Programmers frequently make errors regarding the precedence rules of operators due to the unintuitive low-precedence levels of {{&}}, {{\|}}, {{\^}}, {{<<}}, and {{>>}}. Mistakes regarding precedence rules can be avoided by the suitable use of parentheses. Defensive use of parentheses, if not taken to excess, also improves code readability. The precedence of operations by the order of the subclauses are defined in the Java Tutorials \[[Tutorials 08|AA. Java References#Tutorials 08]\].operators because of the unintuitively low precedence levels of Wiki Markup &
, |
, ^
, <<
, and >>
. Avoid mistakes regarding precedence through the suitable use of parentheses, which also improves code readability. The precedence of operations by the order of the subclauses is defined in the Java Tutorials [Tutorials 2013].
Although it The recommendation EXP30-J. Do not depend on operator precedence while using expressions containing side-effects advises against depending on parentheses for specifying the evaluation order, however this advice is applicable evaluation order EXP05-J. Do not follow a write by a subsequent write or read of the same object within an expression applies only to expressions that contain side - effects.
Noncompliant Code Example
The intent of the expression in this noncompliant code example is to add the variable OFFSET
with to the result of the bitwise logical AND between x
and MASK
.:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public static final int MASK = 1337;
public static final int OFFSET = -1337;
public static int computeCode(int x) {
return x & MASK + OFFSET;
}
|
According to the operator precedence rulesguidelines, the expression is parsed as the following:
Code Block |
---|
x & (MASK + OFFSET)
|
This expression gets is evaluated as shown belowfollows, resulting in the value 0.:
Code Block |
---|
x & (1337 - 1337)
|
Compliant Solution
In this This compliant solution , uses parentheses are used to ensure that the expression evaluates as expected.is evaluated as intended:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public static final int MASK = 1337; public static final int OFFSET = -1337; public static int computeCode(int x) { return (x & MASK) + OFFSET; } |
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, the intent is to append either "0" or "1" to the string "value=
":
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public class PrintValue { public static void main(String[] args) { String s = null; // Prints "1" System.out.println("value=" + s == null ? 0 : 1); } } |
Exceptions
However, the precedence rules result in the expression to be printed being parsed as ("value=" + s) == null ? 0 : 1
.
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution uses parentheses to ensure that the expression evaluates as intended:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public class PrintValue {
public static void main(String[] args) {
String s = null;
// Prints "value=0" as expected
System.out.println("value=" + (s == null ? 0 : 1));
}
}
|
Applicability
Mistakes regarding precedence guidelines can cause an expression to be evaluated in an unintended way, which can lead to unexpected and abnormal program behavior.
Parentheses may be omitted from mathematical expressions that follow the algebraic precedence rulesEXP00-EX1: Mathematical expressions that follow algebraic order do not require parentheses. For instance, consider the following expression:
Code Block |
---|
x + y * z
|
By mathematical convention, multiplication is performed before addition. Consequently, parentheses may prove to be ; parentheses are redundant in this case.:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
x + (y * z)
|
Risk Assessment
Mistakes regarding precedence rules may cause an expression to be evaluated in an unintended way. This can lead to unexpected and abnormal program behavior.
Recommendation | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXP09- J | low | probable | medium | P4 | L3 |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Other Languages
This rule appears in the C Coding Standard as EXP00-C. Use parentheses for precedence of operation.
This rule appears in the C++ Secure Coding Standard as EXP00-CPP. Use parentheses for precedence of operation.
References
Wiki Markup |
---|
\[[Tutorials 08|AA. Java References#Tutorials 08]\] [Expressions, Statements, and Blocks|http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/java/nutsandbolts/expressions.html], [Operators|http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/java/nutsandbolts/operators.html]
\[[ESA 05|AA. Java References#ESA 05]\] Rule 65: Use parentheses to explicitly indicate the order of execution of numerical operators |
Detection of all expressions using low-precedence operators without parentheses is straightforward. Determining the correctness of such uses is infeasible in the general case, although heuristic warnings could be useful.
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parasoft Jtest |
| CERT.EXP53.APAREN | Use '()' to separate complex expressions | ||||||
SonarQube |
| S864 |
Bibliography
[ESA 2005] | Rule 65, Use parentheses to explicitly indicate the order of execution of numerical operators |
...
EXP08-J. Be aware of integer promotions in binary operators 04. Expressions (EXP) EXP30-J. Do not depend on operator precedence while using expressions containing side-effects