You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 83 Next »

The signal() function has implementation-defined behavior and behaves differently on Windows, for example, than it does on many UNIX systems.

The following code example shows this behavior:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <signal.h>

volatile sig_atomic_t e_flag = 0;

void handler(int signum) {
  e_flag = 1;
}

int main(void) {
  if (signal(SIGINT, handler) == SIG_ERR) {
    /* Handle error */
  }
  while (!e_flag) {}
  puts("Escaped from first while ()");
  e_flag = 0;
  while (!e_flag) {}
  puts("Escaped from second while ()");
  return 0;
}

Many UNIX (and UNIX-like) systems automatically reinstall signal handlers upon handler execution, meaning that the signal handler defined by the user is left in place until it is explicitly removed. For example, when this code is compiled with GCC 3.4.4 and executed under Red Hat Linux, SIGINT is captured both times by handler:

% ./test
^C
Escaped from first while ()
^C
Escaped from second while ()
%

When a signal handler is installed with the signal() function in Windows and some UNIX systems, the default action is restored for that signal after the signal is triggered. This means that signal handlers are not automatically reinstalled. For example, when this code is compiled with Microsoft Visual Studio 2005, version 8.0, only the first SIGINT is captured by handler:

> test.exe
^C
Escaped from first while ()
^C
>

The second SIGINT executes the default action, which is to terminate program execution.

Different actions must be taken depending on whether or not the application requires signal handlers to be persistent.

Persistent Handlers

Asynchronous signals may originate from malicious actors external to the process. Consequently, vulnerabilities may exist if the signal-handler-persistence behavior is inconsistent with the developer's expectations, such as when the developer expects the signal handler to persist but it does not.

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example fails to persist the signal handler on Windows platforms and on those UNIX systems where handlers are not persistent by default:

void handler(int signum) {
  /* Handle signal */
}

Noncompliant Code Example

A common approach to create persistent signal handlers is to call signal() from within the handler itself, consequently unresetting the reset signal:

void handler(int signum) {
  if (signal(signum, handler) == SIG_ERR) {
    /* Handle error */
  }
  /* Handle signal */
}

Unfortunately, this solution still contains a race window, starting when the host environment resets the signal and ending when the handler calls signal(). During that time, a second signal sent to the program will trigger the default signal behavior, defeating the persistent behavior. (See SIG34-C. Do not call signal() from within interruptible signal handlers.)

A secure solution must prevent the environment from resetting the signal in the first place, guaranteeing persistence. Unfortunately, Windows does not provide a secure solution to this problem.

Compliant Solution (POSIX)

The POSIX sigaction() function assigns handlers to signals in a manner similar to the C signal() function but also allows signal-handler persistence to be controlled via the SA_RESETHAND flag. (Leaving the flag clear makes the handler persistent.)

/* 
 * Equivalent to signal(SIGUSR1, handler) but makes
 * signal persistent. 
 */
struct sigaction act;
act.sa_handler = handler;
act.sa_flags = 0;
if (sigemptyset(&act.sa_mask) != 0) {
  /* Handle error */
}
if (sigaction(SIGUSR1, &act, NULL) != 0) {
  /* Handle error */
}

POSIX recommends sigaction() and deprecates signal(). Unfortunately, sigaction() is not defined in the C Standard and is consequently not as portable a solution.

Nonpersistent Handlers

Errors may also occur when the developer expects the default action to be restored for a signal but the signal handler persists instead.

Noncompliant Code Example (UNIX)

This noncompliant code example fails to reset the signal handler to its default behavior on systems where handlers are persistent by default:

void handler(int signum) {
  /* Handle signal */
}

Compliant Solution (UNIX and Windows)

A C-compliant solution to reset the handler on a UNIX system is to rebind the signal to the default handler in the first line of the handler itself. Windows, however, automatically resets handlers to their default behavior.

void handler(int signum) {
#ifndef WINDOWS
  if (signal(signum, SIG_DFL) == SIG_ERR) {
    /* Handler error */
  }
#endif
  /* Handle signal */
}

With the compliant solution for UNIX, no race condition occurs that can be exploited by an attacker sending a second signal. This is because a second signal sent to the handler, before the latter calls signal(signum, SIG_DFL), will only cause the handler to restart and call signal() anyway.

This solution is an exception to SIG34-C. Do not call signal() from within interruptible signal handlers.

Compliant Solution (POSIX)

The POSIX sigaction() function assigns handlers to signals in a manner similar to the C signal() function but also allows signal-handler persistence to be controlled via the SA_RESETHAND flag. (Setting the flag makes the handler nonpersistent.)

/* 
 * Equivalent to signal(SIGUSR1, handler) but makes
 * signal nonpersistent.
 */
struct sigaction act;
act.sa_handler = handler;
act.sa_flags = SA_RESETHAND;
if (sigemptyset(&act.sa_mask) != 0) {
  /* Handle error */
}
if (sigaction(SIGUSR1, &act, NULL) != 0) {
  /* Handle error */
}

Risk Assessment

Failure to understand implementation-specific details regarding signal-handler persistence can lead to unexpected behavior.

Recommendation

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

SIG01-C

Low

Unlikely

Low

P3

L3

Automated Detection

Tool

Version

Checker

Description

CodeSonar8.1p0BADFUNC.SIGNALUse of signal
Compass/ROSE

 

 

Could detect possible violations by flagging any signal handler that calls signal() to (re)assert itself as the handler for its signal

LDRA tool suite9.7.197 DPartially implemented
Parasoft C/C++test9.5MISRA2012-RULE-21_5_bUse of signal
PRQA QA-C
Unable to render {include} The included page could not be found.
warncall for signalPartially implemented

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Related Guidelines

 


  • No labels