Do not expose references to mutable objects to client code. Never initialize such a field to a client-provided object reference or return the object reference from an accessor. Exposing a public static final object allows clients to modify the contents of the object (although they will not be able to change the object itself, as it is final).
This rule does not address private mutable objects, see rule OBJ05-J. Do not return references to private mutable class members for more information.
Noncompliant Code Example
Suppose that SomeType
is immutable.
public static final SomeType [] SOMETHINGS = { ... };
Even though SomeType
is immutable, this declaration allows the SOMETHINGS
array to be modified by untrusted clients of the code. Any element of the array can be assigned a new value, namely a reference to a new SomeType
object.
This noncompliant code example also violates OBJ01-J. Limit accessibility of fields.
Noncompliant Code Example (getter method)
This noncompliant code example complies with OBJ01-J. Limit accessibility of fields by declaring the array private.
Suppose that SomeType
is immutable.
private static final SomeType [] SOMETHINGS = { ... }; public static final getSomethings() {return SOMETHINGS;}
Even though SomeType
is immutable, the public getter method enables untrusted clients to modify the SOMETHINGS
array. Any element of the array can be assigned a new value, namely a reference to a new SomeType
object.
Compliant Solution (clone)
Continuing with the assumption that SomeType
is immutable, one approach is to have a private array and a public method that returns a copy of the array:
private static final SomeType [] SOMETHINGS = { ... }; public static final SomeType [] somethings() { return SOMETHINGS.clone(); }
Now, the original array cannot be modified by any client. If SomeType
were mutable, this approach would not be effective because the array clone references the same SomeType
objects as the SOMETHINGS
array. If the client modified the clone SomeType
objects directly, the SomeType
objects referenced by the SOMETHINGS
array would also change.
Compliant Solution (Unmodifiable List)
Continuing with the assumption that SomeType
is immutable, an alternative approach is to have a private array from which a public immutable list is constructed:
private static final SomeType [] THE_THINGS = { ... }; public static final List<SomeType> SOMETHINGS = Collections.unmodifiableList(Arrays.asList(THE_THINGS));
Now, neither the original array values nor the public list can be modified by a client. If SomeType
were mutable, this would not be effective because the list references the same SomeType
objects as the SOMETHINGS
array. The unmodifiabileList
prevents the list from being modified, not the elements in the list. If the client modified the list's SomeType
objects directly, the SomeType
objects referenced by the SOMETHINGS
array would also change.
Risk Assessment
Having a public static final array is a potential security risk because the array elements may be modified by a client.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OBJ13-J | Medium | Likely | Low | P18 | L1 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description |
---|---|---|---|
SonarQube | 9.9 |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this guideline on the CERT website.
References
[Bloch 2008] | Item 13, "Minimize the Accessibility of Classes and Members" |
[JLS 2015] | §6.6, "Access Control" |