Application code that calls security-sensitive methods must validate the arguments being passed to the methods. In particular, null
values may be interpreted as benign by certain security-sensitive methods and may override default settings. Although security-sensitive methods must be coded defensively in the first place, sometimes the onus must be on the client code to validate the arguments it provides. Failure to do so can result in privilege escalation and execution of arbitrary code.
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example shows the two-argument doPrivileged()
method which takes an access control context as the second argument. The construct allows changing privileges to that of a previously saved context.
AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedAction<Void>() { public Void run() { // ... } }, accessControlContext);
A null access control context means that the privileges would not be reduced to those of the previously saved context. Consequently, this code may grant excess privileges if accessControlContext
is null. If AccessController.doPrivileged()
is intended to be called with a null access control context, it should be explicitly passed the null
constant.
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution prevents excess privileges from being granted by ensuring that accessControlContext
is not null.
if (accessControlContext == null) { throw new SecurityException("Missing AccessControlContext"); } AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedAction<Void>() { public Void run() { // ... } }, accessControlContext);
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example ...
System.setSecurityManager(null);
Compliant Solution
This compliant solution ...
System.setSecurityManager(new SecurityManager());
Applicability
Bibliography
[TODO] | https://www.cigital.com/justice-league-blog/2009/08/14/proper-use-of-javas-securerandom/ |
[API 2011] |
|