The type of a narrow string literal is an array of char
, and the type of a wide string literal is an array of wchar_t
. However, string literals (of both types) are notionally constant and should consequently be protected by const
qualification. This recommendation is a specialization of DCL00-C. Const-qualify immutable objects and also supports rule STR30-C. Do not attempt to modify string literals.
Adding const
qualification may propagate through a program; as you add const
qualifiers are added, still more become necessary. This phenomenon is sometimes called " const-poisoning. " Const-poisoning can frequently lead to violations of EXP05-C. Do not cast away a const qualification. While Although const
qualification is a good idea, the costs may outweigh the value in the remediation of existing code.
Noncompliant Code Example (
...
Narrow String Literal)
In the following this noncompliant code example, the const
keyword has been omitted.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
char *c = "Hello";
|
If a statement such as {{ Wiki Markup c
\[0
\]
=
'C'
}} were placed following the declaration in the Noncompliant Code Example, the code is likely to compile cleanly, but the result of the assignment is undefined as string literals are considered the noncompliant code example, the code is likely to compile cleanly, but the result of the assignment would be undefined because string literals are considered constant.
Compliant Solution (
...
Immutable Strings)
In this compliant solution, the characters referred to by the pointer c
are const
-qualified, meaning that any attempts attempt to assign them to different values is an error.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
const char *c = "Hello";
|
Compliant Solution (
...
Mutable Strings)
In cases where the string is meant to be modified, use initialization instead of assignment. In this compliant solution, c
is a modifiable wchar_t
char
array which that has been initialized using the contents of the corresponding string literal.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
char c[] = "Hello";
|
...
Consequently, a statement such as {{c
\[0
\]
=
'C'
}} is valid and behaves as expected.
Noncompliant Code Example (
...
Wide String Literal)
In the following this noncompliant code example, the const
keyword has been omitted.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
wchar_t *c = L"Hello";
|
...
If a statement such as {{c
\[0
\]
=
L'C'
}} were placed following the above this declaration, the code is likely to compile cleanly, but the result of the assignment is undefined as string literals are considered the assignment would be undefined because string literals are considered constant.
Compliant Solution (
...
Immutable Strings)
In this compliant solution, the characters referred to by the pointer c
are const
-qualified, meaning that any attempts attempt to assign them to different values is an error.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
wchar_t const *c = L"Hello";
|
Compliant Solution (
...
Mutable Strings)
In cases where the string is meant to be modified, use initialization instead of assignment. In this compliant solution, c
is a modifiable char
array which wchar_t
array that has been initialized using the contents of the corresponding string literal.:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
wchar_t c[] = L"Hello";
|
Consequently, a statement such as {{ Wiki Markup c
\[0
\]
=
L'C'
}} is valid and behaves as expected.
Risk Assessment
Modifying string literals causes undefined behavior, resulting in abnormal program termination and denial-of-service vulnerabilities.
Recommendation | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
STR05-C |
Low |
Unlikely |
Low | P3 | L3 |
Automated Detection
The LDRA tool suite V 7.6.0 can detect violations of this recommendation.
Compass/ROSE can detect violations of this recommendation.
Related Vulnerabilities
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Astrée |
| literal-assignment | Fully checked | ||||||
Axivion Bauhaus Suite |
| CertC-STR05 | |||||||
Clang |
| -Wwrite-strings | Not enabled by -Weverything | ||||||
CodeSonar |
| LANG.TYPE.NCS | Non-const string literal | ||||||
Compass/ROSE | |||||||||
| CC2.STR05 | Fully implemented | |||||||
GCC |
| -Wwrite-strings | |||||||
Helix QAC |
| C0752, C0753 | |||||||
Klocwork |
| MISRA.STRING_LITERAL.NON_CONST.2012 | |||||||
LDRA tool suite |
| 623 S | Fully implemented | ||||||
Parasoft C/C++test |
| CERT_C-STR05-a | A string literal shall not be modified | ||||||
PC-lint Plus |
| 1776 | Fully supported | ||||||
RuleChecker |
| literal-assignment | Fully checked |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
References:
Wiki Markup |
---|
\[[Corfield 93|AA. C References#Corfield 93]\]
\[[ISO/IEC 9899:1999|AA. C References#ISO/IEC 9899-1999]\] Section 6.7.8, "Initialization"
\[[Lockheed Martin 2005|AA. C References#Lockheed Martin 05]\] AV Rule 151.1 |
Bibliography
[Corfield 1993] | |
[Lockheed Martin 2005] | AV Rule 151.1 |
...
07. Characters and Strings (STR)