You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 89 Next »

As noted in undefined behavior 169 of Annex J of [[ISO/IEC 9899-1999]], the behavior a program is undefined when

the pointer argument to the free or realloc function does not match a pointer earlier returned by calloc, malloc, or realloc, or the space has been deallocated by a call to free or realloc.

Freeing memory multiple times has similar consequences to accessing memory after it is freed (see MEM30-C. Do not access freed memory). First, reading a pointer to deallocated memory is undefined because the pointer value is indeterminate and may have a trap representation . In the latter case, doing so may cause a hardware trap. When reading a freed pointer doesn't cause a trap, the underlying data structures that manage the heap can become corrupted in a way that can introduce security vulnerabilities into a program. These types of issues are referred to as double-free vulnerabilities. In practice, double-free vulnerabilities can be exploited to execute arbitrary code. VU#623332, which describes a double-free vulnerability in the MIT Kerberos 5 function krb5_recvauth(), is one example.

To eliminate double-free vulnerabilities, it is necessary to guarantee that dynamic memory is freed exactly one time. Programmers should be wary when freeing memory in a loop or conditional statement; if coded incorrectly, these constructs can lead to double-free vulnerabilities. It is also a common error to misuse the realloc() function in a manner that results in double-free vulnerabilities (see MEM04-C. Do not perform zero length allocations).

Noncompliant Code Example

In this noncompliant code example, the memory referred to by x may be freed twice: once if error_condition is true and again at the end of the code.

size_t num_elem = /* some initial value */;
int error_condition = 0;

int *x = (int *)malloc(num_elem * sizeof(int));
if (x == NULL) {
  /* handle allocation error */
}
/* ... */
if (error_condition == 1) {
  /* handle error condition*/
  free(x);
  x = NULL;
}
/* ... */
free(x);
x = NULL;

Compliant Solution

In this compliant solution, the free a referenced by x is only freed once. This is accomplished by eliminating the call to free() when error_condition is equal to 1.

size_t num_elem = /* some initial value */;
int error_condition = 0;

if (num_elem > SIZE_MAX/sizeof(int)) {
   /* Handle overflow */
}
int *x = (int *)malloc(num_elem * sizeof(int));
if (x == NULL) {
  /* handle allocation error */
}
/* ... */
if (error_condition == 1) {
  /* Handle error condition*/
}
/* ... */
free(x);
x = NULL;

Note that this solution checks for numeric overflow (see INT32-C. Ensure that operations on signed integers do not result in overflow).

Risk Assessment

Freeing memory multiple times can result in an attacker executing arbitrary code with the permissions of the vulnerable process.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

MEM31-C

high

probable

medium

P12

L1

Automated Detection

The LDRA tool suite Version 7.6.0 can detect violations of this rule.

Fortify SCA Version 5.0 can detect violations of this rule with the Double Free checker.

Splint Version 3.1.1 can detect violations of this rule.

The Coverity Prevent Version 5.0 RESOURCE_LEAK checker finds resource leaks from variables that go out of scope while owning a resource. USE_AFTER_FREE checker can find the instances where a freed memory is freed again. Coverity Prevent cannot discover all violations of this rule so further verification is necessary.

Compass/ROSE can detect some violations of this rule. In particular, false positives may be raised if a variable is freed by a different function than the one that allocated it. Also, it is unable to warn on cases where a call to free() happens inside of a for-loop.

Klocwork can detect violations of this rule with the MLK.* and UFM.FFM.* checkers.  See Klocwork Cross Reference

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Other Languages

This rule appears in the C++ Secure Coding Standard as MEM31-CPP. Free dynamically allocated memory exactly once.

References

[[ISO/IEC PDTR 24772]] "XYK Dangling Reference to Heap" and "XYL Memory Leak"
[[MIT 05]]
[[MITRE 07]] CWE ID 415, "Double Free"
[[OWASP, Double Free]]
[[Viega 05]] "Doubly freeing memory"
[[VU#623332]]


      08. Memory Management (MEM)      MEM32-C. Detect and handle memory allocation errors

  • No labels