You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 179 Next »

Do not call a function with the wrong number or type of arguments. 

The C Standard identifies five distinct situations in which undefined behavior (UB) may arise as a result of invoking a function using a declaration that is incompatible with its definition or by supplying incorrect types or numbers of arguments:

UBDescription

26

A pointer is used to call a function whose type is not compatible with the referenced type (6.3.2.3).

38

For a call to a function without a function prototype in scope, the number of arguments does not equal the number of parameters (6.5.2.2).

39

For a call to a function without a function prototype in scope where the function is defined with a function prototype, either the prototype ends with an ellipsis or the types of the arguments after promotion are not compatible with the types of the parameters (6.5.2.2).

40

For a call to a function without a function prototype in scope where the function is not defined with a function prototype, the types of the arguments after promotion are not compatible with those of the parameters after promotion (with certain exceptions) (6.5.2.2).

41

A function is defined with a type that is not compatible with the type (of the expression) pointed to by the expression that denotes the called function (6.5.2.2).

Functions that are appropriately declared (as in DCL40-C. Do not create incompatible declarations of the same function or object) will typically generate a compiler diagnostic message if they are supplied with the wrong number or types of arguments. However, there are cases in which supplying the incorrect arguments to a function will, at best, generate compiler warnings. Although such warnings should be resolved, they do not prevent program compilation. (See MSC00-C. Compile cleanly at high warning levels.)

Noncompliant Code Example

The header <tgmath.h> provides type-generic macros for math functions. Although most functions from the <math.h> header have a complex counterpart in <complex.h>, several functions do not. Calling any of the following type-generic functions with complex values is undefined behavior.

Functions That Should Not Be Called with Complex Values

atan2()erf()fdim()fmin()ilogb()llround()logb()nextafter()rint()tgamma()
cbrt()erfc()floor()fmod()ldexp()log10()lrint()nexttoward()round()trunc()
ceil()exp2()fma()frexp()lgamma()log1p()lround()remainder()scalbn()
copysign()expm1()fmax()hypot()llrint()log2()nearbyint()remquo()scalbln()


This noncompliant code example attempts to take the base-2 logarithm of a complex number, resulting in undefined behavior:

#include <tgmath.h>
 
void func(void) {
  double complex c = 2.0 + 4.0 * I;
  double complex result = log2(c);
}

Compliant Solution (Complex Number)

If the clog2() function is not available for an implementation as an extension, the programmer can take the base-2 logarithm of a complex number, using log() instead of log2(), because log() can be used on complex arguments, as shown in this compliant solution:

#include <tgmath.h>
 
void func(void) {
  double complex c = 2.0 + 4.0 * I;
  double complex result = log(c)/log(2);
}

Compliant Solution (Real Number)

The programmer can use this compliant solution if the intent is to take the base-2 logarithm of the real part of the complex number:

#include <tgmath.h>
 
void func(void) {
  double complex c = 2.0 + 4.0 * I;
  double complex result = log2(creal(c));
}

Noncompliant Code Example

In this noncompliant example, the C standard library function strchr() is called through the function pointer fp declared with a prototype with incorrectly typed arguments. According to the C Standard, 6.3.2.3, paragraph 8 [ISO/IEC 9899:2011]

A pointer to a function of one type may be converted to a pointer to a function of another type and back again; the result shall compare equal to the original pointer. If a converted pointer is used to call a function whose type is not compatible with the referenced type, the behavior is undefined.

See undefined behavior 26.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>

char *(*fp)();

int main(void) {
  const char *c;
  fp = strchr;
  c = fp('e', "Hello");
  printf("%s\n", c);
  return 0;
}

Compliant Solution

In this compliant solution, the function pointer fp, which points to the C standard library function strchr(), is declared with the correct parameters and is invoked with the correct number and type of arguments:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>

char *(*fp)(const char *, int);

int main(void) {
  const char *c;
  fp = strchr;
  c = fp("Hello",'e');
  printf("%s\n", c);
  return 0;
}

Noncompliant Code Example

In this noncompliant example, the function f() is defined to take an argument of type long but f() is called from another file with an argument of type int:

/* In another source file */
long f(long x) {
  return x < 0 ? -x : x;
}

/* In this source file, no f prototype in scope */
long f();
 
long g(int x) {
  return f(x);
}

Compliant Solution

In this compliant solution, the prototype for the function f() is included in the source file in the scope of where it is called, and the function f() is correctly called with an argument of type long:

/* In another source file */
 
long f(long x) {
  return x < 0 ? -x : x;
}

/* f prototype in scope in this source file */

long f(long x); 

long g(int x) {
  return f((long)x);  
}

Noncompliant Code Example (POSIX)

The POSIX function open() [IEEE Std 1003.1:2013] is a variadic function with the following prototype:

int open(const char *path, int oflag, ... );

The open() function accepts a third argument to determine a newly created file's access mode. If open() is used to create a new file and the third argument is omitted, the file may be created with unintended access permissions. (See FIO06-C. Create files with appropriate access permissions.)

In this noncompliant code example from a vulnerability in the useradd() function of the shadow-utils package CVE-2006-1174, the third argument to open() is accidentally omitted:

fd = open(ms, O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC);

Technically, it is incorrect to pass a third argument to open() when not creating a new file (that is, with the O_CREAT flag not set).

