EXP36-C. Do not convert pointers into more strictly aligned pointer types

Different alignments are possible for different types of objects. If the type-checking system is overridden by an explicit cast or the pointer is converted to a void pointer (void *) and then to a different type, the alignment of an object may be changed.

According to C99, Section 6.3.2.3, p7

A pointer to an object or incomplete type may be converted to a pointer to a different object or incomplete type. If the resulting pointer is not correctly aligned for the pointed-to type, the behavior is undefined.

(See also undefined behavior 22 of Annex J.)

If the misaligned pointer is dereferenced, the program may terminate abnormally. The cast alone may cause a loss of information, even if the value is not dereferenced. For example, the following code is not guaranteed to work conforming C99 implementations, even though no pointers are dereferenced:

char c = 'x';
int *ip = (int *)&c; /* this can lose information */
char *cp = (char *)ip;
assert(cp == &c);    /* will fail on some conforming implementations */

On some implementations cp will not match &c.

As a result, if a pointer to one object type is converted to a pointer to a different object type, the second object type must not require stricter alignment than the first.

Noncompliant Code Example

C99 (and C90) allows a pointer to be cast into and out of void *. As a result, it is possible to silently convert from one pointer type to another without the compiler diagnosing the problem by storing or casting a pointer to void * and then storing or casting it to the final type. In this noncompliant code example, the type checking system is circumvented due to the caveats of void pointers.

char *loop_ptr;
int *int_ptr;

int *loop_function(void *v_pointer) {
  /* ... */
  return v_pointer;
}
int_ptr = loop_function(loop_ptr);

This example compiles without warning. However, v_pointer may be aligned on a one-byte boundary.

Compliant Solution

Because the input parameter directly influences the return value, and loop_function() returns an int *, the formal parameter v_pointer is redeclared to only accept int *.

int *loop_ptr;
int *int_ptr;

int *loop_function(int *v_pointer) {
  /* ... */
  return v_pointer;
}
int_ptr = loop_function(loop_ptr);

Another solution is to ensure that loop_ptr points to an object returned by malloc() because this object is guaranteed to be aligned properly for any need. However, this is a subtlety that is easily missed when the program is modified in the future. It is easier and safer to let the type system document the alignment needs.

Noncompliant Code Example

Many architectures requires that pointers are correctly aligned when accessing objects bigger than a byte. There are, however, many places in system code where you receive unaligned data (e.g., the network stacks) that needs to be copied to a properly aligned memory location such as in this noncompliant code example.

char *data;
struct foo_header *tmp;
struct foo_header *header;

tmp = data + offset;
memcpy(&header, tmp, sizeof(header));

if (header.len < FOO)
/* ... */

Unfortunately, the behavior is undefined when you assign an unaligned value to a pointer that points to a type that need to be aligned. An implementation may notice, for example, that tmp and header must be aligned, so it may use an inlined memcpy() that uses instructions that assumes aligned data.

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution does not use the foo_header pointer.

char *data;
struct foo_header header;

memcpy(&header, data + offset, sizeof(header));

if (header.len < FOO)
/* ... */

Risk Assessment

Accessing a pointer or an object that is no longer on the correct access boundary can cause a program to crash or give wrong information, or may cause slow pointer accesses (if the architecture allows misaligned accesses).

Automated Detection

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Related Guidelines

C++ Secure Coding Standard: EXP36-CPP. Do not convert pointers into more strictly aligned pointer types

Bibliography

[Walfridsson 2003] Krister Walfridsson. Aliasing, pointer casts and gcc 3.3. August, 2003.
[Bryant 2003]
[ISO/IEC 9899:1999] Section 6.2.5, "Types"
[ISO/IEC PDTR 24772] "HFC Pointer casting and pointer type changes"
[MISRA 2004] Rules 11.2 and 11.3

EXP35-C. Do not access or modify an array in the result of a function call after a subsequent sequence point      03. Expressions (EXP)      EXP37-C. Call functions with the arguments intended by the API