Page History

During initialization of a shared object, the object must be accessible only to the thread constructing it. However, the object can be published safely (that is, made visible to other threads) once its initialization is complete. The Java memory model (JMM) allows multiple threads to observe the object after its initialization has begun but before it has concluded. Consequently, programs must prevent publication of partially initialized objects.

This rule prohibits publishing a reference to a partially initialized member object instance before initialization has concluded. It specifically applies to safety in multithreaded code. TSM01-J. Do not let the this reference escape during object construction prohibits the this reference of the current object from escaping its constructor. OBJ11-J. Be wary of letting constructors throw exceptions describes the consequences of publishing partially initialized objects even in single-threaded programs.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example constructs a Helper object in the initialize() method of the Foo class. The Helper object's fields are initialized by its constructor.

class Foo {
  private Helper helper;

  public Helper getHelper() {
    return helper;
  }

  public void initialize() {
    helper = new Helper(42);
  }
}

public class Helper {
  private int n;

  public Helper(int n) {
    this.n = n;
  }
  // ...
}

If a thread were to access helper using the getHelper() method before the initialize() method executed, the thread would observe an uninitialized helper field. Later, if one thread calls initialize() and another calls getHelper(), the second thread could observe one of the following:

• The helper reference as null
• A fully initialized Helper object with the n field set to 42
• A partially initialized Helper object with an uninitialized n, which contains the default value 0

In particular, the JMM permits compilers to allocate memory for the new Helper object and to assign a reference to that memory to the helper field before initializing the new Helper object. In other words, the compiler can reorder the write to the helper instance field and the write that initializes the Helper object (that is, this.n = n) so that the former occurs first. This can expose a race window during which other threads can observe a partially initialized Helper object instance.

There is a separate issue: if more than one thread were to call initialize(), multiple Helper objects would be created. This is merely a performance issue—correctness would be preserved. The n field of each object would be properly initialized and the unused Helper object (or objects) would eventually be garbage-collected.

Compliant Solution (Synchronization)

Appropriate use of method synchronization can prevent publication of references to partially initialized objects, as shown in this compliant solution:

class Foo {
  private Helper helper;

  public synchronized Helper getHelper() {
    return helper;
  }

  public synchronized void initialize

Declaring an object volatile to ensure visibility of the most up-to-date object state does not work without the use of explicit synchronization in cases where the object is not thread-safe.

In the absence of synchronization, the effect of declaring an object {{volatile}} is that multiple threads which see the new object reference never see a partially initialized object. However, this holds only when the object is "effectively immutable" \[[Goetz 07|AA. Java References#Goetz 07]\], that is, its state cannot be directly or indirectly changed after the object is initialized or published. 

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example declares an instance field of type Map as volatile. The field can be mutated using a setter method putData().

public class Container<K,V> {
  volatile Map<K,V> map;

  public Container() {
    maphelper = new HashMap<K,V>Helper(42);	
  }
}

Synchronizing both methods guarantees that they cannot execute concurrently. If one thread were to call initialize() just before another thread called getHelper(), the synchronized initialize() method would always finish first. The synchronized keywords establish a happens-before relationship between the two threads. Consequently, the thread calling getHelper() would see either the fully initialized Helper object or an absent Helper object (that is, helper would contain a null reference). This approach guarantees proper publication both for immutable and mutable members.

Compliant Solution (Final Field)

The JMM guarantees that the fully initialized values of fields that are declared final are safely published to every thread that reads those values at some point no earlier than the end of the object's constructor.

class Foo {
  private final Helper helper;

  public VHelper getgetHelper(Object k) {
    return map.get(k)helper;
  }

  public Foo() {
    // Point 1
    helper = new Helper(42);
    // Point 2
  }
}

However, this solution requires the assignment of a new Helper instance to helper from Foo's constructor. According to The Java Language Specification, §17.5.2, "Reading Final Fields During Construction" [JLS 2015]:

A read of a final field of an object within the thread that constructs that object is ordered with respect to the initialization of that field within the constructor by the usual happens-before rules. If the read occurs after the field is set in the constructor, it sees the value the final field is assigned; otherwise, it sees the default value.

