Narrower primitive types can be cast to wider types without any effect on the magnitude of numeric values. However, whereas integer types represent exact values, floating-point types have limited precision. Subclause 6.3.1.4 paragraph 2 of the C Standard [ISO/IEC 9899:2011] states:
When a value of integer type is converted to a real floating type, if the value being converted can be represented exactly in the new type, it is unchanged. If the value being converted is in the range of values that can be represented but cannot be represented exactly, the result is either the nearest higher or nearest lower representable value, chosen in an implementation-defined manner. If the value being converted is outside the range of values that can be represented, the behavior is undefined. Results of some implicit conversions may be represented in greater range and precision than that required by the new type (see 6.3.1.8 and 6.8.6.4).
Conversion from integral types to floating-point types without sufficient precision can lead to loss of precision (loss of least significant bits). No runtime exception occurs despite the loss.
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant example, an int
is converted to float
:
#include <stdio.h> int main() { int big = 1234567890; float approx = big; printf("%d\n", (big - (int)approx)); return 0; }
When compiled with GCC 4.8.1 on Linux, this program prints the value -46
.
Compliant Solution
This solution replaces the float
with a double
. Furthermore, it uses a static assertion to guarantee that the double
type can represent any int
without loss of precision. (See DCL03-C. Use a static assertion to test the value of a constant expression.)
#include <assert.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <float.h> #include <limits.h> static_assert(sizeof(int) * CHAR_BIT <= DBL_MANT_DIG); int main() { int big = 1234567890; double approx = big; printf("%d\n", (big - (int)approx)); return 0; }
On the same platform, this program prints 0
.
Risk Assessment
Casting numeric types to floating-point types can lose information.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLP36-C | Low | Unlikely | Medium | P2 | L3 |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
Bibliography
[ISO/IEC 9899:2011] | Subclause 6.3.1.4, "Real Floating and Integer" |