Page History

Programmers often suppress checked exceptions . That is, they often catch exceptions with a catch block, with the catch body doing nothing or something trivial, such as printing the stack trace. Often the catch body will have a comment stating that the exception is explicitly being ignored.

Exceptions must be handled appropriately. There are few valid reasons for suppressing exceptions; the most common are cases where the client cannot be expected to recover from the underlying problem. In these cases, it is good practice to allow the exception to propagate outwards rather than to catch and suppress the exception.

Catching and suppressing exceptions is considered bad practice for several reasons. Exceptions disrupt the expected control flow of the application. For example, statements in the try block that follow the statement that caused the exception are skipped.

by catching exceptions with an empty or trivial catch block. Each catch block must ensure that the program continues only with valid invariants. Consequently, the catch block must either recover from the exceptional condition, re-throw rethrow the exception to allow a higher level of abstraction to attempt recoverythe next nearest enclosing catch clause of a try statement to recover, or throw an exception that is appropriate to the context of the catch block. When recovery is possible, any instructions inside the the try block whose execution is required must be moved outside the try block to ensure that they are executed.

Exceptions disrupt the expected control flow of the application. For example, no part of any expression or statement that occurs in the try block after the point from which the exception is thrown is evaluated. Consequently, exceptions must be handled appropriately. Many reasons for suppressing exceptions are invalid. For example, when the client cannot be expected to recover from the underlying problem, it is good practice to allow the exception to propagate outwards rather than to catch and suppress the exception.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example catches IOException but fails to handle simply prints the exception. 's stack trace:

try {
  //...
} catch (IOException ioe) { 
  // Ignore ioe.printStackTrace();
}

...

Printing the exception's stack trace can be useful for debugging purposes, but results in the resulting program execution that is equivalent to suppressing the exception. Printing the stack trace can also result in unintentionally leaking leak information about the structure and state of the process to an attacker .

try {
  //...
} catch (IOException ioe) { 
  ioe.printStacktrace();
}

Note that even though the application (see ERR01-J. Do not allow exceptions to expose sensitive information for more information). Note that even though this noncompliant code example reacts to the exception by printing out a stack trace, it then proceeds as though the exception were not thrown. That is, the future behavior of the application is unaffected by the throwing of the exception , other than the fact that statements being thrown except that any expressions or statements that occur in the try block after the statement that caused point from which the exception are skipped. The IOException indicates that an I/O operation attempted by the application failed; it is unlikely that assuming that the attempted operation succeeded will permit the application to operate correctlyis thrown are not evaluated.

Compliant Solution (Interactive)

This compliant solution attempts to recover from handles a FileNotFoundException by forcing requesting that the user to specify another file when a particular file cannot be found in the user-specific directory.name:

boolean volatile validFlag = false;
do {
  try {
    // ...
    // If requested file does not exist, throws FileNotFoundException
    // If requested file exists, sets a Boolean flag validFlag to true
    validFlag = true; 
  } catch (FileNotFoundException e) { 
    // Ask the user for a different filenamefile name
  }
} while (validFlag != true);
// Use the file

The user is To comply with ERR01-J. Do not allow exceptions to expose sensitive information, the user should only be allowed to access only files in a user-specific directory. This prevents any other IOException that escapes the loop from leaking potentially sensitive file system information. See guideline ERR06.

Compliant Solution (Exception Reporter)

Proper reporting of exceptional conditions is context-dependent. For example, GUI applications should report the exception in a graphical manner, such as in an error dialog box. Most library classes should be able to objectively determine how an exception should be reported to preserve modularity; they cannot rely on System.err, on any particular logger, or on the availability of the windowing environment. As a result, library classes that wish to report exceptions should specify the API they use to report exceptions. This compliant solution specifies both an interface for reporting exceptions, which exports the report() method, and a default exception reporter class that the library can use. The exception reporter can be overridden by subclasses.

public interface Reporter {
  public void report(Throwable t);
}

class ExceptionReporterPermission extends Permission {
  // ...
}

public class ExceptionReporter {

  // Exception reporter that prints the exception 
  // to the console (used as default)
  private static final Reporter PrintException = new Reporter() {
    public void report(Throwable t) {
      System.err.println(t.toString());
    }
  };

