Synchronizing on the return value of the Object.getClass()
method can lead to unexpected behavior. Whenever the implementing class is subclassed, the subclass locks on the subclass's type. The Class
object of the subclass is entirely distinct from the Class
object of the parent class.
According to the Java Language Specification, §4.3.2, "The Class Object," [[JLS 2005]]:
A class method that is declared
synchronized
synchronizes on the lock associated with theClass
object of the class.
Programmers who interpret this to mean that a subclass using getClass()
will synchronize on the Class
object of the base class are incorrect. The subclass will actually lock on its own Class
object; which may or may not be what the programmer intended. Consequently, programs must not synchronize on the class object returned by getClass()
.
The programmer's actual intent should be clearly documented or annotated. Note that when a subclass fails to override an accessible noncompliant superclass's method, it inherits the method, which may lead to the false conclusion that the superclass's intrinsic lock is available in the subclass.
When synchronizing on a class literal, the corresponding lock object should be inaccessible to untrusted code. Callers from other packages cannot access class objects that are package-private; consequently, synchronizing on the intrinsic lock object of such classes is permitted. For more information, see rule LCK00-J. Use private final lock objects to synchronize classes that may interact with untrusted code.
Noncompliant Code Example (getClass()
Lock Object)
In this noncompliant code example, the parse()
method of the Base
class parses a date and synchronizes on the class object returned by getClass()
. The Derived
class also inherits the parse()
method. However, this inherited method synchronizes on Derived
's class object because the inherited parse method's invocation of getClass()
is really an invocation of this.getClass()
, and the this
argument is a reference to the instance of the Derived
class.
The Derived
class also adds a doSomethingAndParse()
method that locks on the class object of the Base
class because the developer misconstrued that the parse()
method in Base
always obtains a lock on the Base
class object, and doSomethingAndParse()
must follow the same locking policy. Consequently, the Derived
class has two different locking strategies and fails to be thread-safe.
class Base { static DateFormat format = DateFormat.getDateInstance(DateFormat.MEDIUM); public Date parse(String str) throws ParseException { synchronized (getClass()) { return format.parse(str); } } } class Derived extends Base { public Date doSomethingAndParse(String str) throws ParseException { synchronized (Base.class) { // ... return format.parse(str); } } }
// Hidden main() method to be put in class Derived
// Prints arbitrary date values and throws exceptions at times
public static void main(String[] args) {
for(int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
new Thread(new Runnable() {
@Override public void run() {
try {
System.out.println(new Derived().parse("Jan 1, 2010"));
} catch (ParseException e) {
// Forward to handler
}
}
}).start();
new Thread(new Runnable() {
@Override public void run() {
try {
System.out.println(new Derived().doSomethingAndParse("Jan 2, 2010"));
} catch (ParseException e) {
// Forward to handler
}
}
}).start();
}
}
Compliant Solution (Class Name Qualification)
In this compliant solution, the class name providing the lock (Base
) is fully qualified.
class Base { static DateFormat format = DateFormat.getDateInstance(DateFormat.MEDIUM); public Date parse(String str) throws ParseException { synchronized (Base.class) { return format.parse(str); } } } // ...
This code example always synchronizes on the Base.class
object, even when it is called from a Derived
object.
Compliant Solution (Class.forName()
)
This compliant solution uses the Class.forName()
method to synchronize on the Base
class's Class
object.
class Base { static DateFormat format = DateFormat.getDateInstance(DateFormat.MEDIUM); public Date parse(String str) throws ParseException { try { synchronized (Class.forName("Base")) { return format.parse(str); } } catch (ClassNotFoundException x) { // "Base" not found; handle error } return null; } } // ...
Never accept untrusted inputs as arguments while loading classes using Class.forName()
. See rule SEC03-J. Do not load trusted classes after allowing untrusted code to load arbitrary classes for more information.
Noncompliant Code Example (getClass()
Lock Object, Inner Class)
This noncompliant code example synchronizes on the class object returned by getClass()
in the parse()
method of class Base
. The Base
class also has a nested Helper
class whose doSomethingAndParse()
method incorrectly synchronizes on the value returned by getClass()
.
class Base { static DateFormat format = DateFormat.getDateInstance(DateFormat.MEDIUM); public Date parse(String str) throws ParseException { synchronized (getClass()) { return format.parse(str); } } public Date doSomething(String str) throws ParseException { return new Helper().doSomethingAndParse(str); } private class Helper { public Date doSomethingAndParse(String str) throws ParseException { synchronized (getClass()) { // Synchronizes on getClass() // ... return format.parse(str); } } } }
The call to getClass()
in the Helper
class returns a Helper
class object instead of the Base
class object. Consequently, a thread that calls Base.parse()
locks on a different object than a thread that calls Base.doSomething()
. It is easy to overlook concurrency errors in inner classes because they exist within the body of the containing outer class. A reviewer might incorrectly assume that the two classes have the same locking strategy.
Compliant Solution (Class Name Qualification)
This compliant solution synchronizes using a Base
class literal in the parse()
and doSomethingAndParse()
methods.
class Base { // ... public Date parse(String str) throws ParseException { synchronized (Base.class) { return format.parse(str); } } private class Helper { public Date doSomethingAndParse(String str) throws ParseException { synchronized (Base.class) { // Synchronizes on Base class literal // ... return format.parse(str); } } } }
Consequently, both Base
and Helper
lock on Base
's intrinsic lock. Similarly, the Class.forName()
method can be used instead of a class literal.
Risk Assessment
Synchronizing on the class object returned by getClass()
can result in nondeterministic behavior.
Rule |
Severity |
Likelihood |
Remediation Cost |
Priority |
Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCK02-J |
medium |
probable |
medium |
P8 |
L2 |
// Ignore
The following table summarizes the examples flagged as violations by FindBugs:
Noncompliant Code Example |
Flagged |
Checker |
Message |
---|---|---|---|
|
No |
WL_USING_GETCLASS_RATHER_THAN_CLASS_LITERAL |
n/a |
The following table summarizes the examples flagged as violations by SureLogic Flashlight:
Noncompliant Code Example |
Flagged |
Message |
---|---|---|
|
No |
No data available about field accesses |
Bibliography
[[API 2006]] |
|
[[Findbugs 2008]] |
|
[[Pugh 2008]] |
Synchronization |
[[Miller 2009]] |
Locking |
null [!The CERT Oracle Secure Coding Standard for Java^button_arrow_up.png!] null