The address of the FILE
object used to control a stream may be significant; a copy of a FILE
object need not serve in place of the original. Do not use a copy of a FILE object in any input/output operations.
Non-Compliant Code Example
This non-compliant code example can fail because a copy of stdout
is being used in the call to fputs()
.
#include <stdio.h> int main(void) { FILE my_stdout = *(stdout); fputs("Hello, World!\n", &my_stdout); return 0; }
Platform Specific Details
This non-compliant example does fails with an "access violation" when compiled under Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 and run on an IA-32 platform.
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, a copy of the pointer to the FILE
object is used in the call to fputs()
.
#include <stdio.h> int main(void) { FILE *my_stdout = stdout; fputs("Hello, World!\n", my_stdout); return 0; }
Risk Assessment
Using a copy of a FILE
object in place of the original is likely to result in a crash which can be used in a denial-of-service attack.
Rule |
Severity |
Likelihood |
Remediation Cost |
Priority |
Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIO38-C |
2 (medium) |
2 (probable) |
2 (medium) |
P8 |
L2 |
Examples of vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule can be found on the CERT website.
References
[[ISO/IEC 9899-1999]] Section 7.19.3, "Files"