Superfluous code and values may occur in the form of dead code, code that has no effect and unused values in program logic.
Code that is never executed is known as dead code. Typically, the presence of dead code indicates that a logic error has occurred as a result of changes to a program or to the program's environment. Dead code is often optimized out of a program during compilation. However, to improve readability and ensure that logic errors are resolved, dead code should be identified, understood, and removed.
Code that is executed but does not perform any action, or has an unintended effect, most likely results from a coding error and can result in unexpected behavior. Statements or expressions that have no effect should be identified and removed from code. Most modern compilers can warn about code that has no effect.
The presence of unused values in code may indicate significant logic errors. To prevent such errors, unused values should be identified and removed from code.
Noncompliant Code Example (Dead Code)
This noncompliant code example demonstrates how dead code can be introduced into a program [Fortify 06].
public int func(boolean condition) { int x = 0; if (condition) { x = foo(); /* Process x */ return x; } /* ... */ if (x != 0) { /* This code is never executed */ } return x; }
The condition in the second if statement, (x != 0)
, will never evaluate to true
because the only path where x
can be assigned a non-zero value ends with a return statement.
Compliant Solution
Remediation of dead code requires the programmer to determine not only why the code is never executed but also whether the code should have been executed, and then to resolve that situation appropriately. This compliant solution assumes that the dead code should have executed and consequently, removes the return
from the body of the first conditional statement.
int func(int condition) { int x = 0; if (condition) { x = foo(); /* Process x */ } /* ... */ if (x != 0) { /* This code is now executed */ } return 0; }
Noncompliant Code Example (Dead Code)
In this example, the length()
function is used to limit the number of times the function string_loop()
will iterate. The condition of the if statement inside the loop evaluates to true when the current index is the length of str
. However, because i
is always strictly less than str.length()
, that will never happen.
public int string_loop(String str) { for (int i=0; i < str.length(); i++) { /* ... */ if (i==str.length()) { /* This code is never executed */ } } return 0; }
Compliant Solution
Remediating the dead code properly depends on the intent of the programmer. Assuming the intent is to do something special with the last character in str
, the conditional statement is adjusted to check whether i
refers to the index of the last character in str
.
public int string_loop(String str) { for (int i=0; i < str.length(); i++) { /* ... */ if (i==str.length()-1) { /* This code is now executed */ } } return 0; }
Noncompliant Code Example (Code with no Effect)
In this noncompliant code example, the comparison of s
to t
has no effect.
String s; String t; // ... s.equals(t);
This error is probably the result of the programmer intending to do something with the comparison but failing to complete the code.
Compliant Solution
In this compliant solution, the result of the comparison is printed out.
String s; String t; // ... if (s.equals(t)) { System.out.println("Strings equal"); } else { System.out.println("Strings unequal"); }
Noncompliant Code Example (Unused Values)
In this example, p2
is assigned the value returned by bar()
, but that value is never used.
int p1 = foo(); int p2 = bar(); if (baz()) { return p1; } else { p2 = p1; } return p2;
Compliant Solution
This example can be corrected in many different ways depending on the intent of the programmer. In this compliant solution, p2
is found to be extraneous. The calls to bar()
and baz()
could also be removed if they do not produce any side effects.
int p1 = foo(); bar(); /* Removable if bar() does not produce any side effects */ baz(); /* Removable if baz() does not produce any side effects */ return p1;
Applicability
The presence of dead code may indicate logic errors that can lead to unintended program behavior. The ways in which dead code can be introduced into a program and the effort required to remove it can be complex. As a result, resolving dead code can be an in-depth process requiring significant analysis.
In exceptional situations, dead code may make software resilient to future changes. An example of this is the presence of a default case in a switch statement even though all possible switch labels are specified (see MSC60-JG. Strive for logical completeness for an illustration of this example).
It is also permissible to temporarily leave code that may be needed later. Such cases should be clearly indicated with an appropriate comment.
The presence of code that has no effect can indicate logic errors that may result in unexpected behavior and vulnerabilities.
Unused values in code may indicate significant logic errors.
Code and values that have no effect can be detected by suitable static analysis.
Related Guidelines
ISO/IEC PDTR 24772 | "BRS Leveraging human experience," "BVQ Unspecified Functionality," and "XYQ Dead and Deactivated Code" |
MITRE 07 | CWE ID 561, "Dead Code" |
[MISRA 04] | Rule 2.4 |
ISO/IEC PDTR 24772 | "BRS Leveraging human experience," "BVQ Unspecified Functionality," "KOA Likely incorrect expressions," and "XYQ Dead and Deactivated Code" |
ISO/IEC PDTR 24772 | "BRS Leveraging Human Experience," "KOA Likely Incorrect Expressions," "XYQ Dead and Deactivated Code," and "XYR Unused Variable" |
Bibliography
[Fortify 06] Code Quality, "Dead Code"