  // Stores the default reporter
  // The default reporter can be changed by the user
  private static Reporter Default = PrintException;

  // Helps change the default reporter back to 
  // PrintException in the future
  public static Reporter getPrintException() {
    return PrintException;
  }

  public static Reporter getExceptionReporter() {
    return Default;
  }

  // May throw a SecurityException (which is unchecked)
public static void setExceptionReporter(Reporter reporter) {
    // Custom permission
    ExceptionReporterPermission perm = new 
        ExceptionReporterPermission("exc.reporter"); 
    SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager();
    if (sm != null) {
      // Check whether the caller has appropriate permissions
      sm.checkPermission(perm);
    }
    // Change the default exception reporter
    Default = reporter; 
  }
}

The setExceptionReporter() method prevents hostile code from maliciously installing a more verbose reporter that leaks sensitive information or that directs exception reports to an inappropriate location, such as the attacker's computer, by limiting attempts to change the exception reporter to callers that have the custom permission ExceptionReporterPermission with target exc.reporter.

The library may subsequently use the exception reporter in catch clauses:

try {
  // ...
} catch (IOException warning) {
  ExceptionReporter.getExceptionReporter().report(warning);
  // Recover from the exception...
}

Any client code that possesses the required permissions can override the ExceptionReporter with a handler that logs the error or provides a dialog box, or both. For example, a GUI client using Swing may require exceptions to be reported using a dialog box:

ExceptionReporter.setExceptionReporter(new ExceptionReporter() {
  public void report(Throwable exception) {
    JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(frame,
                                  exception.toString,
                                  exception.getClass().getName(),
                                  JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE);
  }});

Compliant Solution (Subclass Exception Reporter and Filter-Sensitive Exceptions)

Sometimes exceptions must be hidden from the user for security reasons (see ERR01-J. Do not allow exceptions to expose sensitive information for additional information). In such cases, one acceptable approach is to subclass the ExceptionReporter class and add a filter() method in addition to overriding the default report() method.

class MyExceptionReporter extends ExceptionReporter {
  private static final Logger logger =
      Logger.getLogger("com.organization.Log");

  public static void report(Throwable t) {
    t = filter(t);
    if (t != null) {
      logger.log(Level.FINEST, "Loggable exception occurred", t);
    }
  }

  public static Exception filter(Throwable t) {
    if (t instanceof SensitiveException1) {
      // Too sensitive, return nothing (so that no logging happens)
      return null;
    } else if (t instanceof SensitiveException2) {
      // Return a default insensitive exception instead
      return new FilteredSensitiveException(t);
    }
    // ...
    // Return for reporting to the user
    return t;
  }
}

 
// ...Definitions for SensitiveException1, SensitiveException2
// and FilteredSensitiveException...

The report() method accepts a Throwable instance and consequently handles all errors, checked exceptions, and unchecked exceptions. The filtering mechanism is based on a whitelisting approach wherein only nonsensitive exceptions are propagated to the user. Exceptions that are forbidden to appear in a log file can be filtered in the same fashion (see FIO13-J. Do not log sensitive information outside a trust boundary). This approach provides the benefits of exception chaining by reporting exceptions tailored to the abstraction while also logging the low-level cause for future failure analysis [Bloch 2008].

Noncompliant Code Example

If a thread is interrupted while sleeping or waiting, it causes a java.lang.InterruptedException to be thrown. But However, the run() method of interface Runnable cannot throw a checked exception , and so it must handle InterruptedException. This noncompliant code example catches and suppresses InterruptedException. :

class Foo implements Runnable {
  public void run() {
    try {
      Thread.sleep(1000);    
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
      // Ignore
    }
  }
}

...

This code prevents callers higher up the call stack from determining that an interrupted exception occurred; consequently, they are unable to act on the exception \[[Goetz 2006|AA. Bibliography#Goetz 06]\]. Likewise, if this code was called in its own thread, it prevents the calling thread from knowing that this thread was of the run() method from determining that an interrupted exception occurred. Consequently, caller methods such as Thread.start() cannot act on the exception [Goetz 2006]. Likewise, if this code were called in its own thread, it would prevent the calling thread from knowing that the thread was interrupted.