Consequently, the reference to the helper instance should remain unpublished until the Foo class's constructor has completed (see TSM01-J. Do not let the this reference escape during object construction for additional information).

Compliant Solution (Final Field and Thread-Safe Composition)

Some collection classes provide thread-safe access to contained elements. When a Helper object is inserted into such a collection, it is guaranteed to be fully initialized before its reference is made visible. This compliant solution encapsulates the helper field in a Vector<Helper>.

class Foo {
  private final Vector<Helper> helper;

  public Foo() {
    helper = new Vector<Helper>( void putData(K key, V value) {
    // Perform validation of value
    map.put(key, value);
  }
}

  public classHelper ClientgetHelper() {
   public void doSomething(if (helper.isEmpty()) {
    Container con = new Containerinitialize();
    //}
  This needs to see the fully constructed object not just the referencereturn helper.elementAt(0);
  }

  public synchronized void initialize() {
    if (con.map != nullhelper.isEmpty()) { 
      // ... helper.add(new Helper(42));
    }
  }
}

The helper field is declared final to guarantee that the vector is always created before any accesses take place. It can be initialized safely by invoking the synchronized initialize() method, which ensures that only one Helper object is ever added to the vector. If invoked before initialize(), the getHelper() avoids the possibility of a null-pointer dereference by conditionally invoking initialize(). Although the isEmpty() call in getHelper() is made from an unsynchronized context (which permits multiple threads to decide that they must invoke initialize) race conditions that could result in addition of a second object to the vector are nevertheless impossible. The synchronized initialize() method also checks whether helper is empty before adding a new Helper object, and at most one thread can execute initialize() at any time. Consequently, only the first thread to execute initialize() can ever see an empty vector and the getHelper() method can safely omit any synchronization of its own.

Compliant Solution (Static Initialization)

In this compliant solution, the helper field is initialized statically, ensuring that the object referenced by the field is fully initialized before its reference becomes visible:

// Immutable Foo
final class Foo 	{
  private static }final Helper helper = new Helper(42);

  public static Helper getHelper() {
    return helper;
  }
}

Even if the client thread sees the new reference, the object state that it observes may change in the meantime. Because the object is not effectively immutable, it is unsafe for use in a multi-threaded environment.

Compliant Solution (final)

The helper field should be declared final to document the class's immutability.

According to JSR-133, Section 9.2.3, "Static Final Fields" [JSR-133 2004]:

The rules for class initialization ensure that any thread that reads a static field will be synchronized with the static initialization of that class, which is the only place where static final fields can be set. Thus, no special rules in the JMM are needed for static final fields.

Compliant Solution (Immutable Object - Final Fields, Volatile Reference)

The JMM guarantees that any final fields of an object are fully initialized before a published object becomes visible [Goetz 2006a]. By declaring n final, the Helper class is made immutable. Furthermore, if the helper field is declared volatile in compliance with VNA01-J. Ensure visibility of shared references to immutable objects, Helper's reference is guaranteed to be made visible to any thread that calls getHelper() only after Helper has been fully initializedThis compliant solution declares the Map instance as final because the semantics of final dictate that the object will be immediately visible after initialization.

class Foo {
  private volatile Helper helper;

  public Helper getHelper()
public class Container<K,V> {
  final  Map<K,V>return maphelper;
  }

  public void Containerinitialize() {
    maphelper = new HashMap<K,V>Helper(42);	
  }
}

// Immutable Helper
public V get(Object k final class Helper {
  private final int n;

  public Helper(int n) {
    this.n return map.get(k)= n;
  }
  // ...
}

The obvious drawback of this solution is that the setter method cannot be accommodated if the goal is to ensure immutability. The Container and Map class are both effectively immutable in this case because the Map instance can only be manipulated via one of the setters whilst there is none here. The words effectively immutable are used instead of immutable because the Map instance is technically mutable but restricted here so that it has all the immutability properties. The Map class does not have any static methods that can be used to change its state, so the effective immutability property is enforced.

