Do not use the assignment operator in the following cases because it typically indicates programmer error and can result in unexpected behavior:
- Controlling expression of
if, switch
(selection statement) - Controlling expression of
while
,do...while
(iteration statement) - S
econd operand of for
(iteration statement) - First operand of
?:
(selection statement) - Either operand of
|| or &&
(logical operators) - Second operand of comma operator when the comma expression is used in any of these contexts
- Second and third operands of ?: (selection statement) where the ternary expression is used in any of these contexts
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant code example, an assignment expression is the outermost expression in an if
statement.
if (a = b) { /* ... */ }
Although the intent of the code may be to assign b
to a
and test the value of the result for equality to zero, it is very frequently a case of the programmer mistakenly using the assignment operator =
instead of the equals operator ==
. Consequently, many compilers will warn about this condition, making this coding error detectable by adhering to MSC00-C. Compile cleanly at high warning levels.
Compliant Solution
When the assignment of b
to a
is not intended, this conditional block is now executed when a
is equal to b
.
if (a == b) { /* ... */ }
When the assignment is intended, the following is an alternative compliant solution:
if ((a = b) != 0) { /* ... */ }
It is less desirable in general, depending on what was intended, because it mixes the assignment in the condition, but it is clear that the programmer intended the assignment to occur.
Noncompliant Code Example
In this noncompliant example, the expression x = y is used as the controlling expression of the while statement.
do { /* ... */ } while ( foo(), x = y ) ;
Compliant Solution
When the assignment of y to x is not intended, this conditional block is now executed when x is equal to y.
do { /* ... */ } while ( foo(), x == y ) ;
When the assignment is intended, the following is an alternative compliant solution:
do { /* ... */ } while ( foo(), (x = y) != 0) ;
It is less desirable in general, depending on what was intended, because it mixes the assignment in the condition, but it is clear that the programmer intended the assignment to occur.
Compliant Example
In this compliant example,the expression x = y is not used as the controlling expression of the while statement.
do { /* ... */ } while ( x = y, p == q ) ;
Exceptions
Assignment can be used where the result of the assignment is itself a parameter to a comparison expression or relational expression
if ( ( x = y ) != 0 ) { /* ... */ }
- Assignment can be used where the expression consists of a single primary expression
Risk Assessment
Errors of omission can result in unintended program flow.
Recommendation | Severity | Likelihood | Remediation Cost | Priority | Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXP18-C | low | likely | medium | P6 | L2 |
Automated Detection
Tool | Version | Checker | Description |
---|---|---|---|
9.7.1 |
|
| |
GCC | 4.3.5 |
| Can detect violations of this recommendation when the |
Compass/ROSE |
|
| Could detect violations of this recommendation by identifying any assignment expression as the top-level expression in an |
2024.3 | ASSIGCOND.GEN |
| |
1.2 | exprctxt | Fully implemented. |
Related Vulnerabilities
Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.
Related Guidelines
CERT C++ Secure Coding Standard | EXP19-CPP. Do not perform assignments in conditional expressions |
---|---|
CERT Oracle Secure Coding Standard for Java | EXP51-JG. Do not perform assignments in conditional expressions |
ISO/IEC TR 24772 | Likely incorrect expression [KOA] |
MITRE CWE | CWE-480, Use of incorrect operator |
ISO/IEC TR 17961 (Draft) | No assignment in conditional expressions [boolasgn] |
Bibliography
[Hatton 1995] | Section 2.7.2, "Errors of Omission and Addition" |
---|