Do not use deprecated or obsolescent functions when more secure equivalent functions are available.
Deprecated functions are defined by the C99 standard and Technical Corrigenda. Obsolescent functions are defined by this guideline.
Deprecated Functions
The gets
function was deprecated by Technical Corrigendum 3.
Obsolescent Functions
The following functions are obsolescent and should be avoided in favor of either the portable equivalent or, if available, the more secure alternatives defined in [ISO/IEC TR 24731-1] Extensions to the C Library, — Part I: Bounds-checking interfaces, and [ISO/IEC TR 24731-2] Extensions to the C Library, — Part II: Dynamic Allocation Functions. (Several of the "Portable Equivalent" entries are specified in the POSIX standard.)
Function |
Portable Equivalent |
Secure Alternative |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, strcat()
and strcpy()
are used.
enum { BUFFERSIZE=256 }; void complain(const char *msg) { static const char prefix[] = "Error: "; static const char suffix[] = "\n"; char buf[BUFFERSIZE]; strcpy(buf, prefix); strcat(buf, msg); strcat(buf, suffix); fputs(buf, stderr); }
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, strcat()
and strcpy()
are replaced by strcat_s()
and strcpy_s()
.
enum { BUFFERSIZE=256 }; void complain(const char *msg) { static const char prefix[] = "Error: "; static const char suffix[] = "\n"; char buf[BUFFERSIZE]; strcpy_s(buf, BUFFERSIZE, prefix); strcat_s(buf, BUFFERSIZE, msg); strcat_s(buf, BUFFERSIZE, suffix); fputs(buf, stderr); }
Risk Assessment
The deprecated and obsolescent enumerated in this guideline are commonly associated with software vulnerabilities.
Rule |
Severity |
Likelihood |
Remediation Cost |
Priority |
Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSC34-C |
high |
probable |
medium |
P12 |
L1 |
Automated Detection
Unknown.
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
ISO/IEC 9899:1999 Section 7.21, "String handling <string.h
>"
MISRA Rule 20.4
Bibliography
[Burch 2006]
[CERT 2006c]
[Seacord 2005a] Chapter 2, "Strings"
Using deprecated or obsolescent functions shall be diagnosed because there exist equivalent functions that are more secure.
Deprecated functions are defined by the C99 standard and Technical Corrigenda. Obsolescent functions are defined by this guideline.
When an analyzer determines that an out-of-bounds store cannot occur in a specific invocation of a function, the invocation of that function is permitted by this guideline, and the analyzer is not required to produce any diagnostic.
Deprecated Functions
The gets
function was deprecated by Technical Corrigendum 3 to C99 and eliminated from C1X.
Obsolescent Functions
Functions in the first column of the following table are hereby defined to be obsolescent functions. To remediate invocations of obsolescent functions, an application might use inline coding that, in all respects, conforms to this guideline, or an alternative library that, in all respects, conforms to this guideline, or alternative non-obsolescent functions.
Obsolescent |
Recommended |
Rationale |
---|---|---|
|
|
Non-reentrant. |
|
|
No error detection. |
|
|
No error detection. |
|
|
No error detection. |
|
|
No error detection. |
|
|
Non-reentrant. |
|
|
No exclusive access to file. |
|
|
No exclusive access to file. |
|
|
No error detection. |
|
|
No error detection. |
The atof, atoi, atol
, and atoll
functions are obsolescent because the strod, strtof, strtol, strtold, strtoll, strotul
, and strtoull
functions can emulate their usage and have more robust error handling capabilities. See guideline INT05-C. Do not use input functions to convert character data if they cannot handle all possible inputs [CERT C Secure Coding Standard 2010].
The fopen
and freopen
functions are obsolescent because the fopen_s
and freopen_s
functions can emulate their usage and improve security by protecting the file from unauthorized access by setting its file protection and opening the file with exclusive access [ISO/IEC WG14 N1173].
