Page History

...

The assert macro expands to a void expression:

#include <assert.h>
void assert(scalar expression);

When it is executed, if expression (which must have a scalar type) is false, the assert macro outputs information about the failed assertion (including the text of the argument, the name of the source file, the source line number, and the name of the enclosing function) on the standard error stream, in an implementation-defined format, and calls the abort() function.

In the following example, the test for integer wrap was omitted for the unsigned multiplication based on the assumption that MAX_TABLE_SIZE * sizeof(char *) cannot exceed SIZE_MAX. While Although we know this is true, it cannot do any harm to codify this assumption.

assert(size <= SIZE_MAX/sizeof(char *));
table_size = size * sizeof(char *);

Assertions are primarily intended for use during debugging , and are generally turned off before code is shipped deployed by defining the NDEBUG macro (typically as a flag passed to the compiler). Consequently, assertions should be used to protect against incorrect programmer assumptions and not for runtime error checking.

Assertions should not never be used to check for to verify the absence of runtime (as opposed to logic) errors, such as

• Invalid user input (including command-line arguments and environment variables)
• File errors (for example, errors opening, reading or writing files)
• Network errors (including network protocol errors)
• Out-of-memory conditions (for example, malloc() or similar failures)
• System resource exhaustion (for example, out-of-file descriptors, processes, threads)
• System call errors (for example, errors executing files, locking or unlocking mutexes)
• Invalid permissions (for example, file, memory, user)
• invalid user input
• file not found
• out of memory
• invalid permissions

Code that protects against a buffer overflow, for example, cannot be implemented as an assertion because this code must be presented in the deployed executable.

In particular, assertions are generally unsuitable for server programs or embedded systems in deployment. A failed assertion can lead to a denial-of-service attack if triggered by a malicious user can discover how to trigger it, such as if size were being derived, in some way derived , from client input. In such situations, a soft failure mode, such as writing to a log file and rejecting the request, is more appropriate.

if (size > SIZE_MAX / sizeof(char *)) {
  fprintf(log_file, "%s: size %zu exceeds %zu bytes\n",
    log_file,  
    __FILE__ ":, size, SIZE_MAX / sizeof(char *));
  size %zu exceeds= SIZE_MAX / sizeof(char *);
}
table_size = size * sizeof(char *)\n", 
    size
  );

Noncompliant Code Example (malloc())

This noncompliant code example uses the assert() macro to verify that memory allocation succeeded. Because memory availability depends on the overall state of the system and can become exhausted at any point during a process lifetime, a robust program must be prepared to gracefully handle and recover from its exhaustion. Consequently, using the assert() macro to verify that a memory allocation succeeded would be inappropriate because doing so might lead to an abrupt termination of the process, opening the possibility of a denial-of-service attack. See also MEM11-C. Do not assume infinite heap space and void MEM32-C. Detect and handle memory allocation errors.

char *dupstring(const char *c_str) {
  size_t len;
  char *dup;

  len = strlen(c_str);
  sizedup = SIZE_MAX/sizeof(char *)malloc(len + 1);
  assert(NULL != dup);

  memcpy(dup, c_str, len + 1);
}
table_size = size * sizeof(char *);
  return dup;
}

Compliant Solution (malloc())

This compliant solution demonstrates how to detect and handle possible memory exhaustion:

char *dupstring(const char *c_str) {
  size_t len;
  char *dup;

  len = strlen(c_str);
  dup = (char*)malloc(len + 1);
  /* Detect and handle memory allocation error */
  if (NULL == dup) {
      return NULL; 
  }

  memcpy(dup, c_str, len + 1);
  return dup;
}

Risk Assessment

Assertions are a valuable diagnostic tool for finding and eliminating software defects that may result in vulnerabilities. The absence of assertions, however, does not mean that code is incorrect.

Automated Detection

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

References

\[[ISO/IEC 9899:1999|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 9899-1999]\] Section 7.2.1, "Program diagnostics"

Related Guidelines

...

Image Added Image Added Image AddedMSC10-A. Character Encoding - UTF8 Related Issues      13. Miscellaneous (MSC)       MSC12-A. Detect and remove code that has no effect