Sensitive data stored in reusable resources may be inadvertently leaked to a less privileged user or attacker if not properly cleared. Examples of reusable resources include
- Dynamically allocated memory
- Statically allocated memory
- Automatically allocated (stack) memory
- Memory caches
- Disk
- Disk caches
The manner in which sensitive information can be properly cleared varies depending on the resource type and platform.
Noncompliant Code Example (free()
)
Dynamic memory managers are not required to clear freed memory and generally do not because of the additional runtime overhead. Furthermore, dynamic memory managers are free to reallocate this same memory. As a result, it is possible to accidentally leak sensitive information if it is not cleared before calling a function that frees dynamic memory. Programmers also cannot rely on memory being cleared during allocation. (See void MEM09-C. Do not assume memory allocation functions initialize memory.)
To prevent information leakage, sensitive information must be cleared from dynamically allocated buffers before they are freed. Calling free()
on a block of dynamic memory causes the space to be deallocated; that is, the memory block is made available for future allocation. However, the data stored in the block of memory to be recycled may be preserved. If this memory block contains sensitive information, that information may be unintentionally exposed.
In this example, sensitive information stored in the dynamically allocated memory referenced by secret
is copied to the dynamically allocated buffer, new_secret
, which is processed and eventually deallocated by a call to free()
. Because the memory is not cleared, it may be reallocated to another section of the program where the information stored in new_secret
may be unintentionally leaked.
char *secret; /* Initialize secret */ char *new_secret; size_t size = strlen(secret); if (size == SIZE_MAX) { /* Handle error */ } new_secret = (char *)malloc(size+1); if (!new_secret) { /* Handle error */ } strcpy(new_secret, secret); /* Process new_secret... */ free(new_secret); new_secret = NULL;
Compliant Solution
To prevent information leakage, dynamic memory containing sensitive information should be sanitized before being freed. Sanitization is commonly accomplished by clearing the allocated space (that is, filling the space with '\0'
characters).
char *secret; /* Initialize secret */ char *new_secret; size_t size = strlen(secret); if (size == SIZE_MAX) { /* Handle error */ } /* Use calloc() to zero-out allocated space */ new_secret = (char *)calloc(size+1, sizeof(char)); if (!new_secret) { /* Handle error */ } strcpy(new_secret, secret); /* Process new_secret... */ /* Sanitize memory */ memset_s(new_secret, '\0', size); free(new_secret); new_secret = NULL;
The calloc()
function ensures that the newly allocated memory has also been cleared. Because sizeof(char)
is guaranteed to be 1, this solution does not need to check for a numeric overflow as a result of using calloc()
. (See MEM07-C. Ensure that the arguments to calloc(), when multiplied, do not wrap.)
See MSC06-C. Beware of compiler optimizations for a definition and discussion of using the memset_s()
function.
Noncompliant Code Example (realloc()
)
Reallocating memory using realloc()
can have the same problem as freeing memory. The realloc()
function deallocates the old object and returns a pointer to a new object. Using realloc()
to resize dynamic memory may inadvertently expose sensitive information, or it may allow heap inspection, as described in Fortify Taxonomy: Software Security Errors [Fortify 2006] and NIST's Source Code Analysis Tool Functional Specification [Black 2007].
In this example, when realloc()
is called, it may allocate a new, larger object, copy the contents of secret
to this new object, free()
the original object, and assign the newly allocated object to secret
. However, the contents of the original object may remain in memory.
char *secret; /* Initialize secret */ size_t secret_size = strlen(secret); /* ... */ if (secret_size > SIZE_MAX/2) { /* Handle error condition */ } else { secret = (char *)realloc(secret, secret_size * 2); }
The secret_size
is tested to ensure that the integer multiplication (secret_size * 2
) does not result in an integer overflow. (See INT30-C. Ensure that unsigned integer operations do not wrap.)
Compliant Solution
A compliant program cannot rely on realloc()
because it is not possible to clear the memory before the call. Instead, a custom function must be used that operates similarly to realloc()
but sanitizes sensitive information as heap-based buffers are resized. Again, sanitization is done by overwriting the space to be deallocated with '\0'
characters.
char *secret; /* Initialize secret */ size_t secret_size = strlen(secret); char *temp_buff; /* ... */ if (secret_size > SIZE_MAX/2) { /* Handle error condition */ } /* calloc() initializes memory to zero */ temp_buff = (char *)calloc(secret_size * 2, sizeof(char)); if (temp_buff == NULL) { /* Handle error */ } memcpy(temp_buff, secret, secret_size); /* Sanitize the buffer */ memset((volatile char *)secret, '\0', secret_size); free(secret); secret = temp_buff; /* Install the resized buffer */ temp_buff = NULL;
The calloc()
function ensures that the newly allocated memory is also cleared. Because sizeof(char)
is guaranteed to be 1, this solution does not need to check for a numeric overflow as a result of using calloc()
. (See MEM07-C. Ensure that the arguments to calloc(), when multiplied, do not wrap.)
Risk Assessment
In practice, this type of security flaw can expose sensitive information to unintended parties. The Sun tarball vulnerability discussed in Secure Coding Principles & Practices: Designing and Implementing Secure Applications [Graf 2003] and Sun Security Bulletin #00122 [Sun 1993] shows a violation of this recommendation, leading to sensitive data being leaked. Attackers may also be able to leverage this defect to retrieve sensitive information using techniques such as heap inspection.
Recommendation | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEM03-C | Medium | Unlikely | High | P2 | L3 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description |
---|---|---|---|
CodeSonar | 8.1p0 | (customization) | Users can add a custom check for use of realloc() . |
|
| Could detect possible violations of this rule by first flagging any usage of | |
2024.3 | SV.USAGERULES.UNINTENDED_COPY |
| |
LDRA tool suite | 9.7.1 | 44 S | Enhanced Enforcement |
Polyspace Bug Finder | R2016a | Sensitive data not cleared or released by memory routine Variable in stack is not cleared and contains sensitive data | |
PRQA QA-C | Unable to render {include} The included page could not be found. | warncall for realloc | Partially implemented |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
SEI CERT C++ Coding Standard | MEM03-CPP. Clear sensitive information stored in returned reusable resources |
ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013 | Sensitive Information Uncleared Before Use [XZK] |
MITRE CWE | CWE-226, Sensitive information uncleared before release CWE-244, Failure to clear heap memory before release ("heap inspection") |
Bibliography