The result of When the requested size is 0, the behavior of the memory allocation functions malloc(
0)
and calloc(0 is undefined. From a practical standpoint, calloc(
0)
, and mallocrealloc(
0) can lead to programming errors with critical security implications, such as buffer overflows. This occurs because the result of calloc(0) and malloc(0) may not considered an error, thus the pointer returned may not be NULL. Instead, the pointer may reference a block of memory on the heap of size zero. If memory is fetched from, or stored in this a location serious error could occur. Numerous, vulnerabilities may allow calloc(0) or malloc(0) to occur, such as VU#179014, VU#226184, and VU#855118.
Non-compliant Code Example 1
In this example, the user defined function calc_size (not shown) is used to calculate the size of the string other_srting. The result of calc_size is returned to str_size and used as the size parameter in a call to calloc. However, if calc_size returned zero, then when the strncpy is executed, a heap buffer overflow will occur.
Code Block |
---|
size_t str_size = calc_size(other_string);
char *str_copy = malloc(str_size);
strncpy(str_copy, other_string, str_size);
|
Compliant Code Example 1
)
is implementation-defined. Subclause 7.22.3 of the C Standard [ISO/IEC 9899:2011] states:
If the size of the space requested is zero, the behavior is implementation-defined: either a null pointer is returned, or the behavior is as if the size were some nonzero value, except that the returned pointer shall not be used to access an object.
In addition, the amount of storage allocated by a successful call to the allocation function when 0 bytes was requested is unspecified. See unspecified behavior 41 in subclause J.1 of the C Standard.
In cases where the memory allocation functions return a non-null pointer, reading from or writing to the allocated memory area results in undefined behavior. Typically, the pointer refers to a zero-length block of memory consisting entirely of control structures. Overwriting these control structures damages the data structures used by the memory manager.
Noncompliant Code Example (malloc()
)
The result of calling malloc(0)
to allocate 0 bytes is implementation-defined. In this example, a dynamic array of integers is allocated to store size
elements. However, if size
is 0, the call to malloc(size)
may return a reference to a block of memory of size 0 instead of a null pointer. When (nonempty) data is copied to this location, a heap-buffer overflow occurs.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
size_t size;
/* Initialize size, possibly by user-controlled input */
int *list = (int *)malloc(size);
if (list == NULL) {
/* Handle allocation error */
}
else {
/* Continue processing list */
}
|
Compliant Solution (malloc()
)
To ensure that 0 To assure that zero (0) is never passed as a size argument to malloc()
, a check must be made on the size parameter. size
is checked to confirm it has a positive value:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
size_t size;
/* Initialize size, possibly by user-controlled input */
if (size == 0) {
/* Handle error */
}
int *list = (int *)malloc(size);
if (list == NULL) {
/* Handle allocation error */
}
/* Continue processing list */
|
Noncompliant Code Example (realloc()
)
The realloc()
function deallocates the old object and returns a pointer to a new object of a specified size. If memory for the new object cannot be allocated, the realloc()
function does not deallocate the old object, and its value is unchanged. If the realloc()
function returns NULL
, failing to free the original memory will result in a memory leak. As a result, the following idiom is often recommended for reallocating memory:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
size_t nsize = /* Some value, possibly user supplied */;
char *p2;
char *p = (char *)malloc(100 | ||||
Code Block | ||||
size_t str_size = calc_size(other_string); if (str_sizep !== 0NULL) { /* Handle error */ } /* ... */ if ((p2 = char *str_copy = malloc(str_size); strncpy(str_copy, other_string, str_size); } (char *)realloc(p, nsize)) == NULL) { free(p); p = NULL; return NULL; } p = p2; |
However, this commonly recommended idiom has problems with zero-length allocations. If the value of nsize
in this example is 0, the standard allows the option of either returning a null pointer or returning a pointer to an invalid (for example, zero-length) object. In cases where the realloc()
function frees the memory but returns a null pointer, execution of the code results in a double-free vulnerability. If the realloc()
function returns a non-null value, but the size was 0, the returned memory will be of size 0, and a heap overflow will occur if nonempty data is copied there.
Implementation Details
If this noncompliant code is compiled with GCC 3.4.6 and linked with libc 2.3.4, invoking realloc(p, 0)
returns a non-null pointer to a zero-sized object (the same as malloc(0)
). However, if the same code is compiled with either Microsoft Visual Studio or GCC 4.1.0 , realloc(p, 0)
returns a null pointer, resulting in a double-free vulnerability.
Compliant Solution (realloc()
)
This compliant solution does not pass a size argument of zero to the realloc()
function:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
size_t nsize;
/* Initialize nsize */
char *p2;
char *p = (char *)malloc(100);
if (p == NULL) {
/* Handle error */
}
/* ... */
p2 = NULL;
if (nsize != 0) {
p2 = (char *)realloc(p, nsize);
}
if (p2 == NULL) {
free(p);
p = NULL;
return NULL;
}
p = p2;
|
Risk Assessment
Allocating 0 bytes can lead to abnormal program termination.
Recommendation | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEM04-C | Low | Likely | Medium | P6 | L2 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Astrée |
| Supported, but no explicit checker | |||||||
CodeSonar |
| (customization) | Users can add a custom check for allocator calls with size argument 0 (this includes literal 0, underconstrained tainted values, and computed values). | ||||||
Compass/ROSE | Can detect some violations of this rule. In particular, it warns when the argument to | ||||||||
Parasoft C/C++test |
| CERT_C-MEM04-a | The validity of values passed to library functions shall be checked | ||||||
Polyspace Bug Finder |
| Checks for:
Rec. fully covered. |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
SEI CERT C++ Coding Standard | VOID MEM04-CPP. Do not perform zero-length allocations |
MITRE CWE | CWE-687, Function call with incorrectly specified argument value |
Bibliography
[ISO/IEC 9899:2011] | Section 7.22.3, "Memory Management Functions" |
[Seacord 2013] | Chapter 4, "Dynamic Memory Management" |
[Vanegue 2010] | "Automated Vulnerability Analysis of Zero-Sized Heap Allocations" |
...