C library functions that make changes to arrays or objects take at least two arguments: a pointer to the array or object and an integer indicating the number of elements or bytes to be manipulated. If improper arguments are supplied to such a function, it might cause the function to form a pointer that does not point into or just past the end of the object, resulting in undefined behavior.

For the purposes of this rule, the element count of a pointer is the size of the object to which it points, expressed by the number of elements that are valid to access.

In the following code,

int arr[5];
int *p = arr;

unsigned char *p2 = (unsigned char *)arr;
unsigned char *p3 = arr + 2;
void *p4 = arr;

the element count of the pointer p is sizeof(arr) / sizeof(arr[0]), that is, 5. The element count of the pointer p2 is sizeof(arr), that is, 20, on platforms where sizeof(int) == 4. The element count of the pointer p3 is 12 on platforms where sizeof(int) == 4, because p3 points two elements past the start of the array arr.  The element count of p4 is treated as though it were unsigned char * instead of void *, so it is the same as p2.

Library Functions That Take a Pointer and Integer

The following standard library functions take a pointer argument and a size argument, with the constraint that the pointer must point to a valid memory object of at least the number of elements indicated by the size argument.

¹ Takes two pointers and an integer, but the integer specifies the element count only of the output buffer, not of the input buffer.
² Takes two pointers and an integer, but the integer specifies the element count only of the input buffer, not of the output buffer.
³ Takes two pointers and two integers; each integer corresponds to the element count of one of the pointers.
⁴ Takes a pointer and two size-related integers; the first size-related integer parameter specifies the number of bytes available in the buffer; the second size-related integer parameter specifies the number of bytes to write within the buffer.

For calls that take a pointer and an integer size, the given size should not be greater than the element count of the pointer.

 Noncompliant Code Example (Element Count)

In this noncompliant code example, the incorrect element count is used in a call to wmemcpy(). The sizeof operator returns the size expressed in bytes, but wmemcpy() uses an element count based on wchar_t *.

#include <string.h>
#include <wchar.h>
 
static const char str[] = "Hello world";
static const wchar_t w_str[] = L"Hello world";
void func(void) {
  char buffer[32];
  wchar_t w_buffer[32];
  memcpy(buffer, str, sizeof(str));
  wmemcpy(w_buffer, w_str, sizeof(w_str));
}

Compliant Solution (Element Count)

When using functions that operate on pointed-to regions, programmers must always express the integer size in terms of the element count expected by the function. For instance, memcpy() expects the element count expressed in terms of void *, but wmemcpy() expects the element count expressed in terms of wchar_t *.  Instead of using the sizeof operator, calls to return the number of elements in the string are used, which matches the expected element count for the copy functions.

#include <string.h>
#include <wchar.h>
 
static const char str[] = "Hello world";
static const wchar_t w_str[] = L"Hello world";
void func(void) {
  char buffer[32];
  wchar_t w_buffer[32];
  memcpy(buffer, str, strlen(str) + 1);
  wmemcpy(w_buffer, w_str, wcslen(w_str) + 1);
} 

Noncompliant Code Example (Pointer + Integer)

This noncompliant code example assigns a value greater than the number of bytes of available memory to n, which is then passed to memset():

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
 
void f1(size_t nchars) {
  char *p = (char *)malloc(nchars);
  /* ... */
  const size_t n = nchars + 1;
  /* ... */
  memset(p, 0, n);
}

Compliant Solution (Pointer + Integer)

This compliant solution ensures that the value of n is not greater than the number of bytes of the dynamic memory pointed to by the pointer p:

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
 
void f1(size_t nchars) {
  char *p = (char *)malloc(nchars);
  /* ...  */
  const size_t n = nchars;
  /* ...  */
  memset(p, 0, n);
}

Noncompliant Code Example (Pointer + Integer)

In this noncompliant code example, the element count of the array a is ARR_SIZE elements. Because memset() expects a byte count, the size of the array is scaled incorrectly by sizeof(int) instead of sizeof(float), which can form an invalid pointer on architectures where sizeof(int) != sizeof(float).

#include <string.h>
 
void f2() {
  const size_t ARR_SIZE = 4;
  float a[ARR_SIZE];
  const size_t n = sizeof(int) * ARR_SIZE;
  void *p = a;

  memset(p, 0, n);
}

Compliant Solution (Pointer + Integer)

In this compliant solution, the element count required by memset() is properly calculated without resorting to scaling:

#include <string.h>
 
void f2() {
  const size_t ARR_SIZE = 4;
  float a[ARR_SIZE];
  const size_t n = sizeof(a);
  void *p = a;

  memset(p, 0, n);
}

Library Functions That Take Two Pointers and an Integer

The following standard library functions take two pointer arguments and a size argument, with the constraint that both pointers must point to valid memory objects of at least the number of elements indicated by the size argument. 

For calls that take two pointers and an integer size, the given size should not be greater than the element count of either pointer.

Noncompliant Code Example (Two Pointers + One Integer)

In this noncompliant example, a diagnostic is required because the value of n is not computed correctly, allowing a possible write past the end of the object referenced by p:

#include <string.h>
 
void f4(char p[], const char *q) {
  const size_t n = sizeof(p); 
  if ((memcpy(p, q, n)) == p) {
    /* ... */
  }
}

This example also violates ARR01-C. Do not apply the sizeof operator to a pointer when taking the size of an array.

Compliant Solution (Two Pointers + One Integer)

This compliant solution ensures that n is equal to the size of the character array:

#include <string.h>
 
void f4(char p[], const char *q, size_t size_p) {
  const size_t n = size_p; 
  if ((memcpy(p, q, n)) == p) {
    /* ... */
  }
}

Library Functions That Take a Pointer and Two Integers

The following standard library functions take a pointer argument and two size arguments, with the constraint that the pointer must point to a valid memory object containing at least as many bytes as the product of the two size arguments.

For calls that take a pointer and two integers, one integer represents the number of bytes required for an individual object, and a second integer represents the number of elements in the array. The resulting product of the two integers should not be greater than the element count of the pointer were it expressed as an unsigned char *.  

Noncompliant Code Example (One Pointer + Two Integers)

This noncompliant code example allocates a variable number of objects of type struct obj. The function checks that num_objs is small enough to prevent wrapping, in compliance with INT30-C. Ensure that unsigned integer operations do not wrap. The size of struct obj is assumed to be 8 bytes to account for padding. However, the padding is dependent on the target architecture as well as compiler settings, so this object size may be incorrect resulting in an incorrect element count.

#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
 
struct obj {
  char c;
  int i;
};
 
void func(FILE *f, struct obj *objs, size_t num_objs) {
  const size_t obj_size = 8;
  if (num_objs > (SIZE_MAX / obj_size) ||
      num_objs != fwrite(objs, obj_size, num_objs, f)) {
    /* Handle error */
  }
}

Compliant Solution (One Pointer + Two Integers)

This compliant solution uses the sizeof operator to correctly provide the object size and num_objs to provide the element count.

#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
 
struct obj {
  char c;
  int i;
};
 
void func(FILE *f, struct obj *objs, size_t num_objs) {
  if (num_objs > (SIZE_MAX / sizeof(*objs)) ||
      num_objs != fwrite(objs, sizeof(*objs), num_objs, f)) {
    /* Handle error */
  }
}

Risk Assessment

Depending on the library function called, an attacker may be able to use a heap or stack overflow vulnerability to run arbitrary code.

Automated Detection

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Related Guidelines

Bibliography