Compliant Solution (volatile)

It follows from the previous compliant solution that it is safe to declare the object volatile because it is effectively immutable.

This compliant solution requires that helper be declared volatile and that class Helper is immutable. If the helper field were not volatile, it would violate VNA01-J. Ensure visibility of shared references to immutable objects.

Providing a public static factory method that returns a new instance of Helper is both permitted and encouraged. This approach allows the Helper instance to be created in a private constructor.

Compliant Solution (Mutable Thread-Safe Object, Volatile Reference)

When Helper is mutable but thread-safe, it can be published safely by declaring the helper field in the Foo class volatile:

class Foo {
  private volatile Helper helper;

  public Helper getHelper() {
    return helper;
  }

  public void initialize() {
    helper = new Helper(42);
  }
}

// Mutable but thread-safe Helper
public class Helper {
  private volatile int n;
  private final Object lock = new Object();

  public Helper(int n) {
    this.n = n;

public class Container<K,V> {
  volatile Map<K,V> map;

  public Container() {
    map = new HashMap<K,V>();	
  }

  public Vvoid getsetN(Objectint kvalue) {
    returnsynchronized map.get(k);lock) {
      n = value;
    }
  }
}

Compliant Solution (synchronization)

This compliant solution uses explicit synchronization to ensure thread safety. It declares the object volatile to guard retrievals that use the getter method. A synchronized setter method is used to set the value of the Map object.

Synchronization is required to ensure the visibility of mutable members after initial publication because the Helper object can change state after its construction. This compliant solution synchronizes the setN() method to guarantee the visibility of the n field.

If the Helper class were synchronized incorrectly, declaring helper volatile in the Foo class would guarantee only the visibility of the initial publication of Helper; the visibility guarantee would exclude visibility of subsequent state changes. Consequently, volatile references alone are inadequate for publishing objects that are not thread-safe.

If the helper field in the Foo class is not declared volatile, the n field must be declared volatile to establish a happens-before relationship between the initialization of n and the write of Helper to the helper field. This is required only when the caller (class Foo) cannot be trusted to declare helper volatile.

Because the Helper class is declared public, it uses a private lock to handle synchronization in conformance with LCK00-J. Use private final lock objects to synchronize classes that may interact with untrusted code.

Exceptions

TSM03-J-EX0: Classes that prevent partially initialized objects from being used may publish partially initialized objects. This could be implemented, for example, by setting a volatile Boolean flag in the last statement of the initializing code and checking whether the flag is set before allowing class methods to execute.

The following compliant solution shows this technique:

public class Helper {
  private int n;
  private volatile boolean initialized; // Defaults to false

public class Container<K,V> {
  volatile Map<K,V> map;

  public ContainerHelper(int n) {
    mapthis.n = new HashMap<K,V>();	 n;
    this.initialized = true;
  }

  public Vvoid getdoSomething(Object k) {
    returnif map.get(k!initialized);
  }
 {
      throw new SecurityException(
  public synchronized void putData(K key, V value) {
 "Cannot use  // Perform validation of value
partially initialized instance");
    }
    // map.put(key, value);
  }...
  }
  // ...
}

This compliant solution has the advantage that it can accommodate the setter method. Declaring the object as volatile for safe publication using getter methods is cheaper in terms of performance, than declaring the getters as synchronized. However, it is mandatory to synchronize the setter methodstechnique ensures that if a reference to the Helper object instance were published before its initialization was complete, the instance would be unusable because each method within Helper checks the flag to determine whether the initialization has finished.

Risk Assessment

Failing Failure to synchronize access to shared mutable data can cause different threads to observe different states of the object or to observe a partially initialized object.

Automated Detection

TODO

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

References

\[[Goetz 07|AA. Java References#Goetz 07]\] Pattern #2: "one-time safe publication"

Bibliography

...

Image Added Image Added Image AddedFIO36-J. Do not create multiple buffered wrappers on an InputStream      09. Input Output (FIO)      09. Input Output (FIO)