When iterating over elements of a container, the iterators used must iterate over a valid range. An iterator range is a pair of iterators that refer to the first and past-the-end elements of the range respectively.
A valid iterator range has all of the following characteristics:
- Both iterators
...
- refer into the same container
...
- .
An iterator range is a pair of iterators first and last that refer to the first element and the one-past-the-end-th element of the range, respectively. It is required that last be reachable from first by repeated increments of first.
Non-Compliant Code Example
- The iterator representing the start of the range precedes the iterator representing the end of the range.
- The iterators are not invalidated, in conformance with CTR51-CPP. Use valid references, pointers, and iterators to reference elements of a container.
An empty iterator range (where the two iterators are valid and equivalent) is considered to be valid.
Using a range of two iterators that are invalidated or do not refer into the same container results in undefined behavior.
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant In this non-compliant example, the two iterators that delimit the range point into the same container, but the first iterator doesn't actually does not precede the second.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
for_each( c.end(), c.begin(), Something );
|
On On each iteration of its internal loop, std::for_each
compares ()
compares the first iterator (after incrementing it) with the second for equality, and as ; as long as they are not equal, it will continue to increment the first iterator. Of course, no matter how many times you increment the first iterator, it will never equal the second, so the loop is essentially endless. In practice, this will, at best, fall off the end of the container c
and crash immediately with a memory protection fault. At worst, it will just fall off the end into uncharted memory and possibly read or change values that aren't part of the container. It's not that much different in principle from our infamous and eminently attackable friend the buffer overrun.Incrementing the iterator representing the past-the-end element of the range results in undefined behavior.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
void f(const std::vector<int> &c) {
std::for_each(c.end(), c.begin(), [](int i) { std::cout << i; });
} |
Invalid iterator ranges can also Invalid iterator ranges can result from comparison functions that return true for equal values. See STL32See CTR57-CPP. Use a Valid Ordering Rule and Meyers 01.
Non-Compliant Code Example
Provide a valid ordering predicate for more information about comparators.
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, the iterator values passed to std::for_each()
are passed in the proper order.The second common case arises when the iterators point into different containers:
Code Block | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <vector> void f(const std::vector<int> &c) { std:: for_each( c.begin(), dc.end(), Something [](int i) { std::cout << i; }); |
The results are similar to the first non-compliant code example.
} |
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, iterators from different containers are passed for the same iterator range. Although many STL implementations will compile this code and the program may behave as the developer expects, there is no requirement that an STL implementation treat a default-initialized iterator as a synonym for the iterator returned by end()
.
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
void f(const std::vector<int> &c) {
std::vector<int>::const_iterator e;
std::for_each(c.begin(), e, [](int i) { std::cout << i; });
} |
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, the proper iterator generated by a call to end()
is passed.
...
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <algorithm> #include <iostream> #include <vector> void f(const std::vector<int> &c) { std::for_each( c.begin(), c.end(), Something [](int i) { std::cout << i; }); } |
Risk Assessment
Using an invalid iterator range is similar to allowing a buffer overflow, which can lead to an attacker running arbitrary code.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|
CTR53-CPP |
3 (high)
2 (probable)
High | Probable | High | P6 | L2 |
References
Wiki Markup |
---|
\[[Sutter 05|AA. C++ References#Sutter 05]\] Item 83: Use a checked STL implementation.
\[[Meyers 01|AA. C++ References#Meyers 01]\] Item 21: Always have comparison functions return false for equal values.
\[[ISO/IEC 14882-2003|AA. C++ References#ISO/IEC 14882-2003]\] Section 24: Iterators Library. |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Astrée |
| overflow_upon_dereference | |||||||
CodeSonar |
| LANG.MEM.BO | Buffer Overrun | ||||||
Helix QAC |
| C++3802 | |||||||
Parasoft C/C++test |
| CERT_CPP-CTR53-a | Do not use an iterator range that isn't really a range | ||||||
Polyspace Bug Finder |
| CERT C++: CTR53-CPP | Checks for invalid iterator range (rule partially covered). | ||||||
PVS-Studio |
| V539, V662, V789 |
Related Vulnerabilities
In Fun with erase(), Chris Rohlf discusses the exploit potential of a program that calls vector::erase()
with invalid iterator ranges [Rohlf 2009].
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
SEI CERT C++ Coding Standard | CTR51-CPP. Use valid references, pointers, and iterators to reference elements of a container CTR57-CPP. Provide a valid ordering predicate |
Bibliography
[ISO/IEC 14882-2014] | Clause 24, "Iterators Library" |
[Meyers 2001] | Item 32, "Follow Remove-Like Algorithms with erase If You Really Want to Remove Something" |
...
STL30-CPP. Do not use iterators invalidated by container modification 14. Templates and the STL (STL) STL32-CPP. Use a Valid Ordering Rule