According to the The Java Language Specification (JLS), §12.4, "Initialization of Classes and Interfaces" [JLS 2005]: Wiki Markup
Initialization of a class consists of executing its
static
initializers and the initializers forstatic
fields (class variables) declared in the class.
Therefore, the presence of a static field triggers the initialization of a class. However, the initializer of a static field could depend on the initialization of another class, possibly creating an initialization cycle.
The JLS also states in §8 Specification \[[JLS 2005|AA. Bibliography#JLS 05]\], Section 8.3.2.1, "Initializers for Class Variables" [JLS 2005]:
At ...at run time,
static
variables that arefinal
and that are initialized with compile-time constant values are initialized first.
While this statement typically holds, it can be misleading as it does not account for This statement does not apply to instances that use values of static final fields that are initialized at a later stage. Even if Declaring a field is to be static final , is insufficient to guarantee that it is not necessarily fully initialized before being read.
Programs in general should—and security-sensitive programs must—eliminate all class initialization cycles.
Noncompliant Code Example (Intraclass Cycle)
This noncompliant code example contrives to calculate the account balance by subtracting the processing fee from the deposited amount, but fails to do so. The Cycle
class object c
is instantiated before the deposit
field gets initialized. contains an intraclass initialization cycle:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public class Cycle { private final int balance; private static final Cycle c = new Cycle(); private final int balance; private static final int deposit = (int) (Math.random() * 100); // Random deposit public Cycle() { balance = deposit - 10; // Subtract processing fee } public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("The account balance is: " + c.balance); } } |
The Cycle
class declares a private static final
class variable, which is initialized to a new instance of the Cycle
class. Static initializers are guaranteed to be invoked once before the first use of a static class member or the first invocation of a constructor.
The programmer's intent is to calculate the account balance by subtracting the processing fee from the deposited amount. However, the initialization of the c
class variable happens before the runtime initialization of the deposit
field because it appears lexically before the initialization of the deposit
field. Consequently, the value of deposit
seen by the constructor, when invoked during the static initialization of c
, is As a result, the constructor Cycle()
is invoked which computes the balance based on the initial value of deposit
(0) rather than the random value. As a result, the balance is always remains computed to be -10
.
Wiki Markup |
---|
According to the Java Language Specification \[[JLS 2005|AA. Bibliography#JLS 05]\], Section 12.4, "Initialization of Classes and Interfaces" |
Initialization of a class consists of executing its
static
initializers and the initializers forstatic
fields (class variables) declared in the class.
Wiki Markup |
---|
This statement asserts that the presence of a {{static}} field triggers the initialization of a class, however, in this example, a recursive attempt is being made to initialize the class already. Because such recursive attempts are ignored by the JVM, the default value of {{deposit}} is {{0}} during the initialization \[[Bloch 2005|AA. Bibliography#Bloch 05]\]. |
Step 3 of the detailed initialized procedure described in JLS §12.4.2 [JLS 2014] permits implementations to ignore the possibility of such recursive initialization cycles.
Compliant Solution (Intraclass Cycle)
...
This compliant solution changes the initialization order of the class Cycle
so that the fields meant to be used in computations get duly are initialized without creating any dependency cycles. Specifically, the initialization of c
is placed lexically after the initialization of deposit
so that it occurs temporally after deposit
is fully initialized.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public class Cycle { private final int balance; private static final int deposit = (int) (Math.random() * 100); // Random deposit private static final Cycle c = new Cycle(); // Inserted after initialization of required fields public Cycle() { balance = deposit - 10; // Subtract processing fee } public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("The account balance is: " + c.balance); } } |
As Such initialization cycles can become insidious when many classes fields are involved, proper care must be taken to inspect the control flow, so it is important to ensure that the control flow lacks such cycles.
Although this compliant solution prevents the initialization cycle, it depends on declaration order and is consequently fragile; later maintainers of the software may be unaware that the declaration order must be maintained to preserve correctness. Consequently, such dependencies must be clearly documented in the code.
Noncompliant Code Example
...
(Interclass Cycle)
This noncompliant code example uses an inner class that extends the outer class. The outer class in turn, uses the {{static}} instance of the inner class. This results in a circular initialization issue \[[Findbugs 2008|AA. Bibliography#Findbugs 08]\].
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public class CircularClassInit {
static class InnerClassSingleton extends CircularClassInit {
static final InnerClassSingleton singleton = new InnerClassSingleton();
}
static final CircularClassInit foo = InnerClassSingleton.singleton;
}
|
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution removes the instance of the inner class from the outer class.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
public class CircularClassInit {
static class InnerClassSingleton extends CircularClassInit {
static final InnerClassSingleton singleton = new InnerClassSingleton();
}
}
|
...
noncompliant code example declares two classes with static variables whose values depend on each other. The cycle is obvious when the classes are seen together (as here) but is easy to miss when viewing the classes separately.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
class A {
public static final int a = B.b + 1;
// ...
}
class B {
public static final int b = A.a + 1;
// ...
}
|
The initialization order of the classes can vary, causing computation of different values for A.a
and B.b
. When class A
is initialized first, A.a
will have the value 2, and B.b
will have the value 1. These values will be reversed when class B
is initialized first.
Compliant Solution (Interclass Cycle)
This compliant solution breaks the interclass cycle by eliminating the dependency of A
on B
:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
class A {
public static final int a = 2;
// ...
}
class B {
public static final int b = A.a + 1;
// ...
}
|
With the cycle broken, the initial values will always be A.a = 2
and B.b = 3
regardless of initialization order.
Noncompliant Code Example
The programmer in this noncompliant code example attempts to initialize a static variable in one class using a static method in a second class, but that method in turn relies on a static method in the first class:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
class A {
public static int a = B.b();
public static int c() { return 1; }
}
class B {
public static int b() { return A.c(); }
}
|
This code correctly initializes A.a
to 1, using the Oracle JVM, regardless of whether A
or B
is loaded first. However, the JLS does not guarantee A.a
to be properly initialized. Furthermore, the initialization cycle makes this system harder to maintain and more likely to break in surprising ways when modified.
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution moves the c()
method into class B
, breaking the cycle:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
class A {
public static int a = B.b();
}
class B {
public static int b() { return B.c(); }
public static int c() { return 1; }
}
|
Risk Assessment
Initialization cycles may lead to unexpected results.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|
DCL00-J |
Low |
Unlikely |
Medium | P2 | L3 |
Automated Detection
...
TODO
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Other Languages
...
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CodeSonar |
| JAVA.STRUCT.UA JAVA.STRUCT.UA.DEFAULT | Useless Assignment (Java) Useless Assignment to Default (Java) | ||||||
Parasoft Jtest |
| CERT.DCL00.ACD | Ensure that files do not contain cyclical dependencies | ||||||
PVS-Studio |
| V6050 | |||||||
SonarQube |
| Classes should not access their own subclasses during initialization |
Related Guidelines
...
Bibliography
...
Initialization of Variables [LAV] | |
CWE-665, Improper Initialization |
Bibliography
Puzzle 49, "Larger than Life" | |
[JLS 2005] |
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Interfaces|http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/execution.html#12.4] Puzzle 49: Larger Than Life \[[MITRE 2009|AA. Bibliography#MITRE 09]\] [CWE ID 665|http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/665.html] "Improper Initialization"MSC06-J. Avoid memory leaks 49. Miscellaneous (MSC) MSC08-J. Avoid cyclic dependencies between packages