Do not call a function with the wrong number or type of arguments.
The C Standard identifies five distinct situations in which undefined behavior (UB) may arise as a result of invoking a function using a declaration that is incompatible with its definition or by supplying incorrect types or numbers of arguments:
UB | Description |
A pointer is used to call a function whose type is not compatible with the referenced type (6.3.2.3). | |
For a call to a function without a function prototype in scope, the number of arguments does not equal the number of parameters (6.5.2.2). | |
For a call to a function without a function prototype in scope where the function is defined with a function prototype, either the prototype ends with an ellipsis or the types of the arguments after promotion are not compatible with the types of the parameters (6.5.2.2). | |
For a call to a function without a function prototype in scope where the function is not defined with a function prototype, the types of the arguments after promotion are not compatible with those of the parameters after promotion (with certain exceptions) (6.5.2.2). | |
A function is defined with a type that is not compatible with the type (of the expression) pointed to by the expression that denotes the called function (6.5.2.2). |
Functions that are appropriately declared (as in DCL40-C. Do not create incompatible declarations of the same function or object) will typically generate a compiler diagnostic message if they are supplied with the wrong number or types of arguments. However, there are cases in which supplying the incorrect arguments to a function will, at best, generate compiler warnings. Although such warnings should be resolved, they do not prevent program compilation. (See MSC00-C. Compile cleanly at high warning levels.)
Noncompliant Code Example
The header <tgmath.h>
provides type-generic macros for math functions. Although most functions from the <math.h>
header have a complex counterpart in <complex.h>
, several functions do not. Calling any of the following type-generic functions with complex values is undefined behavior.
Functions That Should Not Be Called with Complex Values
atan2() | erf | fdim | fmin | ilogb | llround | logb | nextafter | rint | tgamma |
cbrt | erfc | floor | fmod | ldexp | log10 | lrint | nexttoward | round | trunc |
ceil | exp2 | fma | frexp | lgamma | log1p | lround | remainder | scalbn | |
copysign | expm1 | fmax | hypot | llrint | log2 | nearbyint | remquo | scalbln |
This noncompliant code example attempts to take the base-2 logarithm of a complex number, resulting in undefined behavior:
#include <tgmath.h> void func(void) { double complex c = 2.0 + 4.0 * I; double complex result = log2(c); }
Compliant Solution (Complex Number)
If the clog2()
function is not available for an implementation as an extension, the programmer can take the base-2 logarithm of a complex number, using log()
instead of log2()
, because log()
can be used on complex arguments, as shown in this compliant solution:
#include <tgmath.h> void func(void) { double complex c = 2.0 + 4.0 * I; double complex result = log(c)/log(2); }
Compliant Solution (Real Number)
The programmer can use this compliant solution if the intent is to take the base-2 logarithm of the real part of the complex number:
#include <tgmath.h> void func(void) { double complex c = 2.0 + 4.0 * I; double complex result = log2(creal(c)); }
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant example, the C standard library function strchr()
is called through the function pointer fp
declared with a prototype with incorrectly typed arguments. According to the C Standard, 6.3.2.3, paragraph 8 [ISO/IEC 9899:2011]
A pointer to a function of one type may be converted to a pointer to a function of another type and back again; the result shall compare equal to the original pointer. If a converted pointer is used to call a function whose type is not compatible with the referenced type, the behavior is undefined.
#include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> char *(*fp)(); int main(void) { const char *c; fp = strchr; c = fp('e', "Hello"); printf("%s\n", c); return 0; }
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, the function pointer fp
, which points to the C standard library function strchr()
, is declared with the correct parameters and is invoked with the correct number and type of arguments:
#include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> char *(*fp)(const char *, int); int main(void) { const char *c; fp = strchr; c = fp("Hello",'e'); printf("%s\n", c); return 0; }
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant example, the function f()
is defined to take an argument of type long
but f()
is called from another file with an argument of type int
:
/* In another source file */ long f(long x) { return x < 0 ? -x : x; } /* In this source file, no f prototype in scope */ long f(); long g(int x) { return f(x); }
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, the prototype for the function f()
is included in the source file in the scope of where it is called, and the function f()
is correctly called with an argument of type long
:
/* In another source file */ long f(long x) { return x < 0 ? -x : x; } /* f prototype in scope in this source file */ long f(long x); long g(int x) { return f((long)x); }
Noncompliant Code Example (POSIX)
The POSIX function open()
[IEEE Std 1003.1:2013] is a variadic function with the following prototype:
int open(const char *path, int oflag, ... );
The open()
function accepts a third argument to determine a newly created file's access mode. If open()
is used to create a new file and the third argument is omitted, the file may be created with unintended access permissions. (See FIO06-C. Create files with appropriate access permissions.)
In this noncompliant code example from a vulnerability in the useradd()
function of the shadow-utils
package CVE-2006-1174, the third argument to open()
is accidentally omitted:
fd = open(ms, O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC);
Technically, it is incorrect to pass a third argument to open() when not creating a new file (that is, with the O_CREAT flag not set).
Compliant Solution (POSIX)
In this compliant solution, a third argument is specified in the call to open()
:
#include <fcntl.h> void func(const char *ms, mode_t perms) { /* ... */ int fd; fd = open(ms, O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC, perms); if (fd == -1) { /* Handle error */ } }
Risk Assessment
Calling a function with incorrect arguments can result in unexpected or unintended program behavior.
Rule | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXP37-C | Medium | Probable | High | P4 | L3 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description |
---|---|---|---|
CodeSonar | 8.1p0 | LANG.FUNCS.APM | Array parameter mismatch |
Compass/ROSE | Can detect some violations of this rule. In particular, it ensures that all calls to | ||
1.2 | CC2.EXP37 | Partially implemented | |
EDG | |||
GCC | 4.3.5 | Can detect violation of this rule when the | |
Klocwork | 2024.3 | MISRA.FUNC.UNMATCHED.PARAMS | |
LDRA tool suite | 9.7.1 | 41 D, 21 S, 98 S, 170 S, 496 S, 576 S | Partially implemented |
Polyspace Bug Finder | R2016a | Mismatch between function or variable declarations Variable qualifier is lost during conversion
Argument to a standard function does not meet requirements for use in the function
String specifiers do not match corresponding arguments Function pointer cast to another function pointer with different argument or return type | |
PRQA QA-C++ | 4.1 | 0424, 0403 | |
PRQA QA-C | Unable to render {include} The included page could not be found. | 1331, 1332, 1333, 3002, 3320, 3335 | Partially implemented |
SonarQube C/C++ Plugin | 3.11 | S930 | Detects incorrect argument count |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
CERT C Secure Coding Standard | DCL07-C. Include the appropriate type information in function declarators |
ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013 | Subprogram Signature Mismatch [OTR] |
ISO/IEC TS 17961 | Calling functions with incorrect arguments [argcomp] |
MISRA C:2012 | Rule 8.2 (required) Rule 17.3 (mandatory) |
MITRE CWE | CWE-628, Function Call with Incorrectly Specified Arguments |
Bibliography
[CVE] | CVE-2006-1174 |
[ISO/IEC 9899:2011] | 6.3.2.3, "Pointers" 6.5.2.2, "Function Calls" |
[IEEE Std 1003.1:2013] | open() |
[Spinellis 2006] | Section 2.6.1, "Incorrect Routine or Arguments" |