An object that has volatile-qualified type may be modified in ways unknown to the implementation or have other unknown side effects. It is possible to reference a volatile object by using a non-volatile value, but the resulting behavior is undefined. According to ISO/IEC 9899:1999, Section 6.7.3 "Type Qualifiers":
If an attempt is made to refer to an object defined with a volatile-qualified type through use of an lvalue with non-volatile-qualified type, the behavior is undefined.
(See also undefined behavior 62 of Appendix J.)
Noncompliant Code Example
In this example, a volatile object is accessed through a non-volatile-qualified reference, resulting in undefined behavior.
static volatile int **ipp; static int *ip; static volatile int i = 0; printf("i = %d.\n", i); ipp = &ip; /* produces warnings in modern compilers */ ipp = (int**) &ip; /* constraint violation, also produces warnings */ *ipp = &i; /* valid */ if (*ip != 0) { /* valid */ /* ... */ }
The assignment ipp = &ip
is unsafe because it would allow the valid code that follows to reference the value of the volatile object i
through the non-volatile qualified reference ip
. In this example, the compiler may optimize out the entire if
block because it is not possible that i != 0
if i
is not volatile.
Implementation Details
This example compiles without warning on Microsoft Visual C++ .NET (2003) and on MS Visual Studio 2005.
This example does not compile on MS Visual Studio 2008. The error message is
error C2440: '=' : cannot convert from 'int **' to 'volatile int **'
Version 3.2.2 and Version 4.1.3 of the GCC compiler generate a warning but compile successfully.
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, ip
is declared volatile.
static volatile int **ipp; static volatile int *ip; static volatile int i = 0; printf("i = %d.\n", i); ipp = &ip; *ipp = &i; if (*ip != 0) { /* ... */ }
Risk Assessment
Casting away volatile allows access to an object through a non-volatile reference. This can result in undefined and perhaps unintended program behavior.
Rule |
Severity |
Likelihood |
Remediation Cost |
Priority |
Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXP32-C |
low |
likely |
medium |
P6 |
L2 |
Automated Detection
Tool |
Version |
Checker |
Description |
---|---|---|---|
GCC |
4.3.5 |
|
can detect violations of this rule when the |
Compass/ROSE |
|
|
|
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
C++ Secure Coding Standard: EXP32-CPP. Do not access a volatile object through a non-volatile reference
Bibliography
[ISO/IEC 9899:1999] Section 6.7.3, "Type qualifiers," and Section 6.5.16.1, "Simple assignment"
[ISO/IEC PDTR 24772] "HFC Pointer casting and pointer type changes" and "IHN Type system"
[MISRA 2004] Rule 11.5
EXP31-C. Avoid side effects in assertions 03. Expressions (EXP) EXP33-C. Do not reference uninitialized memory