An object that has volatile-qualified type may be modified in ways unknown to the implementation or have other unknown side effects. Referencing a volatile object by using a nonvolatile value results in non-volatile lvalue is undefined behavior. The C Standard, subclause 6.7.3 4 paragraph 7 [ISO/IEC 9899:20112024], states:
If an attempt is made to refer to an object defined with a volatile-qualified type through use of an lvalue with non-volatile-qualified type, the behavior is undefined.
(See also undefined behavior 65 in Annex J of the C Standard.)
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, a volatile object is accessed through a non-volatile-qualified reference, resulting in undefined behavior:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <stdio.h> void func(void) { static volatile int **ipp; static int *ip; static volatile int i = 0; printf("i = %d.\n", i); ipp = &ip; /* ProducesMay warningsproduce ina modernwarning compilersdiagnostic */ ipp = (int**) &ip; /* Constraint violation; also produces warningsmay produce a warning diagnostic */ *ipp = &i; /* Valid */ if (*ip != 0) { /* Valid */ /* ... */ } } |
The assignment ipp = &ip
is unsafe not safe because it would allow allows the valid code that follows to reference the value of the volatile object i
through the non-volatile-qualified reference ip
. In this example, the compiler may optimize out the entire if
block because i *ip != 0
must be false if i
the object to which ip
points is not volatile.
Implementation Details
This example compiles without warning on Microsoft Visual Studio 2012 2013 when compiled in C mode (/TC
) but causes errors when compiled in C++ mode (/TP
).
GCC 4.8.1 generates a warning but compiles successfully.
...
In this compliant solution, ip
is declared volatile
:
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
#include <stdio.h> void func(void) { static volatile int **ipp; static volatile int *ip; static volatile int i = 0; printf("i = %d.\n", i); ipp = &ip; *ipp = &i; if (*ip != 0) { /* ... */ } } |
Risk Assessment
Casting away volatile allows access to Accessing an object with a volatile-qualified type through a nonvolatile reference and can result in undefined and perhaps unintended program reference with a non-volatile-qualified type is undefined behavior.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXP32-C | Low | Likely | Medium | P6 | L2 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Astrée |
| pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile-implicit | Supported indirectly via MISRA C 2012 Rule 11.8 | ||||||
Axivion Bauhaus Suite |
| CertC-EXP32 | Fully implemented | ||||||
Clang |
| -Wincompatible-pointer-types-discards-qualifiers | |||||||
Compass/ROSE |
Coverity |
| MISRA C 2012 Rule 11.8 | Implemented | ||||||
Cppcheck Premium |
| premium-cert-exp32-c | Partially implemented |
GCC |
|
Can detect violations of this rule when the | |||||||||
Helix QAC |
| C0312, C0562, C0563, C0673, C0674 | Fully implemented | ||||||
Klocwork |
| CERT.EXPR.VOLATILE.ADDR | Fully implemented | ||||||
LDRA tool suite |
| 344 S |
Fully implemented
Partially implemented | |||||||||
Parasoft C/C++test |
| CERT_C-EXP32-a | A cast shall not remove any 'const' or 'volatile' qualification from the type of a pointer or reference | ||||||
Polyspace Bug Finder |
| Checks for cast to pointer that removes const or volatile qualification (rule fully covered) | |||||||
RuleChecker |
| pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile-implicit | Supported indirectly via MISRA C 2012 Rule 11.8 |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
Key here (explains table format and definitions)
Taxonomy | Taxonomy item | Relationship |
---|
ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013 | Pointer Casting and Pointer Type Changes [HFC] | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013 | Type System [IHN] | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
MISRA C:2012 | Rule 11.8 (required) | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
CERT C | EXP55-CPP. Do not access a cv-qualified object through a cv-unqualified type | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
Bibliography
...
...