You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 40 Next »

An exception can occur in the finally block despite compile-time checking. This can prevent other clean-up statements from being executed.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example uses a finally block that closes the reader object. However, it is incorrectly assumed that the statements occurring in the finally block cannot throw exceptions.

public class Operation {
  private static void doOperation(String some_file) throws IOException {
    BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(some_file));
    // Do operations 
     
    } finally {
      reader.close();
      // ... Other clean-up code ...
    }
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
    String path = "somepath";
    doOperation(path);
  }
}

Notably, the close() method can throw an IOException which prevents any subsequent clean-up statements from being executed. This is not detected at compile time because the type of exception that close() throws is the same as the type of exceptions that methods read() and write() throw.

Compliant Solution (1) (handle exceptions in finally block)

This compliant solution correctly places the close() statement in a try-catch block. As a result, an IOException can be handled without letting it propagate any further.

public class Operation {
  static void doOperation(String some_file) throws IOException {
    BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(some_file));

    try {
      // Do operations
    } finally {
      try {    
        // Enclose in try-catch block
        reader.close();
      } catch (IOException ie) {
        // Forward to handler
      }
      // Other clean-up code
    }
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
    String path = "somepath";
    doOperation(path);
  }
}

Compliant Solution (2) (dedicated method to handle exceptions)

If there is a frequent need to close a stream without throwing an exception, an alternative solution to wrapping every call to close() in its own try-catch block is to use a closeIgnoringException() method, as shown in this compliant solution.

public class Operation {
  static void doOperation(String some_file) throws IOException {
    BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(some_file));

    try {
      // Do operations
    } finally {
      closeIgnoringException(reader);
      // Other clean-up code 
    }
  } 

  private static void closeIgnoringException(BufferredReader s) {
    if (s != null) {
      try {
        s.close();
      } catch (IOException ie) {
        // Ignore exception if close fails
      }
    }
  }

  public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
    doOperation("somepath");
  }
}

Risk Assessment

Failing to handle an exception in a finally block can lead to unexpected results.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

EXC05- J

low

unlikely

medium

P2

L3

Automated Detection

TODO

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

References

[[Bloch 2005]] Puzzle 41: Field and Stream
[[Harold 1999]]
[[Chess 2007]] 8.3 Preventing Resource Leaks (Java)


EXC04-J. Do not exit abruptly from a finally block      17. Exceptional Behavior (EXC)      EXC06-J. Do not allow exceptions to transmit sensitive information

  • No labels