According to C99 \[[ISO/IEC 9899-1999|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 9899-1999]\] Section 6.7.3, "Type qualifiers," Paragraph 5:An object that has volatile-qualified type may be modified in ways unknown to the implementation or have other unknown side effects. Referencing a volatile object by using a non-volatile lvalue is undefined behavior. The C Standard, 6.7.4 paragraph 7 [ISO/IEC 9899:2024], states Wiki Markup
If an attempt is made to refer to an object defined with a volatile-qualified type through use of an lvalue with non-volatile-qualified type, the behavior is undefined.
This also applies to objects that behave as if they were defined with qualified types, such as an object at a memory-mapped input/output address.
...
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, a volatile object is accessed through a non-volatile-qualified reference, resulting in undefined behavior.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <stdio.h> void func(void) { static volatile int **ipp; static int *ip; static volatile int i = 0; printf("i = %d.\n", i); ipp = &ip; /* May produce a warning diagnostic */ ipp = (int**) &ip; /* constraintConstraint violation; may produce a warning diagnostic */ *ipp = &i; /* validValid */ if (*ip != 0) { /* validValid */ /* ... */ } } |
The assignment ipp = &ip
is unsafe not safe because it would allow allows the valid code that follows to reference the value of the volatile object i
through the non-volatile-qualified reference ip
. In this example, the compiler may optimize out the entire if
block because it is not possible that i *ip != 0
if i
must be false if the object to which ip
points is not volatile.
Implementation Details
This example compiles without warning on Microsoft Visual Studio 2013 when compiled in C mode (/TC
) but causes errors when compiled in C++ .NET mode (2003) and on MS Visual Studio 2005.
This example does not compile on MS Visual Studio 2008. The error message is
Code Block |
---|
error C2440: '=' : cannot convert from 'int **' to 'volatile int **'
|
/TP
).
GCC 4.8.1 generates a warning but compiles successfullyVersion 3.2.2 and Version 4.1.3 of the GCC compiler generate a warning, but they compile.
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, ip
is declared as volatile
.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <stdio.h> void func(void) { static volatile int **ipp; static volatile int *ip; static volatile int i = 0; printf("i = %d.\n", i); ipp = &ip; *ipp = &i; if (*ip != 0) { /* ... */ } } |
Risk Assessment
Accessing an object with a volatile object through -qualified type through a reference with a non-volatile reference can result in undefined and perhaps unintended program -qualified type is undefined behavior.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXP32-C | Low | Likely | Medium | P6 | L2 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Astrée |
| pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile-implicit | Supported indirectly via MISRA C 2012 Rule 11.8 | ||||||
Axivion Bauhaus Suite |
| CertC-EXP32 | Fully implemented | ||||||
Clang |
| -Wincompatible-pointer-types-discards-qualifiers | |||||||
Compass/ROSE | |||||||||
Coverity |
| MISRA C |
1 (low)
3 (likely)
2 (medium)
P6
2012 Rule 11.8 | Implemented | ||||||||
Cppcheck Premium |
| premium-cert-exp32-c | Partially implemented | ||||||
GCC |
| Can detect violations of this rule when the | |||||||
Helix QAC |
| C0312, C0562, C0563, C0673, C0674 | Fully implemented | ||||||
Klocwork |
| CERT.EXPR.VOLATILE.ADDR | Fully implemented | ||||||
LDRA tool suite |
| 344 S | Partially implemented | ||||||
Parasoft C/C++test |
| CERT_C-EXP32-a | A cast shall not remove any 'const' or 'volatile' qualification from the type of a pointer or reference | ||||||
Polyspace Bug Finder |
| Checks for cast to pointer that removes const or volatile qualification (rule fully covered) | |||||||
RuleChecker |
| pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile-implicit | Supported indirectly via MISRA C 2012 Rule 11.8 |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
References
Wiki Markup |
---|
\[[ISO/IEC 9899-1999|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 9899-1999]\] Section 6.7.3, "Type qualifiers," and Section 6.5.16.1, "Simple assignment"
\[[ISO/IEC PDTR 24772|AA. C References#ISO/IEC PDTR 24772]\] "HFC Pointer casting and pointer type changes"
\[[MISRA 04|AA. C References#MISRA 04]\] Rule 11.5 |
Related Guidelines
Key here (explains table format and definitions)
Taxonomy | Taxonomy item | Relationship |
---|---|---|
ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013 | Pointer Casting and Pointer Type Changes [HFC] | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013 | Type System [IHN] | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
MISRA C:2012 | Rule 11.8 (required) | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
CERT C | EXP55-CPP. Do not access a cv-qualified object through a cv-unqualified type | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
Bibliography
[ISO/IEC 9899:2024] | 6.7.4, "Type Qualifiers" |
...
EXP31-C. Do not modify constant values 03. Expressions (EXP) EXP33-C. Do not reference uninitialized variables