String literals are The type of a narrow string literal is an array of char, and the type of a wide string literal is an array of wchar_t. However, string literals (of both types) are notionally constant and should consequently be protected by the const qualification. This recommendation supports rule is a specialization of DCL00-C. Const-qualify immutable objects and also supports STR30-C. Do not attempt to modify string literals.

Non-Compliant Code Example

Adding const qualification may propagate through a program; as const qualifiers are added, still more become necessary. This phenomenon is sometimes called const-poisoning. Const-poisoning can frequently lead to violations of EXP05-C. Do not cast away a const qualification. Although const qualification is a good idea, the costs may outweigh the value in the remediation of existing code.

Noncompliant Code Example (Narrow String Literal)

In this noncompliant code exampleIn the following non-compliant code, the const keyword has been omitted.:

char *c = "Hello"; 

Wiki MarkupIf a statement such as {{c\[0\] = 'C'}} were placed following the above declaration, the code would likely still compile cleanly, but the result of the assignment is undefined as string literals are considered declaration in the noncompliant code example, the code is likely to compile cleanly, but the result of the assignment would be undefined because string literals are considered constant.

Compliant Solution

...

(Immutable Strings)

In this compliant solution, the characters referred to by the pointer c are const-qualified, meaning that any attempts attempt to assign them to different values is an error. :

const 
char const *c = "Hello"; 

Compliant Solution

...

(Mutable Strings)

In cases where the string is meant to be modified, use initialization instead of assignment. In this compliant solution, c is a modifiable char array which that has been initialized using the contents of the corresponding string literal.:

char c[] = "Hello";

Thus, a statement such as {{c\[0\] = 'C'}} is valid and will do what is expected.

Non-Compliant Code Example 1

Consequently, a statement such as c[0] = 'C' is valid and behaves as expected.

Noncompliant Code Example (Wide String Literal)

In this noncompliant code example, the const keyword has been omitted:Although this code example is not compliant with the C99 Standard, it executes correctly if the contents of CMUfullname are not modified.

wchar_t
char *CMUfullnamec = L"Carnegie Mellon University";
char *school;

/* Get school from user input and validate */

if (strcmp(school, "CMU")) {
    school = CMUfullname;
}

Non-Compliant Code Example 2

Adding in the const keyword will likely generate a compiler warning, as the assignment of CMUfullname to school discards the const qualifier. Any modifications to the contents of school after this assignment will lead to errors.

char const *CMUfullname = "Carnegie Mellon University";
char *school;

/* Get school from user input and validate */

if (strcmp(school, "CMU")) {
    school = CMUfullname;
}

Compliant Solution

The compliant solution uses the const keyword to protect the string literal, as well as using strcpy() to copy the value of CMUfullname into school, allowing future modification of school.

...

Hello";

If a statement such as c[0] = L'C' were placed following this declaration, the code is likely to compile cleanly, but the result of the assignment would be undefined because string literals are considered constant.

Compliant Solution (Immutable Strings)

In this compliant solution, the characters referred to by the pointer c are const-qualified, meaning that any attempt to assign them to different values is an error:

wchar_t const *c = L"Hello";

Compliant Solution (Mutable Strings)

In cases where the string is meant to be modified, use initialization instead of assignment. In this compliant solution, c is a modifiable wchar_t array that has been initialized using the contents of the corresponding string literal:

wchar_t c[] = L"Hello";

Consequently, a statement such as c[0] = L'C' is valid and behaves as expected.

...

Risk Assessment

Modifying string literals causes undefined behavior, resulting in abnormal program termination and denial-of-service vulnerabilities.

Automated Detection

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

References:

Bibliography

...

Image Added Image Added Image Added Wiki Markup[http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/1993/N0389.asc] \[[ISO/IEC 9899-1999:TC2|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 9899-1999TC2]\] Section 6.7.8, "Initialization" \[Lockheed Martin 2005\] Lockheed Martin. Joint Strike Fighter Air Vehicle C+\+ Coding Standards for the System Development and Demonstration Program. Document Number 2RDU00001, Rev C. December 2005.     AV Rule 151.1