The setbuf
function is obsolescent because setbuf
does not return a value and can be emulated using setvbuf
. See guideline FIO12-C. Prefer setvbuf() to setbuf() [CERT C Secure Coding Standard 2010].
The rewind
function is obsolescent because rewind
does not return a value and can be emulated using fseek
. See guideline FIO07-C. Prefer fseek() to rewind() [CERT C Secure Coding Standard 2010].
The asctime
and ctime
functions are obsolescent because they use non-reentrant static buffers and can be emulated using asctime_s
and ctime_s
.
Unchecked Obsolescent Functions
The following are hereby defined to be unchecked obsolescent functions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To remediate invocations of unchecked obsolescent functions, an application might use inline coding that, in all respects, conforms to this guideline, or an alternative library that, in all respects, conforms to this guideline, or alternative non-obsolescent functions from ISO/IEC TR 24731 (Part 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or alternative non-obsolescent functions from ISO/IEC DTR 24731-2 (Part 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, the obsolescent functions strcat
and strcpy
are used.
void complain(const char *msg) { static const char prefix[] = "Error: "; static const char suffix[] = "\n"; char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, prefix); strcat(buf, msg); strcat(buf, suffix); fputs(buf, stderr); }
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, the obsolescent function setbuf
is used.
FILE *file; /* Setup file */ setbuf(file, NULL); /* ... */
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, tmpnam
is used.
char file_name[L_tmpnam]; FILE *fp; if (!tmpnam(file_name)) { /* Handle error */ } /* A TOCTOU race condition exists here */ fp = fopen(file_name, "wb+"); if (fp == NULL) { /* Handle error */ }
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, tmpfile
is used.
FILE *fp = tmpfile(); if (fp == NULL) { /* Handle error */ }
Related Guidelines
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG11 Rationale for TR 24731 Extensions to the C Library Part I: Bounds-checking interfaces
ISO/IEC 9899:1999 Section 7.19.3, "Files," and Section 7.19.4, "Operations on Files," Section 7.19.5.5, "The setbuf
function"; 7.19.9.2, "The fseek
function"; 7.19.9.5 "The rewind
function"; and 7.21, "String handling <string.h>
," Section 7.20.1.4, "The strtol, strtoll, strtoul,
and strtoull
functions," and Section 7.19.6, "Formatted input/output functions," Section 7.21.5.8, "The strtok
function"
ISO/IEC TR 24772 "TRJ Use of Libraries"
MITRE CWE: CWE-73 "External Control of File Name or Path, "CWE-367, "Time-of-check Time-of-use Race Condition," CWE-676, "Use of Potentially Dangerous Function," CWE-192, "Integer Coercion Error," CWE-197, "Numeric Truncation Error," CWE-464, "Addition of Data Structure Sentinel," CWE-676, "Use of Potentially Dangerous Function," and CWE-20, "Insufficient Input Validation"
Bibliography
[Apple Secure Coding Guide] "Avoiding Race Conditions and Insecure File Operations"
[CERT C Secure Coding Standard 2010]"MSC34-C. Do not use deprecated or obsolescent functions", "FIO01-C. Be careful using functions that use file names for identification", "FIO07-C. Prefer fseek() to rewind()", "FIO12-C. Prefer setvbuf() to setbuf()", "INT05-C. Do not use input functions to convert character data if they cannot handle all possible inputs", "INT06-C. Use strtol() or a related function to convert a string token to an integer", "STR06-C. Do not assume that strtok() leaves the parse string unchanged", "STR07-C. Use TR 24731 for remediation of existing string manipulation code"
[Drepper 2006] Section 2.2.1 "Identification When Opening"
[Klein 2002]
[Linux 2007] strtok
(3)
[Open Group 2004] "The open
function"
[Seacord 2005a] Chapter 2, "Strings," and Chapter 7, "File I/O"
[Seacord 2005b]
49. Miscellaneous (MSC) MSC35-C. Do not include any executable statements inside a switch statement before the first case label