Avoid excessive stack allocations, particularly in situations where the growth of the stack can be controlled or influenced by an attacker. See INT04-C. Enforce limits on integer values originating from tainted sources for more information on preventing attacker-controlled integers from exhausting memory.
Noncompliant Code Example
The C Standard includes support for variable length arrays (VLAs). If the array length is derived from an untrusted data source, an attacker can cause the process to perform an excessive allocation on the stack.
This noncompliant code example temporarily stores data read from a source file into a buffer. The buffer is allocated on the stack as a VLA of size bufsize
. If bufsize
can be controlled by a malicious user, this code can be exploited to cause a denial-of-service attack:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
The stack is frequently used for convenient temporary storage, because allocated memory is automatically freed when the function returns. Generally, the operating system will grow the stack as needed. However, this can fail due to a lack of memory or collision with other allocated areas of the address space (depending on the architecture). When this occurs, the operating system may terminate the program abnormally. If user input is able to influence the amount of stack memory allocated, then an attacker could use this in a denial-of-service attack.
Non-Compliant Code Example
C99 includes support for variable length arrays. If the value used for the length of the array is influenced by user input, an attacker could cause the program to use a large number of stack pages, possibly resulting in the process being killed due to lack of memory, or simply cause the stack pointer to point to a different region of memory. The latter could be used to write to an arbitrary memory location.
The following non-compliant code copies a file. It allocates a buffer of user-defined size on the stack to temporarily store data read from the source file.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
int copy_file(FILE *src, FILE *dst, size_t bufsize) { char buf[bufsize]; while (fgets(buf, bufsize, src)) { if (fputs(buf, dst);) == EOF) { /* Handle error */ } } return 0; } |
If the size of the buffer is not constrained, a malicious user could specify a buffer of several gigabytes which might cause a crash. If the architecture is set up in a way that the heap exists "below" the stack in memory, a buffer exactly long enough to place the stack pointer into the heap could be used to overwrite memory there with what fputs()
and fgets()
store on the stackThe BSD extension function alloca()
behaves in a similar fashion to VLAs; its use is not recommended [Loosemore 2007].
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution replaces the dynamic array the VLA with a call to malloc()
. A If malloc()
failure should not cause a program to terminate abnormally, and fails, the return value of malloc()
can be checked for success to see if it is safe to continueto prevent the program from terminating abnormally.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
int copy_file(FILE *src, FILE *dst, size_t bufsize) { if (bufsize == 0) { /* Handle error */ } char *buf = (char *)malloc(bufsize); if (!buf) { /* Handle return -1;error */ } while (fgets(buf, bufsize, src)) { if (fputs(buf, dst);) == EOF) { /* Handle error */ } } /* ... */ free(buf); return 0; } |
...
Noncompliant Code Example
Using recursion Recursion can also lead to large stack allocations. It needs to be ensured that functions which are recursive do not recurse so deep that the stack grows too large.Recursive functions must ensure that they do not exhaust the stack as a result of excessive recursions.
This noncompliant The following implementation of the Fibonacci function uses recursion.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
unsigned long fib1(unsigned int n) {
if (n == 0) {
return 0;
}
else if (n == 1 || n == 2) {
return 1;
}
else {
return fib1(n-1) + fib1(n-2);
}
}
|
The stack space needed grows exponentially The amount of stack space needed grows linearly with respect to the parameter n
. When tested on a Linux system, fib1(100)
crashes with a segmentation faultLarge values of n
have been shown to cause abnormal program termination.
Compliant Solution
This implementation of the Fibonacci functions eliminates the use of recursion.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
unsigned long fib2(unsigned int n) { if (n == 0) { return 0; } else if (n == 1 || n == 2) { return 1; } unsigned long prev = 1; unsigned long cur = 1; unsigned int i; for (i = 3; i <= n; i++) { unsigned long tmp = cur; cur = cur + prev; prev = tmp; } return cur; } |
Because there is no recursion, the amount of stack space needed does not depend on the parameter n
, greatly reducing the risk of stack overflow.
Risk Assessment
Stack overflow caused by excessive stack allocations or recursion could lead to abnormal termination and denial-of-service attacks.
Program stacks are frequently used for convenient temporary storage because allocated memory is automatically freed when the function returns. Generally, the operating system grows the stack as needed. However, growing the stack can fail because of a lack of memory or a collision with other allocated areas of the address space (depending on the architecture). When the stack is exhausted, the operating system can terminate the program abnormally. This behavior can be exploited, and an attacker can cause a denial-of-service attack if he or she can control or influence the amount of stack memory allocated.
Recommendation |
---|
Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEM05-C | Medium | Likely | Medium | P12 | L1 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CodeSonar |
| IO.TAINT.SIZE MISC.MEM.SIZE.BAD | Tainted Allocation Size Unreasonable Size Argument | ||||||
| STACK_USE | Can help detect single stack allocations that are dangerously large, although it will not detect excessive stack use resulting from recursion | |||||||
Helix QAC |
| C1051, C1520, C3670 | |||||||
Klocwork |
| MISRA.FUNC.RECUR | |||||||
LDRA tool suite |
| 44 S | Enhanced Enforcement | ||||||
Parasoft C/C++test |
| CERT_C-MEM05-a |
1 (low)
1 (unlikely)
2 (medium)
P2
L3
References
-b | Do not use recursion | ||||||||
PC-lint Plus |
| 9035, 9070 | Partially supported: reports use of variable length arrays and recursion | ||||||
Polyspace Bug Finder |
| Checks for:
Rec. partially covered. | |||||||
PVS-Studio |
| V505 |
Related Vulnerabilities
Stack overflow has been implicated in Toyota unintended acceleration cases, where Camry and other Toyota vehicles accelerated unexpectedly. Michael Barr testified at the trial that a stack overflow could corrupt the critical variables of the operating system, because they were located in memory adjacent to the top of the stack [Samek 2014].
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
SEI CERT C++ Coding Standard | VOID MEM05-CPP. Avoid large stack allocations |
ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013 | Recursion [GDL] |
MISRA C:2012 | Rule 17.2 (required) |
Bibliography
[Loosemore 2007] | Section 3.2.5, "Automatic Storage with Variable Size" |
[Samek 2014] | Are We Shooting Ourselves in the Foot with Stack Overflow? Monday, February 17th, 2014 by Miro Samek |
[Seacord 2013] | Chapter 4, "Dynamic Memory Management" |
...
\[[Sprundel 06|http://ilja.netric.org/files/Unusual%20bugs.pdf]\] "Stack Overflow" Wiki Markup