An object that has volatile-qualified type may be modified in ways unknown to the implementation or have other unknown side effects. Referencing a volatile object by using a non-volatile lvalue is undefined behavior. The C Standard, 6.7.3 [ISO/IEC 9899:2011], states
If an attempt is made to refer to an object defined with a volatile-qualified type through use of an lvalue with non-volatile-qualified type, the behavior is undefined.
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, a volatile object is accessed through a non-volatile-qualified reference, resulting in undefined behavior:
#include <stdio.h> void func(void) { static volatile int **ipp; static int *ip; static volatile int i = 0; printf("i = %d.\n", i); ipp = &ip; /* May produce a warning diagnostic */ ipp = (int**) &ip; /* Constraint violation; may produce a warning diagnostic */ *ipp = &i; /* Valid */ if (*ip != 0) { /* Valid */ /* ... */ } }
The assignment ipp = &ip
is not safe because it allows the valid code that follows to reference the value of the volatile object i
through the non-volatile-qualified reference ip
. In this example, the compiler may optimize out the entire if
block because *ip != 0
must be false if the object to which ip
points is not volatile.
Implementation Details
This example compiles without warning on Microsoft Visual Studio 2013 when compiled in C mode (/TC
) but causes errors when compiled in C++ mode (/TP
).
GCC 4.8.1 generates a warning but compiles successfully.
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, ip
is declared volatile
:
#include <stdio.h> void func(void) { static volatile int **ipp; static volatile int *ip; static volatile int i = 0; printf("i = %d.\n", i); ipp = &ip; *ipp = &i; if (*ip != 0) { /* ... */ } }
Risk Assessment
Accessing an object with a volatile-qualified type through a reference with a non-volatile-qualified type is undefined behavior.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXP32-C | Low | Likely | Medium | P6 | L2 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Astrée | 24.04 | pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile-implicit | Supported indirectly via MISRA C 2012 Rule 11.8 |
Axivion Bauhaus Suite | 7.2.0 | CertC-EXP32 | Fully implemented |
Clang | 3.9 | -Wincompatible-pointer-types-discards-qualifiers | |
Compass/ROSE | |||
Coverity | 2017.07 | MISRA C 2012 Rule 11.8 | Implemented |
GCC | 4.3.5 | Can detect violations of this rule when the | |
LDRA tool suite | 9.7.1 | 344 S | Partially implemented |
Parasoft C/C++test | 2023.1 | CERT_C-EXP32-a | A cast shall not remove any 'const' or 'volatile' qualification from the type of a pointer or reference |
Polyspace Bug Finder | R2024a | Checks for cast to pointer that removes const or volatile qualification (rule fully covered) | |
PRQA QA-C | Unable to render {include} The included page could not be found. | 0312,562,563,673,674 | Fully implemented |
RuleChecker | 24.04 | pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile pointer-qualifier-cast-volatile-implicit | Supported indirectly via MISRA C 2012 Rule 11.8 |
Helix QAC | 2024.3 | C: 0312, 0562, 0563, 0673, 0674 |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
Key here (explains table format and definitions)
Taxonomy | Taxonomy item | Relationship |
---|---|---|
ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013 | Pointer Casting and Pointer Type Changes [HFC] | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013 | Type System [IHN] | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
MISRA C:2012 | Rule 11.8 (required) | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
CERT C | EXP55-CPP. Do not access a cv-qualified object through a cv-unqualified type | Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship |
Bibliography
[ISO/IEC 9899:2011] | 6.7.3, "Type Qualifiers" |