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution catches the InterruptedException and restores the interrupted status by calling the interrupt() method on the current thread. :

class Foo implements Runnable {
  public void run() {
    try {
      Thread.sleep(1000);    
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
      Thread.currentThread().interrupt(); // Reset interrupted status
    }
  }
}

...

Consequently, code that is higher up on the call stack calling methods (or code from a calling thread) can see determine that an interrupt was issued \[ [Goetz 2006|AA. Bibliography#Goetz 06]\].

Exceptions

EXC00ERR00-J-EX0: An exception that occurs within a catch or finally block may be suppressed, such as when closing a FileInputStream object. Exceptions that occur during the freeing of a resource may be suppressed in those cases where failure to free the resource cannot affect future program behavior. Examples of freeing resources include closing files, network sockets, shutting down threads, and so forth. Such resources are often freed in catch or finally blocks and never reused during subsequent execution. Consequently, the exception cannot influence future program behavior through any avenue other than resource exhaustion. When resource exhaustion is adequately handled, it is sufficient to sanitize and log the exception for future improvement; additional error handling is unnecessary in this case.

ERR00-JEXC00-EX1: When recovery from an exceptional condition is impossible at a particular abstraction level, code at that level should avoid handling must not handle that exceptional condition. In such cases, an appropriate exception must be thrown so that higher level code can catch the exceptional condition and can attempt recovery. The most common implementation for this case is to omit a catch block and consequently allow the exception to propagate normally, as shown below.:

// When recovery is possible at higher levels
private void doSomething() throws FileNotFoundException {
  // Requested file does not exist; throws FileNotFoundException
  // Higher level code can handle it by displaying a dialog box and asking 
  // the user for the file name
}

Some APIs may limit the permissible exceptions thrown by particular methods. In such cases, it may be necessary to catch an exception and either wrap it in a permitted exception or translate it to one of the permitted exceptions. Alternatively, when higher level code is also unable to recover from a particular exception, the checked exception may be wrapped in an unchecked exception and re-thrown.:

public void myMethod() throws MyProgramException {
  // ...
  try {
    // Requested file does not exist
    // User is unable to supply the file name
  } catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
  
  throw new IOExceptionMyProgramException(e);
  }

...

...

 // ...
}

Alternatively, when higher level code is also unable to recover from a particular exception, the checked exception may be wrapped in an unchecked exception and rethrown.

ERR00-J-EX2: An InterruptedException may be caught and suppressed when extending class Thread [Goetz 2006]. An interruption request may also be suppressed by code that implements a thread's interruption policy [Goetz 2006, p. 143only situation in which it is acceptable to swallow an interrupt is when you are extending Thread and therefore control all the code higher up on the call stack" \[[Goetz 2006|AA. Bibliography#Goetz 06]\]. In such cases {{InterruptedException}} may be caught and suppressed. A interruption request may also be suppressed by code that implements a thread's interruption policy \[[Goetz 2006, pg 143|AA. Bibliography#Goetz 06]\].

Risk Assessment

Ignoring or suppressing exceptions violates the fail-safe criteria of an application.can result in inconsistent program state.

Automated Detection

Detection of suppressed exceptions is straightforward. Sound determination of which specific cases represent violations of this guideline, rule and which represent permitted exceptions to the guideline rule is infeasible. Heuristic approaches may be effective.

Related Vulnerabilities

AMQ-1272

Bibliography

\[[Bloch 2008|AA. Bibliography#Bloch 08]\] Item 65: "Don't ignore exceptions", Item 62: "Document all exceptions thrown by each method"
\[[Goetz 2006|AA. Bibliography#Goetz 06]\] 5.4 Blocking and interruptible methods
\[[JLS 2005|AA. Bibliography#JLS 05]\] [Chapter 11, Exceptions|http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/exceptions.html]
\[[MITRE 2009|AA. Bibliography#MITRE 09]\]  [CWE ID 390|http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/390.html] "Detection of Error Condition Without Action"

describes a vulnerability in the ActiveMQ service. When ActiveMQ receives an invalid username and password from a Stomp client, a security exception is generated but is subsequently ignored, leaving the client connected with full and unrestricted access to ActiveMQ.

Related Guidelines

Bibliography

...

Image Added Image Added Image Added06. Exceptional Behavior (ERR)      06. Exceptional Behavior (ERR)      ERR01-J. Use a class dedicated to reporting exceptions