Compliant Solution (POSIX)

In this compliant solution, a third argument is specified in the call to open():

#include <fcntl.h>
 
void func(const char *ms, mode_t perms) {
  /* ... */
  int fd;
  fd = open(ms, O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC, perms);
  if (fd == -1) {
    /* Handle error */
  }
}

Risk Assessment

Calling a function with incorrect arguments can result in unexpected or unintended program behavior.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

EXP37-C

Medium

Probable

High

P4

L3

Automated Detection

ToolVersionCheckerDescription
Astrée
24.04

Supported, but no explicit checker
Axivion Bauhaus Suite

7.2.0

CertC-EXP37
CodeSonar
8.1p0

LANG.FUNCS.APM

Array parameter mismatch
Compass/ROSE

Can detect some violations of this rule. In particular, it ensures that all calls to open() supply exactly two arguments if the second argument does not involve O_CREAT, and exactly three arguments if the second argument does involve O_CREAT

Coverity
2017.07

MISRA C 2012 Rule 8.2

MISRA C 2012 Rule 17.3

Implemented

Relies on functions declared with prototypes, allow compiler to check

ECLAIR

1.2

CC2.EXP37

Partially implemented

EDG


GCC
4.3.5

Can detect violation of this rule when the -Wstrict-prototypes flag is used. However, it cannot detect violations involving variadic functions, such as the open() example described earlier

Klocwork
2024.3
MISRA.FUNC.UNMATCHED.PARAMS
LDRA tool suite
9.7.1

41 D, 21 S, 98 S, 170 S, 496 S, 576 S

Partially implemented
Parasoft C/C++test

2023.1

CERT_C-EXP37-a
CERT_C-EXP37-b
CERT_C-EXP37-c
CERT_C-EXP37-d

Identifiers shall be given for all of the parameters in a function prototype declaration
Function types shall have named parameters
Function types shall be in prototype form
Functions shall always have visible prototype at the function call

Polyspace Bug Finder

R2024a

Bad file access mode or status

Declaration mismatch

Format string specifiers and arguments mismatch

Qualifier removed in conversion

Standard function call with incorrect arguments

Unreliable cast of function pointer

MISRA C:2012 Rule 8.3

MISRA C:2012 Rule 11.1

MISRA C:2012 Rule 17.3

Access mode argument of function in fopen or open group is invalid

Mismatch between function or variable declarations

String specifiers do not match corresponding arguments

Variable qualifier is lost during conversion

Argument to a standard function does not meet requirements for use in the function

Function pointer cast to another function pointer with different argument or return type

All declarations of an object or function shall use the same names and type qualifiers

Conversions shall not be performed between a pointer to a function and any other type

A function shall not be declared implicitly

PRQA QA-C++4.1 0403
PRQA QA-C
Unable to render {include} The included page could not be found.
1331, 1332, 1333, 3002, 3320, 3335Partially implemented
PVS-Studio

7.33

V540, V541, V549, V575, V632, V639, V666, V671, V742, V743, V764, V1004
SonarQube C/C++ Plugin
3.11
S930Detects incorrect argument count

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Related Guidelines

Key here (explains table format and definitions)

Taxonomy

Taxonomy item

Relationship

CERT C Secure Coding StandardDCL07-C. Include the appropriate type information in function declaratorsPrior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship
CERT C Secure Coding StandardMSC00-C. Compile cleanly at high warning levelsPrior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship
CERT C Secure Coding StandardFIO06-C. Create files with appropriate access permissionsPrior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship
ISO/IEC TR 24772:2013Subprogram Signature Mismatch [OTR]Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship
ISO/IEC TS 17961Calling functions with incorrect arguments [argcomp]Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship
MISRA C:2012Rule 8.2 (required)Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship
MISRA C:2012Rule 17.3 (mandatory)Prior to 2018-01-12: CERT: Unspecified Relationship
CWE 2.11CWE-628, Function Call with Incorrectly Specified Arguments2017-07-05: CERT: Rule subset of CWE

CERT-CWE Mapping Notes

Key here for mapping notes

CWE-685 and EXP37-C

EXP37-C = Union( CWE-685, CWE-686) Intersection( CWE-685, CWE-686) = Ø

CWE-686 and EXP37-C

Intersection( EXP37-C, FIO47-C) =


  • Invalid argument types passed to format I/O function


EXP37-C – FIO47-C =


  • Invalid argument types passed to non-format I/O function


FIO47-C – EXP37-C =


  • Invalid format string, but correctly matches arguments in number and type


EXP37-C = Union( CWE-685, CWE-686)

Intersection( CWE-685, CWE-686) = Ø

CWE-628 and EXP37-C

CWE-628 = Union( EXP37-C, list) where list =


  • Improper ordering of function arguments (that does not violate argument types)



  • Wrong argument values or references


Bibliography

[CVE]CVE-2006-1174
[ISO/IEC 9899:2011]6.3.2.3, "Pointers"
6.5.2.2, "Function Calls"
[IEEE Std 1003.1:2013]open()
[Spinellis 2006]Section 2.6.1, "Incorrect Routine or Arguments"




  • No labels