Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

The C Standard identifies the following condition under which division and remainder operations result in undefined behavior (UB):

UBDescription

45

The value of the second operand of the / or % operator is zero (6.5.5).

Ensure that division and remainder operations do not result in Division and modulo operations are susceptible to divide-by-zero errors.

Division

The result of the / operator is the quotient from the division of the first arithmetic operand by the second arithmetic operand. Division operations are susceptible to divide-by-zero errors. Overflow can also occur during two's complement signed integer division when the dividend is equal to the minimum (most negative) value for the signed integer type and the divisor is equal to —1 −1. (see See INT32-C. Ensure that operations on signed integers do not result in overflow.).

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example can result in prevents signed integer overflow in compliance with INT32-C. Ensure that operations on signed integers do not result in overflow but fails to prevent a divide-by-zero error during the division of the signed operands sl1 and sl2.operands s_a and s_b:

Code Block
bgColor#FFcccc
langc
#include <limits.h>
 
void func(signed long sl1, sl2,s_a, signed long s_b) {
  signed long result;
  if ((s_a == LONG_MIN) && (s_b == -1)) {
    /* Initialize sl1 and sl2Handle error */
  } else {
    result = sl1s_a / sl2;
s_b;
  }
  /* ... */
}

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution tests the suspect division operation to guarantee there is no possibility of divide-by-zero errors or signed overflow.:

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
langc
#include <limits.h>
 
void func(signed long sl1, sl2, result;

/* Initialize sl1 and sl2 */

if ( (sl2s_a, signed long s_b) {
  signed long result;
  if ((s_b == 0) || ( (sl1s_a == LONG_MIN) && (sl2s_b == -1) ) ) {
    /* handleHandle error condition */
  }
 else {
    result = sl1s_a / sl2s_b;
  }
  /* ... */
}

...

Remainder

The modulo remainder operator provides the remainder when two operands of integer type are divided. 

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example can result in example prevents signed integer overflow in compliance with INT32-C. Ensure that operations on signed integers do not result in overflow but fails to prevent a divide-by-zero error during the modulo remainder operation on the signed operands sl1 and sl2.operands s_a and s_b:

Code Block
bgColor#FFcccc
langc
#include <limits.h>
 
void func(signed long sl1, sl2,s_a, signed long s_b) {
  signed long result;
  if ((s_a == LONG_MIN) && (s_b == -1)) {
    /* InitializeHandle sl1error and sl2 */
  } else {
    result = sl1s_a % sl2;
s_b;
  }
  /* ... */
}

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution tests the suspect modulo operation remainder operand to guarantee there is no possibility of a divide-by-zero error or an overflow error.:

Code Block
bgColor#ccccff
langc
#include <limits.h>
 
void func(signed long sl1, sl2, result;

/* Initialize sl1 and sl2 */

if ( (sl2s_a, signed long s_b) {
  signed long result;
  if ((s_b == 0 ) || ( (sl1s_a == LONG_MIN) && (sl2s_b == -1) ) ) {
    /* handleHandle error condition */
  }
 else {
    result = sl1s_a % sl2s_b;
  }
  /* ... */
}

Risk Assessment

A divide-by-zero error can result in abnormal program termination and denial of service.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

INT33-C

low

Low

likely

Likely

medium

Medium

P6

L2

Automated Detection

Fortify SCA Version 5.0 with CERT C Rule Pack can detect violations of this rule.

...

Tool

Version

Checker

Description

Astrée
Include Page
Astrée_V
Astrée_V

int-division-by-zero

int-modulo-by-zero

Fully checked
Axivion Bauhaus Suite

Include Page
Axivion Bauhaus Suite_V
Axivion Bauhaus Suite_V

CertC-INT33
CodeSonar
Include Page
CodeSonar_V
CodeSonar_V
LANG.ARITH.DIVZERO
LANG.ARITH.FDIVZERO
Division by zero
Float Division By Zero
Compass/ROSE

Can detect some violations of this rule

...

(In particular, it ensures that all operations involving division or modulo are preceded by a check ensuring that the second operand is

...

nonzero.)

Coverity
Include Page
Coverity_V
Coverity_V

DIVIDE_BY_ZERO

Fully implemented
Cppcheck
Include Page
Cppcheck_V
Cppcheck_V
zerodiv
zerodivcond

Context sensitive analysis of division by zero
Not detected for division by struct member / array element / pointer data that is 0
Detected when there is unsafe division by variable before/after test if variable is zero

Cppcheck Premium

Include Page
Cppcheck Premium_V
Cppcheck Premium_V

zerodiv
zerodivcond

premium-cert-int33-c

Context sensitive analysis of division by zero
Not detected for division by struct member / array element / pointer data that is 0
Detected when there is unsafe division by variable before/after test if variable is zero
Helix QAC

Include Page
Helix QAC_V
Helix QAC_V

C2830

C++2830

DF2831, DF2832, DF2833


Klocwork
Include Page
Klocwork_V
Klocwork_V

DBZ.CONST
DBZ.CONST.CALL
DBZ.GENERAL
DBZ.ITERATOR
DBZ.ITERATOR.CALL


LDRA tool suite
Include Page
LDRA_V
LDRA_V

43 D, 127 D, 248 S, 629 S, 80 X

Partially implemented
Parasoft C/C++test
Include Page
Parasoft_V
Parasoft_V

CERT_C-INT33-a

Avoid division by zero
Parasoft Insure++

Runtime analysis
Polyspace Bug Finder

Include Page
Polyspace Bug Finder_V
Polyspace Bug Finder_V

CERT C: Rule INT33-C


Checks for:

  • Integer division by zero
  • Tainted division operand
  • Tainted modulo operand

Rule fully covered.

SonarQube C/C++ Plugin
Include Page
SonarQube C/C++ Plugin_V
SonarQube C/C++ Plugin_V
S3518
PVS-Studio

Include Page
PVS-Studio_V
PVS-Studio_V

V609
TrustInSoft Analyzer

Include Page
TrustInSoft Analyzer_V
TrustInSoft Analyzer_V

division_by_zero

Exhaustively verified (see one compliant and one non-compliant example).

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Other Languages

...

Related Guidelines

Key here (explains table format and definitions)

...

...

...

Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship
ISO/IEC TS 17961Integer division errors [diverr]Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship
CWE 2.11CWE-369, Divide By Zero2017-07-07: CERT: Exact

CERT-CWE Mapping Notes

Key here for mapping notes

CWE-682 and INT33-C

CWE-682 = Union( INT33-C, list) where list =


  • Incorrect calculations that do not involve division by zero


Bibliography

[Seacord 2013b]Chapter 5, "Integer Security"
[Warren 2002]Chapter 2, "Basics"


...

Image Added Image Added Image Added

References

Wiki Markup
\[[ISO/IEC 9899:1999|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 9899-1999]\] Section 6.5.5, "Multiplicative operators"
\[[MITRE 07|AA. C References#MITRE 07]\] [CWE ID 369|http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/369.html], "Divide By Zero"
\[[Seacord 05|AA. C References#Seacord 05]\] Chapter 5, "Integers"
\[[Warren 02|AA. C References#Warren 02]\] Chapter 2, "Basics"

Image Removed      04. Integers (INT)      INT34-C. Do not shift a negative number of bits or more bits than exist in the operand