If an attacker can overwrite memory containing function pointers, they may be able to execute arbitrary code. To mitigate the effects of such attacks, pointers to functions can be encrypted at runtime on the basis of some characteristics of the execution process so that only a running process will be able to decode them. This is only required for stored function pointers stored to writable memory, including the stack.
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code example assigns the address of the printf()
function to the log_fn
function pointer, which can be allocated in the stack or data segment:
int (*log_fn)(const char *, ...) = printf; /* ... */ log_fn("foo");
If a vulnerability exists in this program that allows an attacker to overwrite the log_fn
function pointer, such as a buffer overflow or arbitrary memory write, the attacker may be able to overwrite the value of printf
with the location of an arbitrary function.
Compliant Solution (Windows)
Microsoft Windows provides the EncodePointer()
and DecodePointer()
functions that encrypt and decrypt pointers using a secret that is unique to the given process:
#include <Windows.h> void *log_fn = EncodePointer(printf); /* ... */ int (*fn)(const char *, ...) = (int (*)(const char *, ...))DecodePointer(log_fn); fn("foo");
Note that DecodePointer()
does not return success or failure. If an attacker has overwritten the pointer contained in log_fn
, the pointer returned will be invalid and cause your application to crash. However, this is preferable to giving an attacker the ability to execute arbitrary code.
Risk Assessment
Recommendation | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WIN04-C | high | unlikely | low | P9 | L2 |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
SEI CERT C++ Coding Standard | MSC16-CPP. Consider encrypting function pointers |
MITRE CWE | CWE-311, Missing encryption of sensitive data |
Bibliography