHT = 2;
}

The FuncLoader static instance in the noncompliant example could have been declared as final as below.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

...
public static final FuncLoader m_functions;
...

Compliant Solution

Additionally for mutable static state one can define assessor methods and add appropriate security checks. Note that this is a different example and in this case the scope of the static variable has been changed to private.

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff

public class MyClass {

    private static byte[] data;
    public static byte[] getData() {
        return data.clone();
    }

    public static void setData(byte[] b) {
        securityCheck();
       data = b.clone();
    }
}
initialization block

Fields declared static and final are also safe for multithreaded use (see TSM03-J. Do not publish partially initialized objects for more information). However, remember that simply changing the modifier to final might not prevent attackers from indirectly retrieving an incorrect value from the static final variable before its initialization (see DCL00-J. Prevent class initialization cycles for more information). Furthermore, individual members of the referenced object can also be changed if the object itself is mutable.

It is also permissible to use a wrapper method to retrieve the value of m_functions, allowing m_functions to be declared private (see rule OBJ01-J. Limit accessibility of fields for more information).

Noncompliant Code Example (serialVersionUID)

This noncompliant code example uses a public static nonfinal serialVersionUID field in a class designed for serialization:

Code Block
bgColor#FFCCCC
class DataSerializer implements Serializable {
  public static long serialVersionUID = 1973473122623778747L;
  // ...
}

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution declares the serialVersionUID field final and private:

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
class DataSerializer implements Serializable {
  private static final long serialVersionUID = 1973473122623778747L;
}

The serialization mechanism uses the serialVersionUID field internally, so accessible wrapper methods are unnecessaryHowever as a cautionary note, simply changing the modifier to final may not prevent attackers from indirectly indirectly retrieving an incorrect value from the static final variable before its initialization. See Eliminate Class Initialization Cycles for more on this problem.

Risk Assessment

Unauthorized modifications to of public static variables can result in unexpected behavior and can bypass important security checks and/or invoke malicious codeviolation of class invariants. Furthermore, because static variables can be visible to code loaded by different class loaders when those class loaders are in the same delegation chain, such variables can be used as a covert communication channel between different application domains.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

OBJ31

OBJ10-J

high

Medium

likely

Probable

low

Medium

P9

P8

L2

References

Avoiding Antipatterns Antipattern 5, Misusing Public Static Variables

Java Secure Coding Guidelines Section 3.1, Treat public static fields as constants

Automated Detection

ToolVersionCheckerDescription
CodeSonar4.2FB.MALICIOUS_CODE.MS_SHOULD_BE_FINAL
FB.MALICIOUS_CODE.MS_SHOULD_BE_REFACTORED_TO_BE_FINAL
Field isn't final but should be
Field isn't final but should be refactored to be so
Eclipse1.0
Implemented. The serializable class .* does not declare a static final serialVersionUID field of type long
Coverity7.5FB.MS_SHOULD_BE_FINALImplemented
Findbugs1.0MS_MUTABLE_ARRAY MS_SHOULD_BE_FINAL Implemented
Parasoft Jtest
Include Page
Parasoft_V
Parasoft_V
CERT.OBJ10.SPFF
CERT.OBJ10.RMO
Inspect 'static' fields which may have intended to be declared 'static final'
Avoid referencing mutable fields
SonarQube
Include Page
SonarQube_V
SonarQube_V
S1444"public static" fields should be constant
SpotBugs

Include Page
SpotBugs_V
SpotBugs_V

MS_SHOULD_BE_FINAL Implemented

Related Guidelines

MITRE CWE

CWE-493, Critical Public Variable without Final Modifier
CWE-500, Public Static Field Not Marked Final

Secure Coding Guidelines for Java SE, Version 5.0

Guideline 6-10 / MUTABLE-10: Ensure public static final field values are constants

Bibliography

[FT 2008]

"Function Table"
"Class Function Table"

[Gong 2003]

Section 9.3, "Static Fields"

[Nisewanger 2007]

Antipattern 5, Misusing Public Static Variables

[Sterbenz 2006]

Antipattern 5, Misusing Public Static Variables


...

Image Added Image Added Image Added

Field isn't final but should be refactored to be so Anchorref3ref3Function Table Field detail, public static FuncLoader m_functions